SlipperySlope said:More broken controllers = more money for Nintendo.
I have broken more Wii controllers than any other system I've ever owned. I only have one functional controller currently, of the 6 I've bought.
Fun fact: Half of my broken controllers were due to Donkey Kong Country: Returns. Thank you Retro, you've costed me hundreds of dollars.
Another fun fact: Not a single one of the controller throws were accidental. I've actually never thrown a controller accidentally. All intentional. The most recent actually hit my window and the controller fell apart. Surprised the window didn't break. I threw it fucking hard. I then picked up the pieces and put the controller back together. I then grabbed the newly put back together controller and threw it at the hard wood of my pool table.
Works good as anger relief. Fuck you rocket barrel stages of Donkey Kong. FUCK YOU!
I never want to play that game again.
XiaNaphryz said:Didn't care for the Dreamcast VMUs?
apana said:Wii Touch
carlo6529 said:Throwing controllers is not a smart thing to do. I just punch my bed/couch to let steam out.
apana said:Obligatory:
EmmanuelMunoz said:Reminds me of Wii Hi-Fi
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=397945
apana said:WTF?
.in all fairness i'm feeling ya ....kinda ,but i think what you're saying is kinda extreme considering history.ChuckNoLuck said:If this thing is coming out in 2006 and it's more or less Gamecube/Xbox level tech, Nintendo isn't really changing anything then. They'll just think of some gimmick/innovation to get people that don't play games to sort of but not really play games.
And if the PlayStation 3 and 360 are to be coming out before it and the gimmick/innovation isn't good enough...
ChuckNoLuck said:If this thing is coming out in 2012 and it's more or less PS3/360 level tech, Nintendo isn't really changing anything then. They'll just think of some other gimmick/innovation to get people that don't play games to sort of but not really play games again.
And if the PlayStation 4 and Xbox 3 are to be coming out two years or less after that and that gimmick/innovation isn't good enough...
artwalknoon said:This is really my biggest worry. I don't want Nintendo to make a stop-gap console to compete with the 360 and PS3 I want them to define the NEXT generation. If not I'll just stick to what I already have.
Are you implying Nintendo's going to go third-party?ChuckNoLuck said:If this thing is coming out in 2012 and it's more or less PS3/360 level tech, Nintendo isn't really changing anything then. They'll just think of some other gimmick/innovation to get people that don't play games to sort of but not really play games again.
And if the PlayStation 4 and Xbox 3 are to be coming out two years or less after that and that gimmick/innovation isn't good enough...
eggboyapana said:WTF?
So much for a longer generation. Sony and MS is unquestionably going to announce their next consoles after nintendo. And honesty im happy about it. I know alot of you want this gen to last longer, but i want to play games in native 1080p60, real time ray tracing, tessilation and whatever other graphic technique you can come up with. Theres so much room for improvement.Kjellson said:I'm kinda looking forward to E3 now.
wwm0nkey said:Blu-Ray.com apparently caught wind that blu-ray will be used in this new console
Polari said:Makes perfect sense. Nintendo don't have any big games scheduled after Skyward Sword. Do we have any idea when to expect Dragon Quest X? In terms of specs I'm guessing above PS3 and 360 but not a huge leap beyond. I think we're definitely going to see the vitality sensor in there somewhere and seems like there might be a Wii remote style controller in addition to the one with a screen.
I've never thrown a controller, since I am good at videogames.EmmanuelMunoz said:
but actually good advice, it is stupid to break controllers
Marius_ said:Is this true? Cause then I'm so ready for E3.
I never bought a Wii because it never appealed to me but this new console is sounding more and more up my alley.
artwalknoon said:This is really my biggest worry. I don't want Nintendo to make a stop-gap console to compete with the 360 and PS3 I want them to define the NEXT generation. If not I'll just stick to what I already have.
That is what Blu-ray.com is reporting that Nintendo has expressed the desire to use it.Marius_ said:Is this true? Cause then I'm so ready for E3.
I never bought a Wii because it never appealed to me but this new console is sounding more and more up my alley.
High Density Screen is what is likely meant by HD. Many Cell phones use High Denisty screens and they are advertised as HDdefferoo said:eh... the HD screen in a controller theory sounds kind of ridiculous. I mean... how much is each controller going to cost? $100?! They JUST released their next-gen handheld with 800x240 and 320x240 screens. None of which come close to HD resolutions, and we're thinking their next CONTROLLER will have an HD screen?! I don't even...
EmmanuelMunoz said:I have a feeling that It might not necessarily be Next Gen defining graphics, but it could possibly be something involving the system its self or its controls. You also have to remember that Nintendo is not abandoning the casual base it has established, it is simply moving it forward. So to them a small step ahead of ps3/360 is miles ahead of what they currently have
XiaNaphryz said:Are you implying Nintendo's going to go third-party?
DoomXploder7 said:.in all fairness i'm feeling ya ....kinda ,but i think what you're saying is kinda extreme considering history.
Yes.XiaNaphryz said:Are you implying Nintendo's going to go third-party?
wonderfuldays said:Going through this thread from Page 1 is fantastic. I especially want to thank one man again.
DoomXploder7 said:i like how all of y'all areso desperate to think this won't have motion controls and are avoiding doing a wii remote like mockup.
.shinobi602 said:
ChuckNoLuck said:Yeah it might be a little extreme seeing how much Sega effed up before the Dreamcast. Crazier things have happened though and Nintendo's future is such a mystery. I mean, remember when people used to care about Japanese games?
Yes.
I think if it was clearly the natural evolution, uptake would have been more dramatic in traditional genres. It's not like it's analogue sticks, which became the standard almost overnight.apana said:For me motion controller is clearly the natural evolution of controllers. Touch screen can be added but the Wii mote in some form needs to stay.
Just anything but thisIckman3400 said:I could live with that mockup, at least it's not another wiimote.
ChuckNoLuck said:Yeah it might be a little extreme seeing how much Sega effed up before the Dreamcast. Crazier things have happened though and Nintendo's future is such a mystery. I mean, remember when people used to care about Japanese games?
Yes.
DoomXploder7 said:eh going from first(despite core gamers refusing to remember this) to third party seems iffy.
Wait, whatDead Man said:I think if it was clearly the natural evolution, uptake would have been more dramatic in traditional genres. It's not like it's analogue sticks, which became the standard almost overnight.