radioheadrule83
Banned
I Push Fat Kids said:Made this analogy before for the Zelda fight:
OoT = Ok Computer
MM = Kid A
LoZ = Drill EP
AoL = Pablo Honey
LttP = The Bends
LA = OK Computer
OoT / MM = Kid A / Amnesiac
WW = In Rainbows
I Push Fat Kids said:Made this analogy before for the Zelda fight:
OoT = Ok Computer
MM = Kid A
radioheadrule83 said:LoZ = Drill EP
AoL = Pablo Honey
LttP = The Bends
LA = OK Computer
OoT / MM = Kid A / Amnesiac
WW = In Rainbows
lololololMYE said:
shadyspace said:People still listen to Radiohead?
Lonewolf_92 said:Maybe Nintendo should buy Grasshopper (The Silver Case, Michigan: Report from Hell, Killer 7, NMH series) and Platinum Games (MadWorld, Bayonetta, Vanquish, Anarchy Reigns) and let them put out whatever they can exclusively for their systems. Perhaps then Nintendo won't be seen as "kiddy" by some.
ThoseDeafMutes said:The Bends and OK Computer are their only good albums. You'll have to pick a band that has consistently produced quality in order to make a fair comparison.
ThoseDeafMutes said:Apparently, some people liked their post-1998 output.
BowieZ said:This is not the conversation I wish to see when I hit refresh...
3 AM EST on the 26th is what financial sites are reportingradioheadrule83 said:Blame I Push Fat Kids
I find the idea of an iPad slapped into the middle of an unwieldy Dreamcast controller a bit frightening to be honest. I much prefer the idea of the screen being a separate entity...
when is their investor relations / earnings conference again?
havent really been any thread update.shadyspace said:I assume the Rockstar rumor has been thoroughly discussed? Surprised it's not in the OP, actually.
radioheadrule83 said:Blame I Push Fat Kids
I find the idea of an iPad slapped into the middle of an unwieldy Dreamcast controller a bit frightening to be honest. I much prefer the idea of the screen being a separate entity...
when is their investor relations / earnings conference again?
antonz said:3 AM EST on the 26th is what financial sites are reporting
They're too niche/small-time to make a substantial impact on public opinion of Nintendo. Just like no one gives a shit that they published Sin&Punishment 2, Fatal Frame 4 and The Last Story, no one would give a shit if they'd publish MadWorld Zero or The Silver Case Redux.Lonewolf_92 said:Maybe Nintendo should buy Grasshopper (The Silver Case, Michigan: Report from Hell, Killer 7, NMH series) and Platinum Games (MadWorld, Bayonetta, Vanquish, Anarchy Reigns) and let them put out whatever they can exclusively for their systems. Perhaps then Nintendo won't be seen as "kiddy" by some.
Maximilian E. said:Ok, so I wanted to share some thoughts about all this..
At first, Nintendo seems to be in a kind of "awkward" postion. Mobile gaming is starting, to some extentent, affecting or intruding into their dominance in the portable space and this for obvious reasons. A phone is something you always bring with you, a portable gaming device is something you have to make a conscious choice of bringing or not.
Secondly, the console market.
As I see it, it really does not matter if Nintendo releases the most impressive hardware ever, tech specs wise (obviously, they will not sell a machine at loss now, they basically never have). The problem with Nintendo, which has always been the case, is image. (yeah I know, people have been hearing this before).. but there are reasons why some of the most popular games of this generation, the CoDs, the assassins creed etc, have not been released on a ninty console (in some variation) or if it has, it has been a lackluster success.
The problem is that, as I see it again, it really does not matter if Nintendo invites all of the 3rd parties, if Nintendo themselves do not bring out these kind of "mature" games (like a CoD or assassins creed made by NIntendo 1st party), then nothing will ever change and Sony and MS will still house these kinds of IPs, IPs that do affect image, hardware and software sales etc.
(Side note, Wii won many points with its motion controller but what is the next step? Bio metric-input data? Motion sensing like Kinect seems to be where the money will be at, more advanced tech, coupled with above metioned biometric-data (pulse, cold, heat from body etc).
Anyways, my point is that for Nintendo, they have to change from within, in order to see changes from outside. Yes, Ninty is like the disney of consoles, which is not a bad thing, but the disney of console would never release something like an Inception, Black swan, True grit or any other blockbuster movies that has been releases recently.
As always, it will be interesting to see what Nintendo brings to the table, perhaps they can repeat the success from the Wii but I think, even though after the massive success of Wii and DS, Ninty is in an even more thigther spot. More companies are battling now, Apple and Android devices are also competing for our time.
And what will Sony and MS counter with? MS will have an even more advanced Kinect (built in hopefully) and Sony with a tech specs heavy monster?
And what about onlive kind of services?
So to sum up, my point is that Ninty "most likely" will be hurting more this coming gen because they never change "image" wise. It is always the same. Nintendo have to start releasing the "CoDs" and the likes, in order to compete with the rest, in the console space because this time, they will not have a gimmick or their gimmick will not be as different as the rest.
OTOH, Nintendo somehow always manages...![]()
no, people only listen to garbage these days.shadyspace said:People still listen to Radiohead?
Nothing new since the Sony Engineer bit. The French are quiet so far todayplex said:Hey guys, did I miss something relevant within the last pages?
Last thing I've read was about this Sony guy helping Nintendo with CPU stuff and such.
plex said:Hey guys, did I miss something relevant within the last pages?
