This is the kind of thing I can't wrap my head around. You can support and lift up minority voices without constantly attacking white people. These people preach "empathy" and "inclusivity", but I very rarely see them actually supporting or even saying nice things about the marginalized groups they claim they're helping. Instead, it's just a never-ending stream of vitriol against their "enemies", who it turns out are just regular people who were born with immutable characteristics they don't like.
They do a lot of mental gymnastics to explain why this is somehow okay -- "white men are oppressing us, so attacking them IS lifting up marginalized groups" but this is obvious bullshit, and it's a tactic that's been tried by every genuine bigot since the dawn of time. NO ONE thinks "I hate X group of people, but they're actually lovely, so I guess I'm just a villain who loves being evil!" It's all post-hoc rationalization; your mind will find excuses to rationalize and justify that hatred.
They also have these "white fragility" and "male fragility" arguments they love to make, where (via insidious circular logic) if you're white or male or whatever and you take offense to them constantly attacking you, somehow, the sheer act of you taking offense makes you an even worse person. I'd like to submit that judging people on their immutable characteristics, in and of itself, is bad *for the people doing the judging.* At the risk of sounding cheesy, it's bad for the soul. It means burdening yourself with unnecessary hatred. It means training your brain to use poor logic and a lack of critical thinking. It means closing yourself off to friendships and opportunities you would otherwise have. It's just a bad way to be, and it often hurts the people doing it more than even the people they're doing it to.
In the words of MLK, I'd like to propose that we judge people by the content of their character and not their skin color, but I guess MLK is alt-right now, or something.