GregLombardi
Member
Wow this game is really causing a graphics war huh? Guess it's time to upgrade, I hope my 8800 GTS can handle this game on its highest settings, though I only have a dual core. Any thoughts?
GregLombardi said:Wow this game is really causing a graphics war huh? Guess it's time to upgrade, I hope my 8800 GTS can handle this game on its highest settings, though I only have a dual core. Any thoughts?
That makes me sad..I only have a 2.4 ghz dual core. Maybe I need to upgrade my Mobo + GPU + processors? Le sigh. I just got this comp 1.5 years ago!deathberry said:Yea, the 8800GTS is going to struggle on Ultra settings, an 800GT might have pulled through. And depends on what Dual Core you have. Anything @ 3ish GHz should be fine.
You'll never get in! NEVER!Olivero said:How am I for SC2 guys?
i dunno, what do you think?Olivero said:How am I for SC2 guys?
* PC Minimum Requirements:
Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 7
2.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor
1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7
128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card
1024x768 minimum display resolution
4 GB free hard space (Beta)
Broadband connection
Scrow said:i dunno, what do you think?
GregLombardi said:That makes me sad..I only have a 2.4 ghz dual core. Maybe I need to upgrade my Mobo + GPU + processors? Le sigh. I just got this comp 1.5 years ago!
Xal-Shoota said:Heres one...I have a 2.4 ghz Macbook Pro from years ago with the old ass GeForce8600M...(and 4 gigs of ram)..
How well do you think it will run SC. I know Im not expecting ultra, maybe not even high, but I just want to run it at maybe 1280 x 960 or whatever at now mega-low shit settings to get a smooth framerate
(and before you say "no mac beta yet", I switched to my windows 7 partition and updated my beta settings...so hopefully I have a chance for now!)
Much Thanks.
Bisnic said:For some reason, Battle.net is unable to identify my CPU, it only says "AMD Processor model unknown". I hope it doesn't hurt my chances for future waves.
I have a AMD Athlon II X4 2.6 ghz, am i missing some driver so that Battle.net is unable to see that?
Ice Monkey said:by the way, holy hell I remember why I never played any ladder/melee games on war3 or sc despite having bought them several times...I've played more sc/war3 8 player compstomp ffa tonight than sc2 beta.
I absolutely cannot stand losing as much as I do in ladder/matchmaking games. I know, it's just because I'm terrible but it's just taking way too long for me to learn one lesson at a time, i.e: 20 minute games to learn how to defend against DTs as I'll explain. And I have no idea how to apply my beatings to a respectable lesson most times.
I got completely owned in the last game before I ragequit the beta tonight. I had no joke, 30 marines or more, and 5 medivacs. 5 dark templars destroyed my entire resources and i had to fly my command center away, so i retaliate by destroying the toss player's terran teammate with my m&m. terran player's exp and main base were decimated, and what happens? toss drops in his 5-8 dark templar to the teammates base and my marines are gone in less than 20 seconds. I couldnt do a scan to reveal them because he destroyed that command center.
Anyways, I dont even know what to do in the future to counter any of this. ok maybe some missiles near the command center but by the time i notice he's in the base and get my marines there the missiles are dead im sure, and then he'd do exactly like he did this time: moved the DT away for about 10 seconds when I scan sweep and then get back to destroying the base. not only that but now i have to keep a scan sweep available at all times, bypassing any mules or planetary fortress defense i couldve been getting.
Then, what do i do to counter DTs in general with m&m? weren't science vessels what you used before, but now they're gone?
This game wasnt even endgame, i spammed marines as fast as i could and yet he had DTs up the ass and a billion void rays backing them up by the time I was running in with 30 marines for my m&m.
This is basically every game i've played against toss, their tech somehow always ends up winning the game for them, its no wonder everyone plays toss in the beta matches ive played.
