Sure, OGF is certainly not for everyone and while I loved Drive (in my all time top 10), OGF was def. not for me.
Depends on what genres you like really, or simply if you want to see different sides of him.
Crazy Stupid Love: Fun movie with a great cast. Emma Stone, Julianne Moore, Marisa Tomei and Steve Carell. Romcoms are generally really bad but I really enjoyed this one. One of the reasons being Gosling, he plays this very cool playboy and has great chemistry with Stone (and Carell as well). This is one of his movies the general audience likes. This and The Notebook I would recommend watching with your gf/date. Or just on your own if you don't mind.
Blue Valentine: Heart breaking, incredibly acted and put together drama about a couple. Derek Cianfrance (who also directed Place beyond the pines) beautifully paints this picture about a couple while they are falling in love and switches to them as an older couple where they basically hate each other. It is very relatable (if you've ever been in an actual relationship) and just overall great. Michelle Williams is also amazing in this movie.
Lars and the Real girl and Half Nelson: Maybe not for everyone, but these def. show how good he is. While he got an Oscar nom for Half Nelson, I think his performance in Lars and the Real girl is impeccable. His mannerisms, the way he speaks, looks etc. He was that character and made the movie work.
Fracture: Underrated movie imo, I really enjoyed it and Anthony Hopkins is also great in this.
The Believer: He was young in this one, but really great. Playing a young Jewish man who develops this anti-Semitic philosophy.
That was a film I liked him in.He was electric in Lars and the Real Girl, just a fantastic performance.
Nope and nope.
Well almost no movie that comes out is needed. But a group of talented people collaborating on big budget (I assume) sci-fi is cause for excitement imo.I think a lot of people could agree to the fact that some classics, do not need sequels or spiritual reboots.
Sure, OGF is certainly not for everyone and while I loved Drive (in my all time top 10), OGF was def. not for me.
Depends on what genres you like really, or simply if you want to see different sides of him.
Crazy Stupid Love: Fun movie with a great cast. Emma Stone, Julianne Moore, Marisa Tomei and Steve Carell. Romcoms are generally really bad but I really enjoyed this one. One of the reasons being Gosling, he plays this very cool playboy and has great chemistry with Stone (and Carell as well). This is one of his movies the general audience likes. This and The Notebook I would recommend watching with your gf/date. Or just on your own if you don't mind.
Blue Valentine: Heart breaking, incredibly acted and put together drama about a couple. Derek Cianfrance (who also directed Place beyond the pines) beautifully paints this picture about a couple while they are falling in love and switches to them as an older couple where they basically hate each other. It is very relatable (if you've ever been in an actual relationship) and just overall great. Michelle Williams is also amazing in this movie.
Lars and the Real girl and Half Nelson: Maybe not for everyone, but these def. show how good he is. While he got an Oscar nom for Half Nelson, I think his performance in Lars and the Real girl is impeccable. His mannerisms, the way he speaks, looks etc. He was that character and made the movie work.
Fracture: Underrated movie imo, I really enjoyed it and Anthony Hopkins is also great in this.
The Believer: He was young in this one, but really great. Playing a young Jewish man who develops this anti-Semitic philosophy.
Ok this has potential.Woah woah woah, Deakins is shooting this and Villeneuve is directing? Fuck yeah, this is gonna be great.
Sure, OGF is certainly not for everyone and while I loved Drive (in my all time top 10), OGF was def. not for me.
Depends on what genres you like really, or simply if you want to see different sides of him.
Crazy Stupid Love: Fun movie with a great cast. Emma Stone, Julianne Moore, Marisa Tomei and Steve Carell. Romcoms are generally really bad but I really enjoyed this one. One of the reasons being Gosling, he plays this very cool playboy and has great chemistry with Stone (and Carell as well). This is one of his movies the general audience likes. This and The Notebook I would recommend watching with your gf/date. Or just on your own if you don't mind.
