• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Superman | Official Teaser Trailer (6am PT/9am ET 12/19)

ManaByte

Gold Member
The trailer is still trending #1 on YouTube after 2 days
GfUoCBzaAAA8AKQ
 

Synastry

Member
As someone that's still waiting for MOS 2 with Henry Cavill and superman is my favorite hero ever I have no interest in this movie.

Kinda looks like the 2006 superman movie and that movie wasn't that good.
 
Last edited:

Doom85

Member
Their comics have made a huge comeback, with the Absolute universe launch being HUGE (Absolute Batman is the top selling comic of 2024)

I’m a trade reader, so I haven’t read the Absolute comics yet, but I’m looking forward to them. I’ve heard Absolute Wonder Woman is becoming a lot of readers’ surprise favorite even with Absolute Batman being helmed by longtime Batman writer Scott Snyder. Absolute Superman is supposed to be good too. I’ve heard the crazy angle they’re supposedly going for with Absolute Martian Manhunter once that series starts and it sounds great.

Really wish they had picked another adjective though. They already use Absolute as their brand name for their highest quality hardcover releases, with the best paper quality and as much bonus content as possible, of specific miniseries and runs (basically their Criterion Collection). So what, we could possibly get someday a release of Absolute Batman: The Absolute Edition? Oof.

Marvel’s new Ultimate universe has been great so far (again, I’m a trade reader, only the first volumes are out so far). Jonathan Hickman’s Ultimate Spider-man is excellent, like holy crap. Ultimate X-men is insanely different, but I’m down with what they’re doing so far. Ultimate Black Panther is the “weakest”, still good though, I do like the enemies being connected to Moon Knight in a way which is interesting. I need to get the first Ultimates volume if it’s out yet.
 

Synastry

Member
But no one is demanding they go and dig up Reeve's corpse to make a new movie.
I think your missing the point.

Playing the role of superman is a iconic role people become attached to the actor and so the person playing superman becomes there favorite superman which is why I said Christopher Reeve to many is still there favorite superman just like to many me include Henry Cavill is my favorite superman.
 

Ulysses 31

Member
-Awful take on Peter Parker (the comic fans have been begging for Peter to grow up already and move forward with his personal life, Across the Spider-verse does so and Drinker whines about him being a dorky dad, ah yes, Peter being a dork, that’s never been a thing! Also, he’s wearing his bathrobe because Miles wasn’t supposed to leave his dimension, thus Peter had no reason to suspect an incident would happen at their own HQ that would require his own involvement given the HUNDREDS of Spidey variants on site, come on, try to keep up, Drinker Man)
Maybe, didn't watch Into the Spider Verse because of the low framerate animation annoyed met too much.
-his “review” of The Boys Season 4. Like, what are we even going here?
It wasn't a review, it was a video on why he wouldn't watch and review season 4.
-his exposure as someone who values pushing his political views far more than actually being a critic as seen in his The Batman review (“aside from one line from Catwoman, the movie isn’t actually about race”. SpongeBob Narrator: A FEW MINUTES LATER “And I must say, it’s strange how all the Riddler’s targets are rich upper class men who are corrupt and all white”.

…….*sigh*

The mayor candidate of Gotham is a white man?

xsbqLrm.jpeg


Someone should inform Jayme Lawson, that’ll come as quite the shock to her!
To my understanding he was playing devils advocate("If I was a cynical man") when answering if the movie was woke or not and that's when he said that about white and corrupt people. But he concluded it doesn't dominate the narrative so the movie is his opinion is not about race.
Bruce Wayne and Thomas Wayne aren’t corrupt, the former should be obvious to anyone because it’s BRUCE WAYNE, and the latter’s innocence being proven is kind of a big point of the movie.

It’s a blatant case of Drinker either not paying attention to the movie very well, a bad look for someone who is supposed to be reviewing a film, or he chose to lie to his audience in order to push his politics. All while the political angle he goes for he flat out admits elsewhere in the review is not relevant to the film AKA Drinker saying, “the film isn’t actually about race”. Either way, not a great look.
Not sure where you're pulling this from, questioning his family legacy is the closest thing Drinker says about being corrupt.
That’s the dangerous nature of going all in in trusting a media influencer. If you don’t actually watch the film, show, etc. you’re watching the influencer discuss, you have put blind faith into a person and are assuming they’re getting the details right, and you are allowing them to influence your opinion on something you haven’t even watched/played/read (or you only remember to some extent, and let the influencer affect your recollection of certain moments even if it’s inaccurate). I enjoy Nostalgia Critic, but I never watch his reviews for something I have not seen myself, as he has sometimes gotten details way off that significantly influenced his opinion. His Event Horizon review had him mistakenly believes Laurence Fishburne and his team are scientists (they’re not, they are a rescue team, only Sam Neill is the scientist in the film) and so many of his complaints rest on that false conclusion.
I don't think anyone is advocating blindly trusting Critical Drinker or any social media influencer. He's not infallible. Critical thinking and a healthy dose of skepticism of opinions/claims made online is generally good advice.
 

