Its like a triple dose rich creamy shit.
First layer is dog shit
Then horse shit
And finally Triceratops Shit
Basically a giant pile of shit!
And here we go. Trekkies who don't understand that their 'type of movie' will not only induce comas into 99% of people who will watch it, but will also bomb harder than John Carter (which would be a better movie by comparison).
Benadryl Cucumberpatch kind of killing my interest in this film.
Even though I wasn't a fan of the first film I will be seeing this ASAP as a hardcore sci-fi and Trek fan and besides I want to be able to wade into the debates about this film on GAF which I suspect are going to be more polarizing that the first film.
I know I've said this before the buzz for this film is really muted here on GAF. While I don't expect the film to bomb or anything (it's tracking well apparently) there just doesn't seem to be the level of excitement that there was for the first film.
Just saw the movie at a private pre-screening today. Glorious, and I thought it was even better than the "first" one. Can't wait to see it again!
What must one person do with or to a man and/or woman to get a private pre-screening?
Unspeakable things!
Got these as well!
![]()
Shitty picture, but it's an ice cube tray!
will they coldly go?
But Abrams talked to the New York Times this week and when asked about "Star Trek 3," he was noncommittal about directing a third Star Trek, aside from saying that his production company, Bad Robot, would produce it. While there are no specific quotes, clearly an exchange (probably not that pullquote worthy itself) took place over the subject. The NYT writes, "He said it was unlikely that Paramount would wait another four years for such a film, in which case his Star Wars schedule would likely conflict with it."
YAY!!!!!!Get it out of that hack's hands. Hopefully Orci and Kurtzman will move on too!
I don't know anything about Len Wiseman, and Giacchino isn't anything special. He can't hold a candle to Jerry Goldsmith, and Dennis McCarthy who composed this.You fool. I hope you're happy when Paramount bring Len Wiseman in and Giacchino bails so you can get fucking Marco Beltrami or some shit.
I don't know anything about Len Wiseman, and Giacchino isn't anything special. He can't hold a candle to Jerry Goldsmith, and Dennis McCarthy who composed this.
Well why don't they get Goldsmith in? Oh that's right. He's dead.
Giacchino isn't on the level of Bernard Hermann either, but that doesn't really have anything to do with anything.
Just putting his work in perspective. His work isn't anything special, so Star Trek isn't losing anything by him leaving.
If Giacchino is one of the best modern-day composers then that's kind of sad.
Just Star Trek and Up.
Hey, let's not have Marco Beltrami hating. 3:10 to Yuma's soundtrack was excellent.
Hey, let's not have Marco Beltrami hating. 3:10 to Yuma's soundtrack was excellent.
And I, Robot and Knowing. Good work for the last two Die Hard films too.
Explains a lot, anyway. You should check out a lot of his other work, like:
Ratatouille
John Carter
Speed Racer
LOST
The Incredibles
YAY!!!!!!Get it out of that hack's hands. Hopefully Orci and Kurtzman will move on too!
YAY!!!!!!Get it out of that hack's hands. Hopefully Orci and Kurtzman will move on too!
You do realize it will still be an Abrams production right? Not going back to your beloved DS9 or whatever. Trek 3 will be another bad robot production with Pine, Quinto, & Saldana.
Is there a point you're trying to make here? First thing's first: get competent directors and writers behind new Star Trek movies, whether they be in the new universe or the old universe.
You may not like Abrams but the idea that the guy who basically revolutionized the entire tv drama genre in the early 00's is a hack is insanely absurd. And he is revived the Trek franchise after it was left for dead after box-office failures and non-existent tv ratings.
The pilot for Lost (which he wrote and directed) was extremely revolutionary and had a huge impact on the entire tv industry.Basically revolutionized TV drama? haha
Star Trek is more than competently directed. You might not like the direction of the story, but to say it's not competent or even good is some straight up shit.
Thanks for that advice Savitar, now kindly stop posting shit like that.
Don't mind Abrams as much as I mind the trio of godawful writers that seem to follow him wherever he goes.
Orci, Kurtzmann, and Lindelof are among the worse things about Hollywood right now.
Competent directing includes story last time I checked.Star Trek is more than competently directed. You might not like the direction of the story, but to say it's not competent or even good is some straight up shit.
In any of the TV shows I've watched, I've never seen any influence from Lost or have heard how it's impacted the industry in any significant manner. In terms of direction and storytelling, DS9 and B5 were more revolutionary than Lost and served to push the TV medium more. His work is hardly original, and when given the chance to make original work, he doesn't care to.The pilot for Lost (which he wrote and directed) was extremely revolutionary and had a huge impact on the entire tv industry.
There is literally no way to deny that.
Orci and Kurtzman are worse than Lindelof.
Not wherever he goes! They aren't writing his next movie.