Both have their merits, really. There's just something about those 2006 faces that don't seem quite right. It's really touched up using CG, moe-ified and rounded; It looks artificial in a way, just slightly off. 2002's faces aren't proportionate at times but that just increases its cuteness. Shiori's picture (third picture down) just emanates cute from that oddly proportioned derpy face. Mai (fourth picture down) also is absurdly cute in that picture, even though her face is slightly squashed.
Here is how cajun and frostbyte probably think:
"This is not cute enough. How do we make it cuter?!"
![]()
"Ta-da!
50-63 I think.Yes, to everything in this post
How many episodes are planned?
Here is how cajun and frostbyte probably think:
"This is not cute enough. How do we make it cuter?!"
![]()
"Ta-da!
This place is filthywhy are people defending Kanon 2002? why????????
This place is filthy
It's not that the KyoAni version looks so much better
ahahhahahaaaaa i wish^ That's a photoshop yeah.....?
The eyes of KyoAni's Kanon girls also look lifeless and desolate. Toei's captures more personality and spirit into them.
Here is how cajun and frostbyte probably think:
"This is not cute enough. How do we make it cuter?!"
![]()
"Ta-da!
NONE OF THESE ARE PHOTOSHOPPED!!!!!
I choose to believe otherwise, so I can retain my sanity.
but the people must know before it's too lateDude you can't just post that much Kanon 2002. We could go blind.
Man I can't believe that there are people that defend Kanon 2002. Total and complete failure of basic artistic groundrules do not make things "charming" I'm afraid.
This Kanon conversation isn't really going anywhere and art is quite subjective anyway so I'd rather not go on.
I'll just say that, again, both have their merits and neither is superior to each other. Also, Kanon 2002 more closely mimics the original VN character designs and is more faithful an adaptation, design-wise.
![]()
The middle ones are the cutest.
I can't believe a meaningful discussion like iM@S character rankings was usurped by a discussion on the merits of the artwork in Kanon '02!
Yes, I'm just going to end myself. This is too much to take.![]()
The middle ones are the cutest.
The middle ones are the cutest.
You must stay strong, AKB is just around the corner.
He means, the middle ones are the least terrible.
More Fate/Zero stuff
Surely they have some plot armor laying around somewhere!
This Kanon conversation isn't really going anywhere and art is quite subjective anyway so I'd rather not go on.
I'll just say that, again, both have their merits and neither is superior to each other. Also, Kanon 2002 more closely mimics the original VN character designs and is more faithful an adaptation, design-wise.
![]()
Sorry, I still choose 2002. The 2006 style is just...boring. Its a pretty style overall but its just so boring. The 2002 faces are all derpy but they have a charming look to them. I don't really care that 2006 was drawn better. To me it looks worse and it just reminds me too much of the look of visual novels. Thats what its supposed to look like and thats probably why I dontl ike it.
The Kanon 2002 faces are definitely cuter than the 2006 faces.
The 2006 style is just CGed to death and looks stupid.
Both have their merits, really. There's just something about those 2006 faces that don't seem quite right. It's really touched up using CG, moe-ified and rounded; It looks artificial in a way, just slightly off. 2002's faces aren't proportionate at times but that just increases its cuteness. Shiori's picture (third picture down) just emanates cute from that oddly proportioned derpy face. Mai (fourth picture down) also is absurdly cute in that picture, even though her face is slightly squashed.
why are people defending Kanon 2002? why????????
my god animegaf
Dude you can't just post that much Kanon 2002. We could go blind.
![]()
"Ta-da!
Why does her face have two outlines on the right side?