I know it's the example so many people point to but it's crazy how the CGI from 2006 Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean blows away current Marvel stuff. But it's because there are so many individual effects in the films these days that even if the technology has improved overall less time can be spent on each individual effect because there's now so much to do.They’ve gone full George Lucas at this point. I’d say the shift started heavy around Civil War. The whole airport scene looked so bad at times. Especially Ironman with the mask off.
VFX artists aren't unionised either. Also the people directly making the Marvel films have less creative control than those making other films and if a whole bunch of it is CGI then the studio can tweak things even after filming is done.the reason is that this way models and props don't need to be finalised and produced in pre-production, but taken care in post
it is more expensive most likely, but they have the money.
Funny thing is that nowadays we would irradiate blood from a related donor to prevent a rare but fatal complication. The older irradiators use gamma radiationIn the comics she’s in a car accident and gets a blood transfusion from her cousin Bruce Banner.
That looks like completely shit.
Yeah that's not what I meant at all. I'm saying I would understand YOU having the opinion that they have missed once or twice, but I wouldn't understand the opinion of them missing "all the time".^Libs of NeoGaf with a flippy flop
They don't miss to they do miss in a matter of hours. I think what you are missing is integrity.
She's been sent to the gulag for free thinking.This role was meant for Gina Carrano.
If she could act and be 15 years younger imagine Torrie Wilson in the role.She's been sent to the gulag for free thinking.
The extent to which Marvel uses CGI is baffling. Why does a guy standing around at a party have to be done with CGI?
They’ve gone full George Lucas at this point. I’d say the shift started heavy around Civil War. The whole airport scene looked so bad at times. Especially Ironman with the mask off.
the reason is that this way models and props don't need to be finalised and produced in pre-production, but taken care in post
it is more expensive most likely, but they have the money.
Yeah, it's getting a bit overboard with Marvel. A straightforward table conversation can be all blue screen too.
Even CG artists have complained about Marvel's overabundance of CG, even in very minor scenes.Yeh totally, That bar scene from Black Widow was another I had in mind. I get that these are films/shows that involve lots of things exploding, crazy tech and other things you'd want CGI for so it's understandable that it's used a lot. But they're using it for things that don't need it. Why does two people sitting in a bar have to be done with special effects? Even Tom Holland and Jon Favreau standing at a graveyard in the most recent Spider-Man used CGI. I'd heard the reason is because VFX artists are non-union and I'd also guess that it then allows the studio to make changes since the people directly making Marvel films get a lot less creative input than with other films.
As another example, even this gun is fake
Was that "adult orphan" comment aimed at Black Widow?What i cant understand is:
Why do they always have to "shittalk" about the other Super heros and downgrade them just to show how badass the woman version of it is?
I simply dont get it.
Mark Ruffalo hulk and Edward Norton hulk are the same Hulk.Looks like it could be a funny throwaway type show. Tim Roth being back is weird, I kinda thought they had just disowned the original hulk movie.
Don't forget the wink-wink nudge-nudge "veiled" hate because this show is about a vagina haver.As usual the first page of a thread about a marvel property is more about people's grievances with Marvel itself rather than the property.
Real doubtful. MCU Hulk is very different from the comics and they're not really exploring him(he had mayor character changes off screen) but they rather have him prepare his replacement already it seems.Anyway, here's hoping they give some screen time to Hulk and he starts going savage again, but I'm not get my hopes up.
The extent to which Marvel uses CGI is baffling. Why does a guy standing around at a party have to be done with CGI?
Yep not only that I didn't notice anything wrong with the scene. It looked great whenever I was watching the movieI don't know, ummmm ,scheduling conflicts? Flash is in the movie for 60 seconds, why spend all that money flying him to be on set if he can do it somewhere else?
Did you watch Angry Joe before watching the actual trailer?
Yeah the show looks great despite the shitty CGI.Besides the shitty cg it doesn't look bad.
