ComputerMKII
Banned
This is the wrong way if you wanna stay in the EU.
The Front National hates the EU, the Euro and wants to leave both...
This is the wrong way if you wanna stay in the EU.
Not an expert on them, but I'm pretty sure the FN want out of the EU.
Except the guy that started this conversation on Sky, the guys that executed this attack and so many, many, many other people justifying the attack because Charlie Hebdo insulted their prophet.You can draw anything you want. You can draw anything you want. You can draw anything you want. No one is arguing for censorship or something not existing.
The Front National doesn't want to stay in the EU.This is the wrong way if you wanna stay in the EU.
Charlie Hebdo's lawyer just said that the next issue would be printed at 1 million copies (instead of the regular 60 thousand).
I think good satire challenges hypocrisies, flaws, abuses and so on in things that are normally seen as untouchable. Satirizing religions, including Islam, is entirely appropriate in that context. That it is a minority religion in Western countries doesn't seem necessarily relevant to me. Satirists had a field day with communist parties around a century ago for instance, and they certainly weren't in power in any of the countries where they were mocked.Yes, it's more painful, so we agree on that. That also means that when we talk about satire, then what I personally would consider to be good satire would be satire that challenged or questioned those in power, whereas bad satire (to me) went out of its way to ridicule people who are already discriminated against and who are already exposed to a lot of ridicule and stigmatization and oppression in their daily lives. That does not at all mean that the latter doesn't deserve to exist - I am only saying it is possible to criticize it for being bad - i.e. my point is that freedom of speech does not entail freedom from criticism.
The Front National hates the EU, the Euro and wants to leave both...
The Front National is asking for a referendum on the return of the death penalty (Source: BFMTV)
Die beiden Verdächtigen sollen sich in einer Wohnung im Ort Crépy-en-Valois verschanzt haben, berichtet der Sender France 3 Picardie unter Berufung auf lokale Behörden. Polizeiwagen seien vor Ort.
The Front National is asking for a referendum on the return of the death penalty (Source: BFMTV)
See my point about rising above petty bullshit.The Front National is asking for a referendum on the return of the death penalty (Source: BFMTV)
I think good satire challenges hypocrisies, flaws, abuses and so on in things that are normally seen as untouchable. Satirizing religions, including Islam, is entirely appropriate in that context. That it is a minority religion in Western countries doesn't seem necessarily relevant to me. Satirists had a field day with communist parties around a century ago for instance, and they certainly weren't in power in any of the countries where they were mocked.
Exactly. This kind of stuff is expected from Lepen. No need to dwell on that.See my point about rising above petty bullshit.
Of course i can see where they come from but that doesn't mean that they're right.
And it is pretty similiar to us germans. In the 1950s-60s our nazi past was silenced to death, no one was allowed to talk about it let alone joke about it. Society didn't allowed it. But we learned (And i think that this kind of short coming in the islamic world) to laugh about ourselves and our past. We make jokes about catholic priests being pedophiles (even the pope), we make jokes about hitler and the cult of his followers because we learned that it is ok to voice your opinion. I think muslims wouldn't be as upset about jokes/satire with their religion if they would sometimes laugh about it like they do with everything else here in germany. Islam shouldn't be a exception if muslims are making various jokes about religions and politicians aswell.
Yeah, sure.
It's not really new though. They (both her and her dad) have always been in favour of this.
Both suspects are apparently hiding in a flat in Crépy-en-Valois according to french TV station: France 3 Picardie
http://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/picardie/
Police is allready there.
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/charlie-hebdo-newsblog-zum-anschlag-von-paris-a-1011790.html
I am not following you at all? Could you elaborate?
Yes, it's more painful, so we agree on that. That also means that when we talk about satire, then what I personally would consider to be good satire would be satire that challenged or questioned those in power, whereas bad satire (to me) went out of its way to ridicule people who are already discriminated against and who are already exposed to a lot of ridicule and stigmatization and oppression in their daily lives. That does not at all mean that the latter doesn't deserve to exist - I am only saying it is possible to criticize it for being bad - i.e. my point is that freedom of speech does not entail freedom from criticism.
But it's a complex issue and the latter can be achieved successfully at times, but it's really tricky. I think this article about how comedy and rape jokes are a good way to understand the topic of "satire":
I do hope they capture them.
I think good satire challenges hypocrisies, flaws, abuses and so on in things that are normally seen as untouchable. Satirizing religions, including Islam, is entirely appropriate in that context. That it is a minority religion in Western countries doesn't seem necessarily relevant to me. Satirists had a field day with communist parties around a century ago for instance, and they certainly weren't in power in any of the countries where they were mocked.
