Lukaku's First Touch
Member
Let's see some of those leopards and bradleys in action baby!
repeat after me.. if it comes out of a Russians mouth its a lie, if it says we lost 10 men, they lost 100, if it says they killed 100 Ukrainians they killed 10.. it ain't fucking rocket sciencewe have yet to see proof either way on this tho so we dont know if real or fake
I don't think we're going to have any doubts as to when the counter offensive actually begins. In modern warfare a large scale offensive against defending positions generally begins with an airborne attack. I'd say we'll know the counter has started when we start getting information and video of multiple cruise missile hits. If it's to be believed that the Ukrainians have hundreds of storm shadows, then they will use a lot of them to soften up Russian positions.
finally a Russian with some balls and equal amounts of brains... jesus Russian men really are fucking inept and useless cunts
Give that woman a medal for outstanding fucking bravery for telling it exactly like it is
Not to mention, oil and coal. Hence the military base in Djibouti.
Anyway, we're far off topic now.
Russia is currently activating various international “pacifist” organizations with the aim of impressing upon public opinion the necessity of peaceful negotiations between Ukraine and the Russian Federation.
russiavsworld.org/a-doub...
700 $ dollars is the cost for a dead enemy. :0
Lots of activity tonight, this looks interesting:
And:
June 5, 2023 Russia-Ukraine news
Ukraine successfully launched offensives in several directions, including the eastern city of Bakhmut in the eastern Donetsk region, a senior official said Monday. Russia said it repelled a large-scale attack to the south of Donetsk.edition.cnn.com
This is fucked up, I bet Ruzzia will say Ukraine did it. This provides power to the Nuclear plant.
I would feel very weird directly funding the death of another person... even if he is a Russan invader.
Yes... taxes... war machine... all that..
Still a weird burden to shoulder.
This is fucked up, I bet Ruzzia will say Ukraine did it. This provides power to the Nuclear plant.
The water probably flowing in the opposite direction nowPretty sure the canal to crimea was dependent on the reservoir. They wont be getting water that way anytime soon..
Yeah, it's allready started in some water ways:The water probably flowing in the opposite direction now
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-56Article 56 - Protection of works and installations containing dangerous forces
- Works or installations containing dangerous forces, namely dams, dykes and nuclear electrical generating stations, shall not be made the object of attack, even where these objects are military objectives, if such attack may cause the release of dangerous forces and consequent severe losses among the civilian population. Other military objectives located at or in the vicinity of these works or installations shall not be made the object of attack if such attack may cause the release of dangerous forces from the works or installations and consequent severe losses among the civilian population.
This is fucked up, I bet Ruzzia will say Ukraine did it. This provides power to the Nuclear plant.
Which side looses the most with the dam blasting? It sounds a bit counterintuitive if Russia did it on purpose as at best it would give a very temporary advantage for Russia. After a few days they are back to similar situation as they were before the blasting with the problem of Crimea basically fucked without a good source of water.
Which side looses the most with the dam blasting? It sounds a bit counterintuitive if Russia did it on purpose as at best it would give a very temporary advantage for Russia. After a few days they are back to similar situation as they were before the blasting with the problem of Crimea basically fucked without a good source of water.
Which side looses the most with the dam blasting? It sounds a bit counterintuitive if Russia did it on purpose as at best it would give a very temporary advantage for Russia. After a few days they are back to similar situation as they were before the blasting with the problem of Crimea basically fucked without a good source of water.
Are you for real?Which side looses the most with the dam blasting? It sounds a bit counterintuitive if Russia did it on purpose as at best it would give a very temporary advantage for Russia. After a few days they are back to similar situation as they were before the blasting with the problem of Crimea basically fucked without a good source of water.
Nuking yourself has to be the dumbest thing ever done.