Lord Ghirahim
Member
bodyboarder said:
I think reaching the credits takes about 4 hours.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Super Mario 3D Land |OT| Jump Into a New Dimension!
- Thread starter ThatObviousUser
- Start date
I think reaching the credits takes about 4 hours.
Cheesemeister
Member
bodyboarder said:
I went through it as thoroughly as possible the first time through.
Sinthetic said:
Yes. Just don't start from the midpoint flag.
I wonder do people think that the lack of themed worlds is a flaw? I was just reading an article that said that lack of a desert world, grass world, etc was a missed opportunity. But that's something I'm actually glad for. As much as I love the 2d mario games I am bored of the grass world, desert world, fire world progression.
That's how I feel. I hope we get a lot of varied, experimental, almost nonsensical levels that don't have to adhere to a strict theme or be grouped together by a theme. I have seen a desert level and a water level but it looks like we won't be playing 4 or 5 of those in a row which is good to me.Sinthetic said:
To me it sort of is. I like the sensation of adventuring across lands to save the Princess, rather than simply completing abstract playground levels that are arbitrarily divided into a difficulty order of sorts.artwalknoon said:
The lands don't have to be themed with the old-school cliches, nor do they have to be particularly strict throughout.
I think the extra layer of adventure and logical progression encourages one to go back and experience it again, on top of the individual 2 minute thrill rides that aren't so difficult the second time through, if even the first time.
Lord_Byron28
Member
I'd prefer more cohesive levels. I fully admit that I'm not a fan of the whole floating blocks in the middle of space thing(which to me is even less varied that the usual Grass/Desert/Ice/ fire thing). EAD Tokyo seems to think it's the best way to emulate 2D Mario but I always felt Mario(including the 2D one) was an actual world you were travelling through. However, I wouldn't mark it as a negative because it's just a personal preference. This design choice allows for different things to be done than possible with a cohesive theme/world.artwalknoon said:
TheCongressman1
Member
BowieZ said:
I feel exactly the same way. I think that's one reason I don't hold the Galaxy games in a god-like position.
Lord_Byron28 said:
Not necessarily. Mario is surreal enough to fit almost anything into a world theme.
Nocturnowl
Member
I just saw the UK advert for this game and hype levels have increased, why isn't it releasing this week?!
I definitely loved the world of Super Mario World for the SNES back in the day but since then I haven't felt the same about any world or world themes in mario since. For example I thought Sunshine was really held back by its strict adherence to the water/beach/vacation island theme with the best platforming levels being those completely abstract floating ones.BowieZ said:
Even though I really enjoyed NSMBDS and NSMBWii even more the world themes bored me. EAD seems to flex their creative muscles better when they are designing without world themes or maybe the game just feels fresher when I'm not playing 4 lava levels in a row. I'm sure the same creative level design could be applied using themed worlds but I'm not convinced yet.
StreetsAhead
Member
Mistle said:
No, there are a few themed worlds.
EDIT: Whoops, themed levels not worlds. Each world is quite eclectic.
darkpaladinmfc
Member
From the sounds of it there are themed levels, but not themed worlds.Mistle said:
Lord_Byron28
Member
No but from what I've seen the majority of them are blocks floating in space. Nothing from what I've seen are remotely like World, 64, Sunshine or the Galaxies where it seems like an actual living world though.Mistle said:
Yeah, that's one of the reasons why SMW is my favorite 2D mario(don't kill me but I've never played YI). I agree on NSMB series as well but I found NSMBWii to probably be the best technical Mario even though it isn't my favorite Mario. The NSMB series is a little too by the books and I wish that Nintendo tried harder to further evolve 2D Mario because SMB-SMB3-SMW-YI all were significant evolutions and advancements in 2D Mario but it kind of stopped after there. Another trend I noticed is that Nintendo seems complacent and reusing the same world themes over and over again when they could do more than just plains, desert, volcano, ice world, forest, etc.
DKCR was probably the most refreshing 2D platformer I played this gen. It captured the imagination of a liveable world like in SMW as well as constantly and consistently throwing new things and extremely tight level design. If you haven't played it I highly reccomend DKCR. I also think it's the perfect example of how thematic worlds doesn't have to come at the price of good level design. While I do have my issues with things about DKCR, I'd love if Retro did nothing else but do level design for a Mario game.
Slot me in the "don't care about themed worlds" column. I don't need to slog through a set of grass levels, a set of desert levels, a set of ice levels, etc. The freedom to cast any level as the designers see fit lends a much more playful and whirlwind spirit to the proceedings that I appreciate much more than trying to force an imaginary storyline on the thing.
Woohoo, got my copy today!
The production values of this game just blow me away. It seems they've thought of everything to make the experience as consistent and entertaining as possible within the game design.
I've played through the first two worlds so far and while it is lacking a bit of challenge, maybe that'll come in later. Even if it doesn't, the mechanics I've gotten to play with so far have been fun
and I'm looking forward to getting back to it.
Also I agree that 30 fps is a bit disappointing.
And no instruction booklet is
But oh well, it's really not a big deal. The future is digital after all, even for Nintendo, and the game does a good job of explaining things along the way.
The production values of this game just blow me away. It seems they've thought of everything to make the experience as consistent and entertaining as possible within the game design.
I've played through the first two worlds so far and while it is lacking a bit of challenge, maybe that'll come in later. Even if it doesn't, the mechanics I've gotten to play with so far have been fun
(I love the level where the platforms switch whenever you jump, even though it's not new for the series)
Also I agree that 30 fps is a bit disappointing.
And no instruction booklet is
But oh well, it's really not a big deal. The future is digital after all, even for Nintendo, and the game does a good job of explaining things along the way.Found this 1Up trick video (world 1-2) when I was looking for videos of the new ice white 3DS.
MvmntInGrn
Member
Splash Wave
Member
How likely is it that Amazon will get this game to my house on Saturday? Anything ordered through Prime generally arrives in one day due to what I assume is proximity to a distribution center, but I'd almost rather not wait an extra day if that doesn't turn out to be the case.
ThatObviousUser
ὠαἴÏÏιÏÏÎ¿Ï Ïαá¿Ï εἶ
GI added to OP, and screenshots removed. I've been thinking, should I replace the Powerups section with one that details the star system? Some people might want to know about the rainbow sparkle requirements or whatever.
Lord Ghirahim
Member
289 star coins in, fun fun fun.
TheNatural
My Member!
Maddness said:
So you're willing to justify spending $250, plus tax, to play two games - but you're not willing to justify paying for it and selling it when a revision comes out, for maybe a $40 difference in getting an upgrade?
I seriously don't understand the ridiculousness involved when people worry about revisions to a system when they're willing to blow a lot more just to play a couple games, but wouldn't risk a small margin of that cost to sell the system to get an upgraded version.
thecouncil
Banned
Jimmy Stav said:
the saturday BEFORE it comes out?
the 12th?
0%.
I dont think they'll ship it until Monday, even with Prime.
thecouncil
Banned
Maddness said:
haha, yeah, something here is lame. thats for sure.
get it now.
play games.
when a revision comes out, trade it out to decrease the cost.
Look, obviously I want to play those 2 games, sure. But I'm investing in a system for the long term and fully expect to play other games. Resident Evil, Ocarina of Time, Metal Gear, etc. I just didn't think it was really necessary to go into a post explaining all 10 games and future games that may or may not come out that I'll be interested in purchasing. Why would anyone pay that much money just to play 2 games and never play anything else?
I still own every Nintendo console/handheld that's been released here in the US, as well as Playstation/Xbox models. My thing is, I hate revisions. I've been boned in the past on revisions and honestly I'm just tired of buying them only for revisions to come out later (lately very soon after the one I bought is released).
Granted, this is probably all just BS talk anyway, as I've been tempted to buy that Mario bundle since I saw it.
I still own every Nintendo console/handheld that's been released here in the US, as well as Playstation/Xbox models. My thing is, I hate revisions. I've been boned in the past on revisions and honestly I'm just tired of buying them only for revisions to come out later (lately very soon after the one I bought is released).
Granted, this is probably all just BS talk anyway, as I've been tempted to buy that Mario bundle since I saw it.
ThatObviousUser
ὠαἴÏÏιÏÏÎ¿Ï Ïαá¿Ï εἶ
Is it worth it to put them in the OP?