Are you saying
Jokes about islams founder = nazi jokes?
Modern day Germany = Moderate Muslims ?
I do hope they capture them.
Satire doesn't attack only positions of power, but also bad habits of different communities. The only humour/satire police that exists is that it should still be within the limits of law. And if the satire is bad the magazine doesn't sell. A magazine is not some kind of public authority or NGO.
Heavy police presence in Crépy-en-Valois:
https://twitter.com/PolishSoldier1/status/553171514556973056
Heavy police presence in Crépy-en-Valois:
https://twitter.com/PolishSoldier1/status/553171514556973056
Of course they are oppressed. In Sweden there's hundreds of islamophobic crimes every year. Do you think a woman with a hijab has the same chance of getting a job as a white Christian in Europe?
And why I replied like that is because I think your statement really isn't even worth discussing, would be like saying black people aren't oppressed in US.
I do hope they capture them.
To be honest, I'm more hoping that no more innocent people or members of the French authorities are hurt.I bet these dumb fucks are gonna blow themselves up with their own rocket launcher.
One of them lost his shoe, they also knocked at the wrong address (twice) and they had to hijack a car. Also, they try to go train in Iraq and failed.
Those terrorists are semi-amateurs, what's new?
I agree with this.
When you make fun of a religion you make fun of the religion worldwide, not just of the minority in your country. You are making fun of the THING not specifically of the PEOPLE.
.AFP: #BREAKING Jihadist flags, Molotov cocktails found in car abandoned by Paris attackers: source
Kind of glad they turned out to be the typical semi-amateurs and not some terror squad out of a 24 story arc. First they went to the wrong address (archives), then they needed to force a mother to type in the pin code for them, using a scared 18 year old as driver etc.
Sure they might have had some training on rifles somewhere in the middle east, but they sure seem to be your typical failed kids in essence.
No father, growing up alone, no prospects for the future, easy prey for religious intoxination that pretends to give their lives meaning.
Satire doesn't attack only positions of power, but also bad habits of different communities.
The only humour/satire police that exists is that it should still be within the limits of law. And if the satire is bad the magazine doesn't sell. A magazine is not some kind of public authority or NGO.
Well said. And looking at Arab newspapers there are plenty of satirical depictions of Jews.Of course i can see where they come from but that doesn't mean that they're right.
And it is pretty similiar to us germans. In the 1950s-60s our nazi past was silenced to death, no one was allowed to talk about it let alone joke about it. Society didn't allowed it. But we learned (And i think that this kind of short coming in the islamic world) to laugh about ourselves and our past. We make jokes about catholic priests being pedophiles (even the pope), we make jokes about hitler and the cult of his followers because we learned that it is ok to voice your opinion. I think muslims wouldn't be as upset about jokes/satire with their religion if they would sometimes laugh about it like they do with everything else here in germany. Islam shouldn't be a exception if muslims are making various jokes about religions and politicians aswell.
Google has changed its front page again:
No, i used the german example to show that you have to learn to laugh about yourself which in my opinion the islamic world hasn't done yet.
Puma helicopter over Crépy-en-Valois where the suspects supposed to barricated them inside a appartment.
Was the satire specifically directed at Muslim Europeans or Islam in general? I was under the impression it was the latter. And Islam is definitely worthy of criticism (just like every other religion)This is not only a religion, but a culture as well. And this specific culture within European societies is discriminated against and oppressed. So when you contribute to the marginalisation of this particular group of people, don't you think that is worthy of criticism? Muslim Europeans, notably visible minorities, are culturally and racially discriminated against in European countries. This should be pretty evident, right?
Uderzo pays tribute:
Well, you better not make fun or Israel and the Jews then. Or are they fair game?Of course, but that's not at all what I am talking about. I am talking about satire that reproduces racist depictions of especially oppressed groups of people. That's what I would call bad satire. It's fine to exist, I'm just calling it bad. Satire isn't very good when you're punching down - that's just punching someone you've got pinned and laughing at them while you're doing it.
There has been so much police/special forces movement since this morning I have no idea what's going on. How do you guys even keep up with the news?
This is not only a religion, but a culture as well. And this specific culture within European societies is discriminated against and oppressed. So when you contribute to the marginalisation of this particular group of people, don't you think that is worthy of criticism? Muslim Europeans, notably visible minorities, are culturally and racially discriminated against in European countries. This should be pretty evident, right?
Thus, just like a White US citizen making a racial joke at the expense of Black US citizens is frowned up by virtue of the marginalised status of Black people in the US, so can jokes at the expense of Muslim culture (and the racial stereotypes that are so prevalent) be frowned upon.