Yup. They want that Fortnite money. If they release all of this on PC as well (which they will) if they manage a few hits those revenue numbers will easily break all their records.1. Naughty Dog MP game
2. Insomniac Games MP game
3. Guerrilla Games MP game
4.Guerrilla Games mmo
5. Bungie / new ip
6. Destiny 3
7. Gran Turismo 7
8. Twisted Metal
9. Deviation Games project
10. Haven
11. London Studio MP game
12. Firewalk MP game
Fortnite, Rocket League… I guess everything from Epic is done right.I remember when everyone hated Gaas games and live service content but unfortunately it's where a lot of the money is.
think how microsoft has milked titles like sea of thieves, forza and now halo. Sony has made amazing games but you play them until completion and 99 percent of people move on to rarely return. with the budgets they cost it's just not feasible without having other live service games to bring the steady stream of revenue in.
cant wait for gt7 and I'm confident Sony will do an excellent job starting with tlou multiplayer I just hope the micro transactions aren't as predatory as the past. They have a good idea of how not to do it with the recent halo infinite issues concerning the battle pass.
and stay away from NFTs lol.
Insomniac can make a fun MP game as shown with Resistance. Destiny 3 and Bungie's new IP will also be mega hits, GT7 will also be successful. The rest will be pretty crap.1. Naughty Dog MP game
2. Insomniac Games MP game
3. Guerrilla Games MP game
4.Guerrilla Games mmo
5. Bungie / new ip
6. Destiny 3
7. Gran Turismo 7
8. Twisted Metal
9. Deviation Games project
10. Haven
11. London Studio MP game
12. Firewalk MP game
1. Naughty Dog MP game
2. Insomniac Games MP game
3. Guerrilla Games MP game
4.Guerrilla Games mmo
5. Bungie / new ip
6. Destiny 3
7. Gran Turismo 7
8. Twisted Metal
9. Deviation Games project
10. Haven
11. London Studio MP game
12. Firewalk MP game
Games.10 different services or 10 different tiers, like different combination of the offering? I don't like the sound of it already, there's already PS+ and PSNow, there's also PS+ Collection that's basically a one&done kind of service, and they want to add 10 more?
I honestly don't think it's gonna be a good proposition, for peope who will want just one certain thing maybe yes, but I image getting a whole offering being quite costly. Imagine if Netflix had multiple services, like one for 1P movies, for 1P series, anime, documentaries, 3P shows, 3P movies etc., and all of that had seoerate services for TV, mobile and PC/laptops... This is what I feel Sony is going after :/
And knowin Sony they'll severely screw it up, like, there will be a service for all their 1P MP games which won't require PS+ to play, but all other games or even the same ones which you own will indeed need PS+.
I can't believe The Last of Us factions isn't out yet or hasn't even had a preview.
What do you mean we always loved GaaSSo Sony is now doing everything that GAF hates like Multiplatform release & GAAS & Game Pass competitor![]()
There were some small leaks in the original TLOU II leak.
![]()
Download Destiny 2 and it was amazing 10/10 masterpiece that only Sony 1st party Studio can producedGood for Sony, but after reading for years on forums how all the PlayStation gamers hated them, I am interested to see their reactions
Only ended up proving the point this person "GAF" was making. Move to a subscription model and your business strategy changes to microtransactions/GaaS. You have all the people who said this is OK to blame for that who couldn't see the woods for the trees of how it changes the games being made.So Sony is now doing everything that GAF hates like Multiplatform release & GAAS & Game Pass competitor![]()
You're conflating different things here. A subscription model doesn't necessitate MTX/GaaS. The latter is usually f2p anyway.Only ended up proving the point this person "GAF" was making. Move to a subscription model and your business strategy changes to microtransactions/GaaS. You have all the people who said this is OK to blame for that who couldn't see the woods for the trees of how it changes the games being made.
It promotes it not necessitate it. Why do you think these things are now happening at the same time and the shift in strategy? The latter usually has f2p style games behind a subscription.You're conflating different things here. A subscription model doesn't necessitate MTX/GaaS. The latter is usually f2p anyway.
10 GaaS games not 10 tiers.10 different services or 10 different tiers, like different combination of the offering? I don't like the sound of it already, there's already PS+ and PSNow, there's also PS+ Collection that's basically a one&done kind of service, and they want to add 10 more?
I honestly don't think it's gonna be a good proposition, for peope who will want just one certain thing maybe yes, but I image getting a whole offering being quite costly. Imagine if Netflix had multiple services, like one for 1P movies, for 1P series, anime, documentaries, 3P shows, 3P movies etc., and all of that had seoerate services for TV, mobile and PC/laptops... This is what I feel Sony is going after :/
And knowin Sony they'll severely screw it up, like, there will be a service for all their 1P MP games which won't require PS+ to play, but all other games or even the same ones which you own will indeed need PS+.
Fortnite, Rocket League… I guess everything from Epic is done right.
Single player games have a place on a subscription service. It is not the type of content, but the amount of content that counts and keeps people subscribedOnly ended up proving the point this person "GAF" was making. Move to a subscription model and your business strategy changes to microtransactions/GaaS. You have all the people who said this is OK to blame for that who couldn't see the woods for the trees of how it changes the games being made.
It promotes it not necessitate it. Why do you think these things are now happening at the same time and the shift in strategy? The latter usually has f2p style games behind a subscription.
Yeah this is the only real leak of what they're planning. Its clearly something more than just 4v4 TDM
The real question is whether they want to charge 70 usd for initial access or do they follow Microsoft and put them into a Spartacus tier.
are just multiplayer games this is not what you think it is.10 different services or 10 different tiers, like different combination of the offering? I don't like the sound of it already, there's already PS+ and PSNow, there's also PS+ Collection that's basically a one&done kind of service, and they want to add 10 more?
I honestly don't think it's gonna be a good proposition, for peope who will want just one certain thing maybe yes, but I image getting a whole offering being quite costly. Imagine if Netflix had multiple services, like one for 1P movies, for 1P series, anime, documentaries, 3P shows, 3P movies etc., and all of that had seoerate services for TV, mobile and PC/laptops... This is what I feel Sony is going after :/
And knowin Sony they'll severely screw it up, like, there will be a service for all their 1P MP games which won't require PS+ to play, but all other games or even the same ones which you own will indeed need PS+.
It promotes it not necessitate it. Why do you think these things are now happening at the same time and the shift in strategy? The latter usually has f2p style games behind a subscription.
A single player game somebody plays and completes in 20hrs is less likely to keep somebody subscribed than a GaaS game like Destiny or Sea of Thieves, etc where a player grinds for 1000s of hours.Single player games have a place on a subscription service. It is not the type of content, but the amount of content that counts and keeps people subscribed
Lol halo? sea of theives? It's not hard to just think of some is it.Can you name all these f2p or gaas games on gamepass? Just curious
luckily for them Sonygaf dosnt run the company..it would have just single player souls like and a user base of 500 pplOnly ended up proving the point this person "GAF" was making. Move to a subscription model and your business strategy changes to microtransactions/GaaS. You have all the people who said this is OK to blame for that who couldn't see the woods for the trees of how it changes the games being made.
Indeed it does, if you are only putting out a couple of games a year. But if you add a god of war in say march with some other things and then a horizon zero dawn a few months later etc, people will stay.A single player game somebody plays and completes in 20hrs is less likely to keep somebody subscribed than a GaaS game like Destiny or Sea of Thieves, etc where a player grinds for 1000s of hours.
Lol halo? sea of theives? It's not hard to just think of some is it.
Just remember if you're going to be doing these sweeping tiresome Gamepass meme posts that never hold up, there are over 400 games on Gamepass.Lol halo? sea of theives? It's not hard to just think of some is it.
No, the F2P games usually offer a "subscription" in terms of a battlepass. It also has nothing to do with Gamepass or Spartacus.The latter usually has f2p style games behind a subscription.
Yeah exactly like Control, Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order, psychonauts 2,Yakuza: Like a Dragon ( and all the others) A Plague Tale: Innocence, Ori, Hades, Titanfall2, 12 minutes, ..I'm just taking single player games of different genres....there's re TONS of single player games on gamespassLol halo? sea of theives? It's not hard to just think of some is it.
Yes, they were and at one time GAF hated these f2p mobile games. Now we just pay a sub for them and cheer. The sub promotes that kind of GaaS content just as Live promoted MP games. A subscription doesn't try and get people in your store it tries to monitise these type of games further by having you pay even when you're not buying those shitty mtxs.Fortnite, Warzone, mobile games were all big before the rise of Gamepass. Its just the slow trend of everyone trying to be a service. I don't want to even go into Apple Arcade which is the exact opposite of your argument.
I think the subscription service doesn't have impact the games in the service in one way or another. It just tries to get people in your store. Those stores were already being dominated by GaaS.
Indeed it does, if you are only putting out a couple of games a year. But if you add a god of war in say march with some other things and then a horizon zero dawn a few months later etc, people will stay.
Having a steady stream of content is paramount.