Can someone explain to me how this happened? There is video evidence of the officer using an illegal chokehold and the coroner has ruled it a homicide. How the hell is this not going to trial?
Grand Jury must be racist, stupid or I dunno? I wonder what other evidence they were presented on top of the video that made them side with the cop?
My guess is, they framed it as Garner being a criminal with 30 prior arrests. He was someone breaking the law. The cop therefore was just doing his job detaining him and Garner resisted.
All of that might be true, but doesn't excuse the chokehold and excessive force. That is where I don't get how they can side with poloce. Because even if he resisted that itself does not excuse or lead to being put into a chokehold.
I'm kind of curious how this case was presented to the grand jury. If the charges were malicious intent to murder, then maybe while the grand jury didn't like the cop or what he did, they didn't think there was proof of him maliciously or intentionally seeking out to kill him. And with them framing it as Garner breaking the law and resisting arrest...
Only thing I can think of.
America has always been quick to side with the law and have zero sympathy with someone breaking the law. Wouldn't surprise me if this is another case of a jury focusing on him breaking the law and believing that he wouldn't be dead if he only hadn't been breaking the law. If he hadn't resisted arrest. I saw some people on here making that argument.
Problem with that is, breaking the law and resisting arrest does not justify a chokehold. Therefore bringing up that other stuff is IMO victim blaming.