No.Puddles said:Avatar got robbed for Best Picture.
Cameron got robbed for Best Director.
Basterds got robbed for Best Original Screenplay.
I thought Martin was fantastic, and Baldwin was not so great. They would have been better off having Martin go solo.Schattenjagger said:am I the only one that thought Martin and Baldwin were terrile as hosts ? Most of their jokes fell short - need to bring back jon Stewart
BertramCooper said:I thought Martin was fantastic, and Baldwin was not so great. They would have been better off having Martin go solo.
TheGreatDave said:Mo'nique's speech was pathetic, get the fuck over yourself. By all accounts she seems to have been great in that movie, but her speech was basically "I'm better than these people, thank God you gave it to me". Almost as bad as that make up chick that was like "Oh shit, this is my third, guess I'll have to find SOMEONE to dedicate this to!"
Zabka said:
Masaki_ said:i haven't seen the hurt locker but i'm certain whatever work bigelow put into it doesn't come close to cameron. this isn't the first time the academy rewarded mediocre filmmakers and movies, but still doesnt stop me from being pissed off somehow, even as it approaches complete irrelevancy. i guess that was what it would've made people see avatar from a more serious perspective. i would definitely like to see cameron another oscar before he's done.
Sobriquet said:And the Award for Best Cinematography goes to:
She had a good point, though. The Oscar for Costuming always goes to a period piece or sparkly musical.TheGreatDave said:Almost as bad as that make up chick that was like "Oh shit, this is my third, guess I'll have to find SOMEONE to dedicate this to!"
otake said:IB isn't even Quentins best work. I don't think it's a better movie than D9. I personally enjoy watching IB more, it's more entertaining. But that doesn't make it a better movie. I really do believe D9 should have won, Quentin should have won best original screenplay.
You sure about that?WyndhamPrice said:Just because it's digital doesn't make it any easier to frame or light or shoot.
Sobriquet said:And the Award for Best Cinematography goes to:
WyndhamPrice said:Just because it's digital doesn't make it any easier to frame or light or shoot.
Masaki_ said:i haven't seen the hurt locker but i'm certain whatever work bigelow put into it doesn't come close to cameron.
It's true. You need to match the lighting conditions of the on-set stuff to the CG set stuff, and blocking out virtual cameras isn't necessarily easier either, especially if you're trying to recreate "real" feeling camera movements, focus levels, etc. The only way that it's easier is not having to physically maneuver a rig around a set. If you play around with a virtual studio setup, it's not nearly as easy as people think.Sobriquet said:You sure about that?
WyndhamPrice said:Just because it's digital doesn't make it any easier to frame or light or shoot.
Sobriquet said:She had a good point, though. The Oscar for Costuming always goes to a period piece or sparkly musical.
If "amount of effort" was the primary criterion for awarding Oscars, Delgo would have gotten last year's Best Animated Feature Oscar. It's obvious that Cameron poured several years of his life into Avatar, but that doesn't mean he's more deserving than Bigelow for Best Director.Masaki_ said:i haven't seen the hurt locker but i'm certain whatever work bigelow put into it doesn't come close to cameron.
That's not really the hard part. The hard part is making the cameras feel like real ones, virtual cameras suffer from being too "perfect" in terms of focus levels, etc. A lot of Pixar's behind the scenes stuff that covers this subject are a good place to find some examples on the challenges with it.Jibril said:It's actually harder because it's digital, since you have to make the technology in the first place. And it looks better too.
XiaNaphryz said:That's not really the hard part. The hard part is making the cameras feel like real ones, virtual cameras suffer from being too "perfect" in terms of focus levels, etc. A lot of Pixar's behind the scenes stuff that covers this subject are a good place to find some examples on the challenges with it.
The Cinematographer didn't make the technology.Jibril said:It's actually harder because it's digital, since you have to make the technology in the first place. And it looks better too.
Where's the guy who predicted outrage in the media if Avatar lost? :lolgdt5016 said:Wow, at lot of people have no idea how Avatar was filmed in here (or how shooting digital/mo-cap stuff works), I think.
Anywho, ratings up a massive 20% this year. The Academy must be happy with their 10 nominees decision. They might do that again this year :/.
She's sure as hell better than Cameron's current squeeze.YYZ said:You guys need to calm down about me. Sure, I looked I good at the Oscars, but everyone does to some extent.
Puddles said:Avatar got robbed for Best Picture.
Cameron got robbed for Best Director.
Basterds got robbed for Best Original Screenplay.
BertramCooper said:She's sure as hell better than his current squeeze.
That woman is 48 YEARS OLD.
brianjones said:putting more work into something doesn't make something better.
BertramCooper said:If "amount of effort" was the primary criterion for awarding Oscars, Delgo would have gotten last year's Best Animated Feature Oscar. It's obvious that Cameron poured several years of his life into Avatar, but that doesn't mean he's more deserving than Bigelow for Best Director.
Avatar was an amazing technical achievement, but it is one of the most derivative films I have ever seen. While you can certainly applaud Cameron for his efforts in pushing new filmmaking technology, you can't just overlook his failure to create an original narrative.
SecretBonusPoint said:So out of all the short animated films in the world, I am to believe Logorama was due an Oscar was it? No.
Disappointed to see District 9 get absolutely nothing.
Jibril said:aye t'is true. It's have no idea why people hate anything and everything CG. None of the shit we see today would be possible without it. CG involves a lot of hard work, that deserves to be rewarded. I say this as a computing student who's had trouble making apps and games. :lol
Sorry, but it's just not true.XiaNaphryz said:It's true. You need to match the lighting conditions of the on-set stuff to the CG set stuff, and blocking out virtual cameras isn't necessarily easier either, especially if you're trying to recreate "real" feeling camera movements, focus levels, etc. The only way that it's easier is not having to physically maneuver a rig around a set. If you play around with a virtual studio setup, it's not nearly as easy as people think.
Whaaat? Since when has the film industry been on the brink of death? Total B.O. numbers have continued to increase, even in the midst of an economic downturn.Masaki_ said:true, but when that something you put so much effort into becomes a tremendous success, then, yeah, i think you deserve what awards you can get, especially when you also happen to postpone the death of a industry while you're at it
well, you've got me here.:lolCeres said:If only there was an award for that. We could call it something like Best Visual Effects