Last thing I've read was about this Sony guy helping Nintendo with CPU stuff and such.
Shikamaru Ninja said:IGN's Fran Mirabella is stating developers with kits are saying the controller looks like a standard controller (GameCube / Dreamcast) but with an LCD and touch screen fused in the middle.
Fran goes to point that this would be ideal for co-op types of games where the experienced player could be playing on the big screen, while your Dad or little brother who suck, can play co-op with some smaller type of role being played on a separate controller on the little screen. Something like what Nintendo tried to do with SMG co-op. It could be brilliant.
I still can in no way imagine Nintendo getting rid of the Wiimote, especially the pointer feature.Shikamaru Ninja said:IGN's Fran Mirabella is stating developers with kits are saying the controller looks like a standard controller (GameCube / Dreamcast) but with an LCD and touch screen fused in the middle.
Fran goes to point that this would be ideal for co-op types of games where the experienced player could be playing on the big screen, while your Dad or little brother who suck, can play co-op with some smaller type of role being played on a separate controller on the little screen. Something like what Nintendo tried to do with SMG co-op. It could be brilliant.
okay im outShikamaru Ninja said:IGN's Fran Mirabella is stating developers with kits are saying the controller looks like a standard controller (GameCube / Dreamcast) but with an LCD and touch screen fused in the middle.
Fran goes to point that this would be ideal for co-op types of games where the experienced player could be playing on the big screen, while your Dad or little brother who suck, can play co-op with some smaller type of role being played on a separate controller on the little screen. Something like what Nintendo tried to do with SMG co-op. It could be brilliant.
plex said:I still can in no way imagine Nintendo getting rid of the Wiimote, especially the pointer feature.
It would really feel like a step backwards imo.
Shikamaru Ninja said:Well Nintendo will undoubtedly have another type of control method. Whether it be a camera, or a remote packaged alongside it. I am sure.
Yup, that's what I was expecting, and exactly the kind of co-op experience I alluded to a fewShikamaru Ninja said:IGN's Fran Mirabella is stating developers with kits are saying the controller looks like a standard controller (GameCube / Dreamcast) but with an LCD and touch screen fused in the middle.
Fran goes to point that this would be ideal for co-op types of games where the experienced player could be playing on the big screen, while your Dad or little brother who suck, can play co-op with some smaller type of role being played on a separate controller on the little screen. Something like what Nintendo tried to do with SMG co-op. It could be brilliant.
In this case I'd certainly prefer the idea of having the screen as an attachable module for the Wiimote. Two separate controllers just don't seem very reasonable.Shikamaru Ninja said:Well Nintendo will undoubtedly have another type of control method. Whether it be a camera, or a remote packaged alongside it. I am sure.
m3k said:to me it all seems cumbersome... id say that nintendo knows better than releasing something annoying to hold but the virtual boy and the 64 controller say hi
runs away
Andrex said:Yeah, the potential is really huge. And like the 3DS with 3D, Nintendo has attempted this before with GBA/GCN and (to a lesser extent) DS/Wii connectivity. So there is precedent for it. It definitely seems like Nintendo doesn't like throwing ideas away just because they didn't take off at first, but instead tweaking them until they're successful.
Don't think so, most people only hated waggle controls.Boken said:People pissed off at pointer controls... Nintendo makes traditional controller, people pissed off at traditional controls. Yeaaah.
Shikamaru Ninja said:IGN's Fran Mirabella is stating developers with kits are saying the controller looks like a standard controller (GameCube / Dreamcast) but with an LCD and touch screen fused in the middle.
Fran goes to point that this would be ideal for co-op types of games where the experienced player could be playing on the big screen, while your Dad or little brother who suck, can play co-op with some smaller type of role being played on a separate controller on the little screen. Something like what Nintendo tried to do with SMG co-op. It could be brilliant.
I'd rather pay $5 more per controller and have multitouch. :/wsippel said:For the people who fear the $150 controller: According to UBM TechInsights, RIM pays around $45 per 7" 1024 x 600 multitouch screen (BlackBerry PlayBook). Nintendo reportedly uses a smaller screen without multitouch, and will most likely offer a long term contract with a much larger volume. I doubt they'll pay more than $30 per screen. But we're probably still looking at $60 to $80 per controller.
80 buck wouldn't be terrible when you consider Move+subcontroller is that and the Nintendo controller would obviously be packing a lot more in itwsippel said:For the people who fear the $150 controller: According to UBM TechInsights, RIM pays around $45 per 7" 1024 x 600 multitouch screen (BlackBerry PlayBook). Nintendo reportedly uses a smaller screen without multitouch, and will most likely offer a long term contract with a much larger volume. I doubt they'll pay more than $30 per screen. But we're probably still looking at $60 to $80 per controller.
Maybe they aren't ditching anything.From The Dust said:Ditching the wiimote is a bad idea, I think.![]()
Thunder Monkey said:That last page was funny.
Upgradable over time? Are you sure you haven't got that mixed up with the joke rumour of Project Butterfly?Mojojo said:Maybe they aren't ditching anything.
As someone said, the codename Cafe could mean the console is a 'gathering place', a hub of sort for all Nintendo devices (which would go with the rumor that it's upgradable over time :future nintendo products could be used with it). It could be used for the 3DS, DS, with Wiimotes, with the new tablet-thingy control, depending of what usage you have.
Of course the downside is, it's confusing and a lack of single focus can be a pitfall.