SolarPowered
Member
Sorry, it's too easy to get heated at times like these.I'm trying to understand the decision not to indict from the perspective of law. That is all that I'm doing.
Sorry, it's too easy to get heated at times like these.I'm trying to understand the decision not to indict from the perspective of law. That is all that I'm doing.
When a cop goes to cuff you and you pull away, what is it then?
NoncomplianceWhen a cop goes to cuff you and you pull away, what is it then?
I do not live in US, but on the ferguson topic, where most people were enthusiastic about use of cameras on police as a substiute to getting them proper education, training and control, I was that one that wrote that cameras are a poor substitute that will not work as intended, but on the opposite it would/might/probably be the trojan horse so that poor people get to wear cameras IF they want a job or something...
people told me i was dreaming of dystopian stuff... today, I hope that at least the first part of my thesis (cameras wont work, are a very poor substitute to proper education) will be clear to all of those people that didnt like what I said.
i saw the video. you guys still believe that your solution is camera-on-a-cop?
When a cop goes to cuff you and you pull away, what is it then?
You mean raise your hands in a completely non threating fashion?When a cop goes to cuff you and you pull away, what is it then?
When a cop goes to cuff you and you pull away, what is it then?
Noncompliance
You mean raise your hands in a completely non threating fashion?
People are still bringing up the "he was resisting" crap? There were several able-bodied cops there, they could've easily restrained him without resorting to a known lethal technique that has been banned for over 20 years. Or at the very least stopped choking him when he said he couldn't breathe. There's no defense for this shit whatsoever.
noncompliance isn't always met with aggression.That doesn't mean he wasn't resisting. The cop behind him tried to cuff him and he pulled his arm away, same with the cop facing him.
Even if that qualified as "resisting arrest" (which would be ludicrous), that doesn't give the police carte blanche to just kill the guy on the spot. With a banned action nonetheless.That doesn't mean he wasn't resisting. The cop behind him tried to cuff him and he pulled his arm away, same with the cop facing him.
He's questioning why he's being arrested. You do have a right to do that.What's the difference?
You mean I can just raise my hands and say don't touch me now?
That doesn't mean he wasn't resisting. The cop behind him tried to cuff him and he pulled his arm away, same with the cop facing him.
That doesn't mean he wasn't resisting. The cop behind him tried to cuff him and he pulled his arm away, same with the cop facing him.
That doesn't mean he wasn't resisting. The cop behind him tried to cuff him and he pulled his arm away, same with the cop facing him.
The point completely completely flew over your head, we shouldn't expect execution over resisting arrest.
Indeednoncompliance isn't always met with aggression.
Learned something today.Homicide in and of itself is not illegal. Homicide just refers to some killing someone else. If you kill someone during war that is a homicide. If you kill someone in self defense who was trying to kill you that is also a homicide. Here is a pretty good summary.
That said with the video this looks like manslaughter at least.
I get that, but to deny he was resisting is not true at all.
He wasn't resisting but so what if he was? He was noncompliant but he wasn't aggressive or violent with the cops. He actually hands his visible and assumed a posture which meant he was scared despite what he was saying. Any decent and non lazy cop would have gave this guy a talking to, calmed him down, and then took him in if that was necessary after explaining how he could beat the charges he faced. I bring up my uncle a lot in these threads but he's been a cop for more just about 13 years and arrested about 300 people in his career. He has dealt with many Eric Garner's and never resorted to the easy way out in just body slamming or choke holding them. He actually says that a lot of people he put handcuffed on thanked him later while he was off duty for not being another dick cop and explaining how to beat some of these bogus charges they sometimes face. Also you're arresting this guy for allegedly selling untaxed cigs, an offense most officers don't take seriously. Is this a crime deserving of his death?I get that, but to deny he was resisting is not true at all.
It's stupid in general, so people should quit bringing it up. It's not just on this forum, but all over. He absolutely was resisting arrest, period. He was also choked and left to die for no reason whatsoever. THAT is the issue. People bringing up their (incorrect) opinion that he was not resisting arrest and then jumping all over poster who correct them don't help matters at all.Its a stupid point to get hung up on, keep in mind that my first post wasn't necessarily directed toward you.
It's stupid in general, so people should quit bringing it up. It's not just on this forum, but all over. He absolutely was resisting arrest, period. He was also choked and left to die for no reason whatsoever. THAT is the issue. People bringing up their (incorrect) opinion that he was not resisting arrest and then jumping all over poster who correct them don't help matters at all.
