Square Enix announces Ardina (browser game)

I'm actually a little impressed at how many bad things they managed to put together here.

This game is a hyperbolic rant about social games, farmville, social gaming, shitty character designs and given life
 
What's up with SE any those waifu games recently, even LR is kinda a waifu game did Toriyama took over the whole creative process in the company?

I really hope all these otaku-bait games bomb horribly (fat chance), so SE will realize that it's not the way to regain success. But who am I kidding, people will eat this garbage up.

I never thought I'd want Wada to come back.
 
17 page thread about how sick the character design is and why you should have moved out of your parents household already.
 
Maybe FF15 will be their last big console game. Then we get DQ 11 for 3DS and from here on we will only get smartphone and browser games and the FF HD++ whatever editions.

They will leave the consoles and PC games to their western studios like Eidos, I assume.
 
Does SE even make that much money from this stuff?

cRHb1HP.jpg


http://www.hd.square-enix.com/eng/news/pdf/14q1earnings.pdf
 
So are any of these kinds of games going to be the basis for classic, well-loved and fondly remembered series, or are they cash grabs? Is the world of Ardina well-thought, with a backstory and a history, as well as a future, or is it a throwaway world that just exists for the purpose of this game?

This game could potentially turn out well, but it makes me wonder how many Japanese devs still take pride in their work. I know money is the end goal, but I never thought the two had to be mutually exclusive.

There we go, that's the question that I've been pondering, do they take pride in their art?

...but at the same time I think "Well, if it's cheap, quick, and addictive fun, there's no harm in that." So long as the worlds and stories they create for their more substantial games aren't affected by the ills of their mobile kinds of games, all will be well.

edit: Hah, unrelated, but I remembered the jiggling breasts in Xenoblade, a Nintendo JRPG of all things, so I conclude that having waifus and jiggling breasts does not necessarily mean a Japanese game developer doesn't have pride in their work. It's just for fun.
 
Why do the styles for none of the characters match? Some look shaded, others are flat colours, some have bold lines.. It's a mess of different looks.

So it wasn't just me that noticed this...

Particularly the green-haired guy in the back looks like he just... doesn't belong.

Overall ,I don't know what to make of this.
 
Man, that is like the shopping list of usual fetishes and tropes.

<standard fetish league>
Loli
Shota
Catgirl
Bishounen
Wounded girl (google suggests "Kegadoru"?)

<cookiecutter league>
Fairy/Snake/Insect/Devil/Slime girl
Knight girl (could be a boy too, maybe move up to above tier?)
Mysterious Archer / Ranger / Rogue guy who is probably emotionally distant and dark and broody

Did I miss anything?

Hrm. Dunno.

Seems like your average moneymaking scheme. Oh well. I am thankful that I needn't feign interest in or even pretend to play this.
 
I think it's more telling about these browser games that I hear about their announcement more than I hear about their release.

Also, it looks like Square discovered mid-90s Newgrounds from that art.
 
So while Wada was in they got to the point where they said they would be done with social games on web browsers.

So restructure happens and they change their mind to go back to social browser games?

Makes sense.

Wada was the lesser evil I guess.
 
The fact that "eidolons" are even mentioned makes me terrified that this is some kind of official sequel to FF9 or something.

I know that's a little silly, but frankly, stuff like that doesn't surprise me anymore.
 
I know there's big business for these games, but its still pretty sad to see a once mighty company resorting to so many mobile/browser games while smaller companies like Atlus or NIS even localize the most obscure niche titles with voice acting. Even Bamco is localizing their games.
 
I'm too tired today but I was going to make a thread about SE and their investment in mobile/browser. From my quick look around they had like one game in top 200 top grossing apps on iOS, so that got me intriqued. Will probably do the same on EA too.
 
So while Wada was in they got to the point where they said they would be done with social games on web browsers.

So restructure happens and they change their mind to go back to social browser games?

Makes sense.

Wada was the lesser evil I guess.

Yeah, who would have thought...
 
Yeah, who would have thought...
I really just hope that these don't fulfil their financial expectations either and they'll be forced to restructure again. I mean I'm not saying don't make browser and iOS games but don't make ONLY browser and iOS games. Putting your CFO in charge after the CEO resigns because of bad performance is also the dumbest move ever.
 
Top Bottom