Blue Valentine: Heart breaking, incredibly acted and put together drama about a couple. Derek Cianfrance (who also directed Place beyond the pines) beautifully paints this picture about a couple while they are falling in love and switches to them as an older couple where they basically hate each other. It is very relatable (if you've ever been in an actual relationship) and just overall great. Michelle Williams is also amazing in this movie.
Lars and the Real girl and Half Nelson: Maybe not for everyone, but these def. show how good he is. While he got an Oscar nom for Half Nelson, I think his performance in Lars and the Real girl is impeccable. His mannerisms, the way he speaks, looks etc. He was that character and made the movie work.
Fracture: Underrated movie imo, I really enjoyed it and Anthony Hopkins is also great in this.
The Believer: He was young in this one, but really great. Playing a young Jewish man who develops this anti-Semitic philosophy.
Crazy Stupid Love is a fun film. I couldn't stand him in Fracture, mr chewing gum. I've see him in too many films were he just stares, Place Beyond the Pines, Drive and Only God Forgives. Not sold on him yet.
Anyway, the director on this film. Hell yeah. Very optimistic.
Not a fan of Romcoms in general, and single as a line in the sand right now... but I'll keep those in mind for another time.
Just thinking about how awesome Anthony Hopkins is, so think I'm going to go for Fracture, thanks!
Is Vangelis back for the soundtrack?
Nobody knows.
He probably shouldn't be, honestly.
Watch The Believer if you want less staring and more talking. Blue Valentine as well.Crazy Stupid Love is a fun film. I couldn't stand him in Fracture, mr chewing gum. I've see him in too many films were he just stares, Place Beyond the Pines, Drive and Only God Forgives. Not sold on him yet.
Anyway, the director on this film. Hell yeah. Very optimistic.
Nobody knows.
He probably shouldn't be, honestly.
Nobody knows.
He probably shouldn't be, honestly.
John Williams shouldn't be back for SW either.
John Williams shouldn't be back for SW either.
Why deny the possibility of having something good at all just because it might not live up to expectations?I like Gosling, but I really wish they weren't making a sequel to this movie.
A REAL HUMAN BEING AND A REAL HERO
Okay, suddenly I am potentially interested in this. It's just, well, Deckard better not be some kind of old fucking replicant, uh-uh, no no, that's for sure. The idea is such a stupid and pointless 'twist' that ONLY exists to make fanboys look for clues and feel smart.
I know Ridley's take on it, so I can only hope and pray that it is never referenced in this sequel.
BTW, the twist here is that Gosling is human, right?
It's just, well, Deckard better not be some kind of old fucking replicant
*snip*................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. i drive.
That's exactly what it's going to be.
::sigh::
Headcanon, ACTIVATE!
Seriously though, Deckard being a replicant is on level with ROTJ Vader shouting "Noooo". Totally different changes, totally different situations, on totally different levels, but equally offensive in my eyes.
But is it Voldemort laughing offensive?
But is it Voldemort laughing offensive?
???Since David Fincher is seemingly never working again, Villeneuve should just poach Reznor and Ross to score this movie.
The Blade Runner soundtrack worked as well as it did because Vangelis was trying some out-there shit for the time, and trying to evoke one period of time while simultaneously trying to project his art decades into the future. At that moment in time he created a sound that was unique, interesting, and perfectly matched with that film.
I don't think he can do that again. I think he was lucky to do it the once, honestly, especially when you listen to any of his output past 1986.
Getting him back simply to rehash his Blade Runner score would be boring, and would likely get in the way of the film instead of helping push it forward - and that's not even getting into how cliche some of that shit would appear after the very recent renaissance of retro-futuristic synth-based music. People are saying "Get Vangelis" I think out of reflex, as a way to praise his work on the original film, but not because they're actually fans of Vangelis and his work.
They can get someone better. Hopefully they will.
I can see that argument being made (and have seen it already in a couple spots) once the movie comes out. I don't know that I'm inclined to agree as of yet, but there are some who argue that there are composers making Williams-style music better than Williams right now.
Since David Fincher is seemingly never working again, Villeneuve should just poach Reznor and Ross to score this movie.