It also makes it easy for people to simply attack an incorrect point (not resisting arrest) instead of the actual issue which only gives them more ammo and allows them to disregard the tragedy and cruelty of the event.
It's very similar to people claiming that Mike Brown didn't even rob the store, which is not the case, then people on the other side just attack that point and we get nowhere.
Eric resisted arrest, and Mike robbed the store. Those are facts. Neither of those things means that cops gets free reign to do as they please even up to taking your life and getting away with it. THAT IS THE ISSUE. Not that neither of these men have ever done anything wrong in their entire lives, they both had, but it's entirely irrelevant, in my opinion.
I don't get the point of this hashtag. Is this to point out inconsistencies in policing or are they bragging/rubbing it in?
just wanted to pop in to say i'm alright, going to crash. was nuts trying to get into the city, by the time I got there traffic was already at a standstill in many places and I had to eventually just park my car and walked into the city to join the protests. From where I was, everyone was extremely peaceful and friendly, but man it seemed pretty difficult to keep the protestors together. The police - who were pretty on hands, I saw them shove people multiple times for no reason - kept breaking us up into smaller groups and corralling us off into different streets. We did eventually get to march on the Brooklyn Bridge and shut that shit down for a short while, which was intense.
I don't get the point of this hashtag. Is this to point out inconsistencies in policing or are they bragging/rubbing it in?
just wanted to pop in to say i'm alright, going to crash. was nuts trying to get into the city, by the time I got there traffic was already at a standstill in many places and I had to eventually just park my car and walked into the city to join the protests. From where I was, everyone was extremely peaceful and friendly, but man it seemed pretty difficult to keep the protestors together. The police - who were pretty on hands, I saw them shove people multiple times for no reason - kept breaking us up into smaller groups and corralling us off into different streets. We did eventually get to march on the Brooklyn Bridge and shut that shit down for a short while, which was intense.
"resisting arrest"
People are trying to cling to the law, hanging onto the bare minimum in order to justify this death. Do officers have carte blanch? "I see you being non-compliant and trying to debate with me over there. Oh I tried to cuff you and you side-stepped me, RESISTING ARREST, oops sorry you died!"
The police should have talked him down and made a peaceful arrest, but they instead opted to be aggressive and force him down (partly with an illegal maneuver) and ended up killing him. Of course that's legal, so people will cling to that, as long as it is legal right.
Resisting arrest is taught to officers as an aggressive force toward the cops so they are aggressive back. This is what needs to be fixed. But people need to not resist also.
"resisting arrest"
People are trying to cling to the law, hanging onto the bare minimum in order to justify this death. Do officers have carte blanch? "I see you being non-compliant and trying to debate with me over there. Oh I tried to cuff you and you side-stepped me, RESISTING ARREST, oops sorry you died!"
The police should have talked him down and made a peaceful arrest, but they instead opted to be aggressive and force him down (partly with an illegal maneuver) and ended up killing him. Of course that's legal, so people will cling to that, as long as it is legal right.
Is there a full video of the conflict. I found the one on youtube where they are talking back and forth and it seems there is a time jump to when the man is wrestled to the ground by 5-7 cops.
I do not agree with the choke hold, I am just curious what transpired in that time gap.
There is a full length and unedited video out in the open right?
I mean i hear they did talk back and forth for a long time and all but still. When the Cops decided it was time to cuff him it was like they weren't going to explore any more options
I guess I am only finding the edited one and could not locate the entire raw film. I'm really curious what cause the cops to hit that point of " Ok we need to take him down at all cost, we can't reason with him" mentality
In our use of force model, pulling your hand away is labeled as Actively Resisting and allows the officer to use force to arrest an individual. Not complying, as in not moving at all, is labeled passive resistance and not subject to the same force as pulling your hand away but resisting nonetheless.Noncompliance
In our use of force model, pulling your hand away is labeled as Actively Resisting and allows the officer to use force to arrest an individual. Not complying, as in not moving at all, is labeled passive resistance and not subject to the same force as pulling your hand away but resisting nonetheless.
That's swell. How about fixing your force model?
I do not live in US, but on the ferguson topic, where most people were enthusiastic about use of cameras on police as a substiute to getting them proper education, training and control, I was that one that wrote that cameras are a poor substitute that will not work as intended, but on the opposite it would/might/probably be the trojan horse so that poor people get to wear cameras IF they want a job or something...
people told me i was dreaming of dystopian stuff... today, I hope that at least the first part of my thesis (cameras wont work, are a very poor substitute to proper education) will be clear to all of those people that didnt like what I said.
i saw the video. you guys still believe that your solution is camera-on-a-cop?