I'm getting really tired of blizzard not allowing harder difficulty compstomp or 8-player maps, or if they need to force matchmaking to let like 20-30 thousand people or more in so I can ACTUALLY PLAY AGAINST PEOPLE MY LEVEL, 9/10 games ive played have been against people way above my skill level.
Bisnic said:For some reason, Battle.net is unable to identify my CPU, it only says "AMD Processor model unknown". I hope it doesn't hurt my chances for future waves.
I have a AMD Athlon II X4 2.6 ghz, am i missing some driver so that Battle.net is unable to see that?
Hazaro said:
I watched a mothership on a stream. Brutal unit. So much energy also, spells cost so little.DieH@rd said:Nice, hopefully we will at last see some endgame units [Mothership ]
edit - damn, thats T not P my bad
I heard it only does 80 now? And the Bnet delay/lag/inputlag/delay makes it a hard cast.Milabrega said:Been watching this stream: http://www.teamliquid.net/video/userstream.php?user=FrozenArbiter
Psi storm looks just as devastating if not more so than before.
Tyler(I think that's NonY) tore up some major face with storm when I watched his stream so I dunno...Hazaro said:I heard it only does 80 now? And the Bnet delay/lag/inputlag/delay makes it a hard cast.
zguL said:Speaking of NonY; he is about to play in the SC1 TSL semifinals right now.
Stream: mms://live.teamliquid.net:80 (open with VLC)
Minsc said:It makes sense to me. He's going this these steps:
1) Once you can prove you're CPU limited your framerate is the highest it can get and lightening the GPU load shouldn't improve the framerate, since you're CPU limited.
2) Same framerate across high and low resolutions means CPU limited... lowering the resolution puts less load on the GPU, so frame rate normally goes up if you are not CPU limited.
3) Lowering shaders (normally a GPU feature) increased the framerate by over 100% - should have had no effect if his CPU is limiting the framerate.
So this is either a bug, or shaders include items that are being calculated by the CPU.
zguL said:Speaking of NonY; he is about to play in the SC1 TSL semifinals right now.
Stream: mms://live.teamliquid.net:80 (open with VLC)
Zzoram said:You can also watch in-browser here:
http://www.teamliquid.net/live/
and discuss in this thread:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=388177
InsertCredit said:Thanks guys! Will this be his last major feat in sc1 before switching over?
aww <3Zzoram said:Nony is one of the very few Americans who was good enough to represent the USA at WCG (he won the US qualifiers) and Nony was invited to train in Korea on a professional team. He didn't stay past 2 months though because he had a girlfriend back home he wanted to marry.
real pros choose SC over girlfriendsZzoram said:Nony is one of the very few Americans who was good enough to represent the USA at WCG (he won the US qualifiers) and Nony was invited to train in Korea on a professional team. He didn't stay past 2 months though because he had a girlfriend back home he wanted to marry.
Protoss before ho sauce.Enosh said:real pros choose SC over girlfriends
RubberJohnny said:
Well I think it must be different people because there's hardly any commentary :lolsnack said:I love commentary.
MrMister said:Seriously I don't want another SFIV on my hands where I get so mad at the online community whooping my ass where I quit multi forever.
I haven't played much in the copper league yet so I can't comment on that yet. However, you're only allowed one profile per battle.net account. You also can't delete your profile and start over with a new one. I'm pretty sure this was done to prevent higher ranked players from creating new profiles in order to wail on the less skilled players. The only way for a highly skilled player to beatdown on lower ranked players would be for them to intentionally lose games so that they'd drop into a lower ranked league. Of course, you'll occasionally run into an unranked yet high-skill player but that's expected since battle.net requires these sort of matches as a metric in order to rank new players.MrMister said:For those of you in the Beta who suck at Starcraft in general like me, but still play online, what's the copper league like? Is it full of pros who just want an easy win or are there actually players in that league I have a chance at actually winning against?
Milabrega said:ZealousD may not want to jump the gun on an official thread, I mean, we don't have a release date and well, this Official Beta thread was made in June last year, but beta only started this week.