KaiserBecks
Member
He is my go to guy. Explains his conclusions well and always buys a key of the game, then gives it to his subscribers.Is ACG good review outlet? I've never heard of them before
He is my go to guy. Explains his conclusions well and always buys a key of the game, then gives it to his subscribers.Is ACG good review outlet? I've never heard of them before
You head that gta 6 releasing next year right?I don't think anything will come close to that even next year
UPDATE: I know it's dropped nowI see 88 on MC
Only negative thing I can think of about ACG, and this is entirely personal, is he sounds an awful lot like Stephen Colbert.ACG does the best most comprehensive reviews and doesn't take sponsors or money for his reviews.
Doesn't get good til dozen hours inI think now everyone understands the meme "too much water 7/10 IGN", now its "too much planets 7/10 IGN"
In what way? This cRPG YouTuber says it’s a better RPG than Fallout 4.
Starfield is Bethesda's biggest RPG ever, and it shares even more DNA with Skyrim and Fallout 4 than I expected—but it ultimately falls far short of the greatness of both of those games. The main companions lack personality, quests that have promising starts frequently come to disappointing conclusions, and space exploration fails to feel like a grand adventure. I liked a lot of what I experienced in Starfield, and it's as huge as promised, but it's not the epic space adventure I was hoping for.
I like using the recommended percent also, not just for this game but any game. It's better than some arbitrary score. Simple good review or not.92% is recommended. MC at 90
I always thought most Bethesda games fell into that category.So, it’s a “trust me, it gets fun in a few hours” game? Surprised to see it still scoring so high. I’ll wait for the outlets that were not sent review copies.
where is this magic 91, it has 88/89 and 87 on xbox without the lower reviews we already know aboutIn what world does a 91 on metacritic NOT look good?
It seems like Death Stranding in that way. Some people will love it while others won't. I'm guessing Elder Scrolls or Fallout fans wish they just made a proper sequel to one of those games instead of taking 8 years to make StarfieldIts the first game in the franchise. It was always going to be a little rough around the edges. Uncharted 1, Ass Creed 1, Mass Effect 1 didnt land on the first try either.
This game will still win GOTYs at the end of the year. Critics have to be harsh because of the issues they can ignore, but fans will be handing out GOTYs to this game like candy come award season.
Is ACG good review outlet? I've never heard of them before
Metacritic has some wierd behaviour.Showing 91 for me still, even after refreshes.
Showing 91 for me still, even after refreshes.
It's the unfortunate inevitable with big AAA games. Some people create these radical untouchable expectations that will never be met. Some are very happy. Some were expecting something completely different.The scores are great. But the game was overhyped. At least based on critical reception. There was an expectation among many, and it was fairly clear, that this game would review at least as well as Skyrim did. It's plain to see that it won't. In a year that has seen Tears of the Kingdom and Baldur's Gate 3, along with a number of other high-scoring games, Starfield landing in the score range that it appears to be is jarring when compared to the hype that was being built around it. Doesn't mean the game is a failure in general. It's just the critical reception not matching.
90 for me with 26 reviews in. With such few reviews it can change drastically as new scores are added.Showing 91 for me still, even after refreshes.
Showing 91 for me still, even after refreshes.
Showing 91 for me still, even after refreshes.
I dunno man, I can understand some of the problems given the scope of the game, but all that jank, shitty AI, bland progression, mediocre visuals at times don't make this an instant classic. I can understand the 7.
Will still try it out on Gamepass to see if it clicks.
EDIT: And what the fuck is about the amount of loading screens??
I agree, such as pissing away any goodwill they had left by releasing Fallout 76.Lots of things change in 8 years
Yeah.. this.The score is 87 on OC.
And its amazing that some ppl still never learn. From pre launch of the console to now.I think brand warriors hyping it as the second coming of Jesus for RPGs has something to do with trolling clapback.
Especially all those who laughed at people saying it would not come close to BG3 (aggregate wise).
Still not a disaster by any means given the scale of the game.
Just dropped to 87
Hogwarts Legacy will definitely be included IMO. A fantastic effort from a relatively low-key studio and megaton sales.It seems like Death Stranding in that way. Some people will love it while others won't. I'm guessing Elder Scrolls or Fallout fans wish they just made a proper sequel to one of those games instead of taking 8 years to make Starfield
It will be interesting if Starfield even gets nominated for game of the Year at the game awards. TOTK, BG3, and RE4 are locked in. 3 more nominations available with FF16, Star Wars, Diablo 4 hanging in the background, and we still got 3 more months of releases
I think hes the best but thats just my own opinion.Is ACG good review outlet? I've never heard of them before
Still only 25 reviews thereShowing 91 for me still, even after refreshes.
But reviews are completely subjective. Once upon a time in hollywood got great reviews, its one of the biggest pieces of shit movies i have ever seen. Its all up to the individual. People really need to understand that.i dont think MS aimed for a mid 80 score, for sure Phill ll not be pleased, after Redfall i think MS was expecting this to be at least 90+
Performance seems great all around. ACG mentioned even cards like the 1080ti can get away with decent performance and little bugs.Did someone mention little to no bugs? That's huge news to me.
A few of the space game people I follow and some other reviewers say the space combat is very Arcady and more akin to something like star fox than like Elite Dangerous or wing commander. Another said there is so much fast travel that the ship feels a bit like extra fluff. People who are waiting on a new freelancer are going to be disappointed. Better pray SC actually finishes one day.
So, it’s a “trust me, it gets fun in a few hours” game? Surprised to see it still scoring so high. I’ll wait for the outlets that were not sent review copies.
A very well finished version with performance that hasn't been seen on XSS in recent time... according to DF.Any Series S talk yet?
And here I am thinking exactly the reverse xDYeah, that's it. I was considering buying a Series X for my dad, mainly as a 4k blu-ray player, and to borrow it from time to time for Xbox AAA games like Starfield, but a 7/10 isn't good enough to get a console. Now I'll just get him a 4k blu-ray player.
Showing 91 for me still, even after refreshes.
Showing 91 for me still, even after refreshes.