Johnny Konami said:
Are you certain it was supposed to be satire? I completely missed that vibe about it. Thier opinions seemed to be real enough.
My take is it was satire. Which isn't to say their opinions on the games they covered weren't real, but they were clealry presented in a way that they were making fun of themselves and similiar types who cover games.
Mrbob said:
I only like him when he bags on Nintendo.
:lol
Catchpenny said:
^^^ Yeah, except Tommy lacks the charisma and wit needed for such a role. He's the Mark Madden of videogame reviewers.
:lol Perfect analogy...except I don't mind Tommy, while I'd love to see Mark Madden's fat ass get stuffed into a meat grinder.
Though Tommy saying that Gran Turismo was the best looking game ever home or arcade (at time when Super GT was out) dumbfounds me to this day. Everyone has their own opinion, but that one was hard to take. And some of his reasons for not liking a game are just inane. At least Victor gives what I see as real reasons for why he likes or dislikes something in a game, and even in a game he doesn't like he'll give out the positives that he sees (most people that don't like something will just rag on everything, as if to try and reinforce their point).
M3wThr33 said:
The easiest judge of a qualified reviewer is if they give high scores based on opinion or the game's genre? I'm not a sports guy, but I'll be damned if I would give low scores to Madden because of it. You KNOW Tommy would. It's personal opinions. not general quality.
In my mind, if you're gonna review a game in a genre you have no time for, then you shouldn't feel obliged to give it the median score that everyone else has.
I don't like RPG's. If someone forced me to review say, FFX, I doubt I'd give it more then a 3. I'd simply make it clear that I have no time for the genre or the style of game, and if you feel the same way this isn't gonna change your mind. I wouldn't expect someone that hates racers to give Grand Prix Challenge a 9 just for my benefit. If you don't like it, state why you don't and rate it accordingly.
The problem with reviewing critiera is that there is none. For me, personal opinion is what it's all about. Tell me how you feel about it, while giving me an idea of what your preferences are so I can have a gauge. Other people feel that a man's personal opinion shouldn't matter (huh?), and they should be able to recognize the quality of a game and give it a deserved score even if they're bored to tears by it. That sort of reviewing philosphy makes no sense to me, but I wouldn't want to dismiss it completely. But until there's a reviewing critieria that the gaming media has agreed upon (or even the individual sites and game mags agree upon), it really doesn't matter. But we'll continue to have 6.8 and C- "controversies" until the gaming media finally grows a brain.
DJ_Tet said:
God damnit, this shit was funny too. Go fuck yourselves. For real. You've got no sense of humor, or put the wrong guy on ignore. This shit was comedy gold and completely ignored.
:lol No one laughed cause we all believe Olimario is 5. :lol