Yep not only that I didn't notice anything wrong with the scene. It looked great whenever I was watching the movie
That's what I noticed especially with the Marvel Hate. Makes me roll my eyes at the double standardsPeople will find reasons to shit in Disney and Marvel. When watching the films you can't tell that Fury and Flash aren't really there in there respective scenes. I was amazed when I learnt they weren't actually on location.
Hell, look at Zodiac, so much blue screen for that film it's not funny. No one complains about it though.
Spotted the smoothbrain.Love the CGI usage since it triggers the CGI haters. Didn't notice until someone pointed it out lol. Still looks great to me
I personally don't hate the CGI. I simply want what's better for this show. If your show features a mainly CG character interacting with people in real life, there are right and wrong ways to go about it. The CG character presented in that trailer needs a bit more work and what we currently have looks jarring next to Professor Hulk's model. I'm hoping you feel similar and aren't simply satisfied with 'good enough' just so that haters are triggered.Love the CGI usage since it triggers the CGI haters. Didn't notice until someone pointed it out lol. Still looks great to me
Basically my thoughts. The dedicated Disney haters at large on social media are pissing their little pants about the CGI, but we live in a world where the "Arrowverse" exists and its CGI was fucking GARBAGE and yet people still tuned in every week for literally years.Love the CGI usage since it triggers the CGI haters. Didn't notice until someone pointed it out lol. Still looks great to me
I'm talking about the previous MCU films. There was a weird complaint that the MCU uses CGI a ton and how it mostly looks bad. When the examples they shown are totally fine when I didn't even notice those parts of the film was CGI. I seen bad CGI in MCU movies and shows but those examples weren't it. Example the last fight scene in Black Panther.I personally don't hate the CGI. I simply want what's better for this show. If your show features a mainly CG character interacting with people in real life, there are right and wrong ways to go about it. The CG character presented in that trailer needs a bit more work and what we currently have looks jarring next to Professor Hulk's model. I'm hoping you feel similar and aren't simply satisfied with 'good enough' just so that haters are triggered.
I agree with the first point that they use CGI a bit too much. Using it for scenes due to last minute scheduling mishaps or location issues is fine. I don't think all of it looks bad. However, it becomes a bit messy nearly every time you enter the final acts of most Marvel movies. Shang-Chi's ending battle(after the fight between human characters) looked okay but off. Black Widow's final fight(in the sky) looked okay but off. Eternals final fight looked okay but off. I think it would be okay if they put more time and care into these moments instead of being on an Activision-style rotation and release schedule with their shows and movies.I'm talking about the previous MCU films. There was a weird complaint that the MCU uses CGI a ton and how it mostly looks bad. When the examples they shown are totally fine when I didn't even notice those parts of the film was CGI. I seen bad CGI in MCU movies and shows but those examples weren't it. Example the last fight scene in Black Panther.
The CGI complaints is so weird since as you said CW DC shows used cheap effects and noone complained. But I chalk it up to MCU hate. Other movies and shows have a ton of CGI in them and people don't complain nearly as much lolBasically my thoughts. The dedicated Disney haters at large on social media are pissing their little pants about the CGI, but we live in a world where the "Arrowverse" exists and its CGI was fucking GARBAGE and yet people still tuned in every week for literally years.
Seamless CGI is not required for a show to be successful. It just needs to be fun, entertaining, and well written enough to bring people back every week. That's it. Everything beyond that is just bias and nitpicking.
Mind blowing I know
Can't agree. I have enjoyed everything that I seen since Endgame and No Way Home is one of my favorite MCU films. Top 5 or 6 at least.The CGI complaints is so weird since as you said CW DC shows used cheap effects and noone complained. But I chalk it up to MCU hate. Other movies and shows have a ton of CGI in them and people don't complain nearly as much lol
As for Phase 4 in general, I found most of the shows and movies disappointing to Good. The best one though is the one that's the most divisive which is Doctor Strange In The Multiverse of Madness. But that's because I'm a huge horror fan. I hated Spider-Man No Way Home BTW