Trent Reznor should do the soundtrack.
.
There are many arguments to be made against even the mere idea of a "Blade Runner" sequel. Ridley Scott's 1982 movie is stonecold classic, one the pinnacles of the sciencefiction genre, and frankly, a followup could only pale by comparison. But Alcon Entertainment are doing everything they can to get fans to put their guard down.
First, they hired Denis Villeneuve ("Sicario," "Prisoners") to direct the movie, then they landed Ryan Gosling to star opposite the returning Harrison Ford. Those three names alone would be enough to get us to watch any movie, but that it's a "Blade Runner 2," well, I'm curious to see where it goes.
Alcon has officially announced that production will be begin in July, with Warner Bros. distributing the picture stateside and Sony around the globe. No word yet on an exact release date, but this near the top of our list for 2017. And don't forget, Villeneuve already has a movie in the can, the scifi "Story Of Your Life" which I'd put good money on for Cannes. Check out the press release below.
LOS ANGELES, CA, JANUARY 25, 2016 Sony Pictures Releasing International will distribute Alcon Entertainments followup to Ridley Scotts 1982 masterpiece BLADE RUNNER in all overseas territories in all media; with Warner Bros. Pictures distributing in North America and Canada through its output agreement with Alcon, it was announced by Alcon cofounders and coCEOs Andrew Kosove and Broderick Johnson.
Denis Villeneuve is directing the film starring Ryan Gosling (The Big Short) and Harrison Ford (Star Wars) who is reprising his role as Rick Deckard. Hampton Fancher (cowriter of the original) and Michael Green have written the original screenplay based on an idea by Fancher and Ridley Scott. The story takes place several decades after the conclusion of the 1982 original.
Alcon Entertainment acquired the film, television and ancillary franchise rights to BLADE RUNNER in 2011 from the late producer Bud Yorkin and Cynthia Sikes Yorkin to produce prequels and sequels to the iconic sciencefiction thriller. Cynthia Sikes Yorkin will produce along with Johnson and Kosove. Bud Yorkin will receive producer credit.
Frank Giustra and Tim Gamble, CEOs of Thunderbird Films, will serve as executive producers. Ridley Scott will also executive produce.
The film marks Villenueves third collaboration with 13time Oscar nominee Roger Deakins, who will serve as cinematographer, following Alcons Prisoners and the hit drugtrafficking drama Sicario, which brought Deakins his latest Oscar nomination.
Principal photography on Villenueves new BLADE RUNNER film is scheduled to begin in July 2016.
States Kosove and Johnson: We are excited to work with Tom Rothman, Michael Lynton and then entire Sony team on this very special project as well as maintaining our important and longstanding relationship with our domestic partner Warner Bros. Pictures.
States Tom Rothman: At Sony, we have made a strong commitment to the international marketplace. We know of few projects with greater international potential than the long dreamed of sequel to Blade Runner, especially given the allstar creative team Andrew and Broderick have assembled. We are deeply grateful to everyone at Alcon, Denis and Ridley for entrusting us with such a gift. Working on a Blade Runner film also fulfills a longtime personal ambition, as I deeply love and admire the original.
Among its many distinctions, BLADE RUNNER has been singled out as one of the greatest movies of all time by innumerable polls and media outlets, and overwhelmingly as the greatest sciencefiction film of all time by a majority of genre publications.
Released in 1982 by Warner Bros. Pictures, BLADE RUNNER was adapted by Hampton Fancher and David Peoples from Philip K. Dick's novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and was directed by Ridley Scott, following his landmark film, Alien. The film was nominated for two Academy Awards (Best Visual Effects, and Best Art Direction) and is now regarded by media and cineastes as one of the greatest movies of all time and the defining vision of the cyberpunk genre.
In 1993, BLADE RUNNER was selected by the Library of Congress for preservation in the United States National Film Registry as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant." The film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry in 1993 and is frequently taught in university courses. In 2007, it was named the 2nd most visually influential film of all time by the Visual Effects Society.