SCEE? Responding to things? Surely you justnofi said:I'm sure it is, but would have been nice to have been told by SCEE. =)

SCEE? Responding to things? Surely you justnofi said:I'm sure it is, but would have been nice to have been told by SCEE. =)
I think it was a last minute thing, a couple of reviews were taken down, guess they didn't know either.nofi said:I'm sure it is, but would have been nice to have been told by SCEE. =)
Averon said:Low to mid 80s for R3 sounds about right. The game is giving off a "good but tarnished" vibe to me.
codhand said:Could someone refresh my 1up-yours-podcast-memory, as to what about the single player campaign Garnett took issue with?
Shurs said:Resistance had the benefit of being a launch game, so it had few peers.
Resistance 2 was treated by reviewers like a AAA title, and thus most of its reviews reflect that, hence the inflated (9.5 from IGN) scores.
Resistance 3 does not have either of the above mentioned factors working in its favor.
I'm guessing mid-70s.
Usually embargoes don't go up for 7 to 11 more hours if they're held until release day.Ashes1396 said:It's the sixth of sept'11. Where are the reviews?
Ashes1396 said:It's the sixth of sept'11. Where are the reviews?
Nope. It easily deserved its 87.Kerrby said:No idea how Resistance 2 got 87 on metacritic, it deserved a 60 at best. Just shows how out of touch reviewers are.
Gods be praised.Poker360 said:9/10 on IGN
Same reviewer? No? Then your point is moot. Moot like sheeeeeit.Pranay_ said:R2 had 9.5 lol'
But then again IGN had overrated that game
duffyside said:Same reviewer? No? Then your point is moot. Moot like sheeeeeit.
Poker360 said:9/10 on IGN
You wanted spoilers?Cudder said:Did IGN make a stance to simplify the shit out of their reviews? Because that R3 "review" is so fucking short and pointless, I didn't learn one thing about the game I had not known before.
Moot sheeeeeeeeeit is better than R2. The question is, is R3 great and/or awesome? Bringing up sites' review history with R2 does them no favors, it seems. Gonna have to find a wifi spot and check the consensus on the way home from work tomorrow to make my decision.Pranay_ said:I know dude.
R3 is clearly a better game then R2 =)
Cudder said:Did IGN make a stance to simplify the shit out of their reviews? Because that R3 "review" is so fucking short and pointless, I didn't learn one thing about the game I had not known before.
Cudder said:Did IGN make a stance to simplify the shit out of their reviews? Because that R3 "review" is so fucking short and pointless, I didn't learn one thing about the game I had not known before.
How about some technical shit? How are the graphics? Sound? How does it play with the Move? How's the network reliability when playing online?darkwing said:You wanted spoilers?
jstevenson said:To be fair, they hinted ... but respected our wishes in not spoiling it.
Every kill in Resistance 3 is exceedingly satisfying - not only because of the first class arsenal and tight controls, but also because each time you take a Chimera down, it lets out an explosive death growl that tells you it's expired.
It's a spine-chilling experience, and if you play this game alone at night, you'll likely go from explosive growls to explosive bowels.
The high-octane, visceral action in Resistance 3 will blow you away.
Weapon upgrades also keep you coming back for more, and the more you level up, the more weapons you start to unlock.
The studio's team of writers have crafted a storyline that continually gut-punches you with its emotional resonance and unexpected moments, particularly in its second act
thanks for the warning, I just read the summary of scoresNBtoaster said:I don't think IGNs hinting is exactly subtle :\
Ashes1396 said:.....Might want to edit that out for others... smh.
Pullitzer (or maybe Oscar) quality writing thereItWasMeantToBe19 said:Which of these sentences isn't in the Resistance 3 IGN review:
jstevenson said:To be fair,, but respected our wishes in not spoiling it.they hinted at the big plot twist
Cudder said:How about some technical shit? How are the graphics? Sound? How does it play with the Move? How's the network reliability when playing online?
Wow, okay, I see that the link in the OP of this thread linked to the 2nd page of the review. My bad?
lowrider007 said:Agreed, think I need to back off from these threads now.
<shakes fist @ JS>
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/317226/reviews/resistance-3-review/Uppers
Graphically strong with some spectacular scenes
Variety increased in every aspect
Solid shooting returns with some punchy add-ons
Downers
AI is still a bit dodgy at times
Evolution not revolution
http://www.eurogamer.se/articles/2011-09-06-resistance-3-recensionDespite trying to act as a gritty tale of survival, Resistance 3 is in essence just a regular shooter, with far more action filled firefights than lurking tales of humanity. Thankfully it's a well made game and has an impressive arsenal of excellent weapons, and the multiplayer - including a much-missed co-op mode - is a lot of fun.
cutmeamango said:Well thank you mister, now I know the Chimeras are humans wearing costumes.
PerZona said:I was holding off whether or not to get Resistance 3 (cause of Resistance 2, really disappointed with it) before this review. And a few of my friends had already gotten their hands on this game and they are enjoying the story and gameplay.
And so right after reading and watching the IGN review i guess I'm gonna buy it! It's the last in the series already right?(