mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
This is going to be one of those review threads where the game is considered overhyped shit if it doesn't get 90+, isn't it?
How'd you know this was going to happen?
This is going to be one of those review threads where the game is considered overhyped shit if it doesn't get 90+, isn't it?
I’m curious how the console versions will review. Kind of telling we haven’t seen anything from them.BG3 clears. There can be only one
Will have a good time with this though.
One of the biggest TES Lore channels put out their review. They’ve put over 300h in Starfield and still can’t give a final verdict. For now they say it’s amazing and one of the Bethesda’s greats.
Flipped his shit on his mother over reviews? It's just a game bro.
Lmao
I’m not seeing a meta critic for pc… still says tbdShowing 91 for me still, even after refreshes.
yeah i know, but fan base isnt subjective, some % of Xbox fans was expecting this to review way better after Redfalls fiasco, 86 is far from a bad game and i ll play this game on sep 6, but after all the hype that Starfield Direct brought i dont no if 86 ll cut it for some ppl.But reviews are completely subjective. Once upon a time in hollywood got great reviews, its one of the biggest pieces of shit movies i have ever seen. Its all up to the individual. People really need to understand that.
PC gamer is the clue here.PC gamer review CP2077 on launch was 78. I dont belive Starfield is worst than launched Cyberpunked.
Lmao
I pray this is a joke post.
These purple hair teens from era lol
Lmao
I hope for the sake of the future of mankind this is a joke. I also wouldn't be surprised if it's an average resetera user.
Lmao
no way this is real??
Lmao
Same, we could've got 20 or so good planets for a more focused experience, instead we probably got like
200 rock planets
200 gas planets
300 planets with random outposts or animals
300 fire/water/ice/inhabitable planets
Most of the planets seem to be for mining or resource gathering with a few dungeons spread out in some.
Im proud of myself, but honestly after reading some reviews I think it will settle at 84-85
If this was posted here I'd take it as a sarcastic without hesitation but on ree, I don't know.
Lmao
Meristation, biggest spanish videogame website gave Starfield a 5.8 in the review xD
Análisis de Starfield, un juego perdido en su universo
Analizamos Starfield, el nuevo trabajo de los creadores de The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim y Fallout 3 para Xbox Series X|S y PC.as.com
It’s an old copypasta.Flipped his shit on his mother over reviews? It's just a game bro.
It's an old meme.no way this is real??
this was MS's only chance to get a firsty party game to get a 90+ this gen imo
This pretty much describes my entire fear of the game every since announced. I will never understand peoples obssesion like Ubisoft games with MORE BIGGER OPEN WORLD/MORE PLANETS. Fucking stupid. I'd rather explore 1 amazingly detailed planet than 1000 shallow ones.
I'm still in shock
Tbh seeing all the leaks and comments made it look good
I will still play it and make my own opinion on monday
Do we know wich sites didn't review yet?
How'd you know this was going to happen?
Poor guy, probably got banned by Judge already for posting a copypasta.
Lmao
Probably will be the highest ranking RPG of the next 10 years to be honest.BG3 is the best RPG of the year confirmed?!?
87 is not a bad score but i expected better. I want games to be as good as possible so i feel a little bit sorry for Todd and the Bethesda Team.
Same, we could've got 20 or so good planets for a more focused experience, instead we probably got like
200 rock planets
200 gas planets
300 planets with random outposts or animals
300 fire/water/ice/inhabitable planets
Most of the planets seem to be for mining or resource gathering with a few dungeons spread out in some.
"Starting gun"
It'll suck to not have BG4 in the next ten years.Probably will be the highest ranking RPG of the next 10 years to be honest.
Hype is a double-edged blade.
The average is a great score, but the way some people react to you'd think it averaged in the 70s or something.
A game can score very well, better than most even, and some people will still be disappointed.
Why even bother caring about the review score at that point if you're treating an average in the 80s or a 90 like a failure?
This is going to be one of those review threads where the game is considered overhyped shit if it doesn't get 90+, isn't it?
Luke Stephens " It's probably best to ignore the main story quest and focus on the side quests"
Oh ffs.
no way this is real??