FunkMiller

Member
Looking across the internet it's becoming apparent that this film is the latest salvo in a tiresome, pointless, childish, idiotic war between mindless James Gunn fans and mindless Zack Snyder fans - with neither side able to in any way accept any flaws that 'their guy' has, lest they give ammunition to the other side. It's all overblown hyperbole and performative nonsense.

This trailer was okay. It is not perfect. The Man Of Steel trailer was better, but the film wasn't great. I hope Gunn's movie is better.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
If a superdog is running around, this movie will definitely be filled with comedic pet scenes. No doubt it'll be a much different vibe than Man of Steel and Superman Returns.
 
Last edited:

FunkMiller

Member
If a superdog is running around, this movie will definitely be filled with comedic pet scenes. No doubt it'll be a much different vibe than Man of Steel and Superman Returns.

Which is the correct thing to do, to give Gunn credit. Mopey Superman failed. Twice. This feels like the first Superman film in years that isn't influenced by Batman films.
 
Last edited:

Ulysses 31

Member
Which is the correct thing to do, to give Gunn credit. Mopey Superman failed. Twice. This feels like the first Superman film in years that isn't influenced by Batman films.
Bit too early to give credit, Superman comes across mopey too in parts of in the teaser and there's no shot of him smiling.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Which is the correct thing to do, to give Gunn credit. Mopey Superman failed. Twice. This feels like the first Superman film in years that isn't influenced by Batman films.
Fair point.

Maybe the Superman vibe for viewers is to have more fun like the Reeves movies. Whereas super serious Bale Batman vibes are a turnoff and should stick with Batman.

For me, I like Bale kinds of movies. But I can see people looking a more lively Superman movie. Even right off the bat, the story in Superman will always be more comedic with the whole nerdy Clark Kent hidden identity plot line.
 

FunkMiller

Member
Bit too early to give credit, Superman comes across mopey too in parts of in the teaser and there's no shot of him smiling.

Plenty of footage behind the scenes of him hugging kids, and you just know there's going to be some sort of 'who's a good boy then?' moment with Krypto. Add that to the slightly goofy costume deliberately designed to be appealing to children, and Gunn's film making sensibilities, and I think we can be guaranteed of a Superman that's a lot more upbeat and kid friendly than either Singer's or Snyder's.
 

Hugare

Member
Which is the correct thing to do, to give Gunn credit. Mopey Superman failed. Twice. This feels like the first Superman film in years that isn't influenced by Batman films.
I dont think Snyder's Superman "failed" by any means. Man of Steel was easily the best DC movie from that universe, and Cavill was a very loved Superman by many fans.

Unfortunately, every other DC movie with Superman in it sucked. It was just very unfortunate that Cavill's Superman had to deal with those weak other characters and terrible writting.

I loved Snyder's concept for Superman. Of him being afraid of what society could think of him, and the consequences of it. Felt realistic and grounded. People would initialy fear him, and it would take time for people to trust him, government would try to control him and etc., so it was an interesting take, imo.

Same concept every goddamn time is ass. I love people taking swings with some risky concepts even when they fail.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
I dont think Snyder's Superman "failed" by any means. Man of Steel was easily the best DC movie from that universe, and Cavill was a very loved Superman by many fans.

Unfortunately, every other DC movie with Superman in it sucked. It was just very unfortunate that Cavill's Superman had to deal with those weak other characters and terrible writting.

I loved Snyder's concept for Superman. Of him being afraid of what society could think of him, and the consequences of it. Felt realistic and grounded. People would initialy fear him, and it would take time for people to trust him, government would try to control him and etc., so it was an interesting take, imo.

Same concept every goddamn time is ass. I love people taking swings with some risky concepts even when they fail.
I liked MoS. Except for the final fight which was retarded. It lasted 6 or 7 minutes straight of punching each other.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
The plan for JL 2 and 3 would have Bruce Wayne cuck Clark by knocking up Lois Lane. Then Darkseid would boom tube into the Batcave and brutally slaughter the pregnant Lois. Superman goes crazy and starts killing everyone. That’s a terrible concept for Superman.
I'm okay with this if there were more mainstream DC films as well. A grimdark DC aint inherently a bad thing as a bit of adult fun.
 

Hugare

Member
The plan for JL 2 and 3 would have Bruce Wayne cuck Clark by knocking up Lois Lane. Then Darkseid would boom tube into the Batcave and brutally slaughter the pregnant Lois. Superman goes crazy and starts killing everyone. That’s a terrible concept for Superman.
As I said, I loved the concept of a Superman fearing how society would receive him and all that it would entails. It wasnt something explored before in Superman movies to that extent, so it was interesting.

Execution and the exploration of this concept is another thing entirely. I still loved MoS, tho. Everything else was shit.
 

GloveSlap

Member
A lot of people don't seem to like how much is going on, but that's honestly what i like about it. Just off the trailer it feels really big with lots of world building. Superman should have a batshit crazy life and i'm here for it.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom