Edmond Dantès
Dantès the White
The other new images.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/the-hobbit-peter-jackson-warner-bros-1-billion-79301In late June, Horn and the key New Line executives paid a visit to New Zealand and watched a cut of the first film. Then Jackson and his collaborators pitched the idea of making not two but three Hobbit movies. Horn -- by then at Disney -- admits that the proposal came as a shock. The question, he says, was "Can each movie be a full meal?" The group agreed that Jackson's plan worked.
So now, almost miraculously, there will be three Hobbits instead of none -- which often seemed like the easier option. But the temptation of going back to the Tolkien well was too rich to resist. "At every junction, someone had to say, 'I know it's a problem, but let's go forward,' " says Horn. "Or, 'I know it's more expensive than we thought it would be, but it's worth it.' "
Of course, Horn acknowledges that it only will become clear whether the struggle was worth it when the movies come out. "The audience will decide," he says. "But I've seen the first movie -- and it's a joy to be back in that world."
It's hard to stay away from this thread. Cannot wait for this movie to come out!
...and now for some shameless self-promotion, I hope this is ok with you guys. I made the semifinals on The Hobbit Treasures of Middle-Earth art contest, and just wanted you guys to check out my entry and possibly rate it.
My Great Goblin interpretation
Thanks!
In Peter we trust.
Congrats on making it to the semis. Hope you go further. Voted for you.It's hard to stay away from this thread. Cannot wait for this movie to come out!
...and now for some shameless self-promotion, I hope this is ok with you guys. I made the semifinals on The Hobbit Treasures of Middle-Earth art contest, and just wanted you guys to check out my entry and possibly rate it.
My Great Goblin interpretation
Thanks!
I feel like I remember hearing either Peter or Phillipa say they made that decision after watching the rough clips that they had more than they could fit in two that they really wanted the third film.Edmond Dantès;43307507 said:'The Hobbit:' Inside Peter Jackson and Warner Bros' $1 Billion Gamble
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/the-hobbit-peter-jackson-warner-bros-1-billion-79301
So, it was Peter's idea.
Edmond Dantès;43307507 said:'The Hobbit:' Inside Peter Jackson and Warner Bros' $1 Billion Gamble
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/the-hobbit-peter-jackson-warner-bros-1-billion-79301
So, it was Peter's idea.
It's hard to stay away from this thread. Cannot wait for this movie to come out!
...and now for some shameless self-promotion, I hope this is ok with you guys. I made the semifinals on The Hobbit Treasures of Middle-Earth art contest, and just wanted you guys to check out my entry and possibly rate it.
My Great Goblin interpretation
Thanks!
That's the chap. Finished it earlier and I'm inclined to agree, it's nice to really start connecting some of the dots in the lore.Akallabêth? One of my favorite parts It's relatively brief compared to the other sections of the Silmarillion, but no less epic.
Ian McKellen: 'I almost didn't sign up for The Hobbit'
The British actor will return as Gandalf the Wizard in Peter Jackson's prequel to the Lord of the Rings series, but McKellen admitted that the amount of time he needed to be away from home was a daunting prospect.
"It was a little like going back to something that wasn't necessarily going to be particularly challenging," the 73-year-old told The Hollywood Reporter.
"Gandalf is still inside me, as it were, so the business of getting to know a new character - I was sort of going to be robbed of that."
However, McKellen explained that he did not want to let the fans down by having somebody else play the role he made his own.
"You felt, how many millions of people are waiting for it?" he said. "They wouldn't understand if you weren't as keen as they were."
McKellen added that he finds more satisfaction in playing the younger Gandalf the Grey instead of Gandalf the White, as he is a more playful character.
"Peter Jackson and I much prefer Gandalf the Grey, who was a man who did manage to enjoy himself," he said.
It's hard to stay away from this thread. Cannot wait for this movie to come out!
...and now for some shameless self-promotion, I hope this is ok with you guys. I made the semifinals on The Hobbit Treasures of Middle-Earth art contest, and just wanted you guys to check out my entry and possibly rate it.
My Great Goblin interpretation
Thanks!
Edmond Dantès;43276468 said:It also gives an indication that Sauron was not above pleasures of the flesh, especially considering the form he took during that period.
This is a pretty good indication of what he may have looked like:
But...but...GAF told me it was the WB/New Line execs forcing PJ to crap out a third movie to make an extra buck off of the additional footage that was shot???
The following pretty much inspired Tolkien's Dark Lords.I was just watching the Ralph Bakshi LOTR and that Eowyn vs Witch King scene is something else. I like Eoywn's lines in the old english but the Witch King voice is just bizzare. I think he also did an adaptation of the Hobbit but I am not sure, I have not seen it.
Too much information, I always knew Jude Law was evil.
On a more serious note this is something you see in other stories as well. I am not sure how common it is but I am always fascinated by the idea when I see it in mythology and modern day stories, the idea of the villain or "devil" of the story being beautiful either now or at one point in the past. We also saw it in Harry Potter where Voldemort started out as extremely handsome but turned all creepy looking by the end.
Thus far these beyond
Compare of mortal prowess, yet observed
Their dread Commander. He, above the rest
In shape and gesture proudly eminent
Stood like a tower. His form had yet not lost
All her original brightness, nor appeared
Less than Archangel ruined, and th' excess
Of glory obscured: as when the sun new-risen
Looks through the horizontal misty air
Shorn of his beams, or, from behind the moon
In dim eclipse, disastrous twilight sheds
On half the nations, and with fear of change
Perplexes monarchs. Darkened so, yet shone
Above them all th' Archangel: but his face
Deep scars of thunder had intrenched, and care
Sat on his faded cheek, but under brows
Of dauntless courage, and considerate pride
Waiting revenge. Cruel his eye, but cast
Signs of remorse and passion, to behold
The fellows of his crime, the followers rather
(Far other once beheld in bliss), condemned
For ever now to have their lot in pain--
Millions of Spirits for his fault amerced
Of Heaven, and from eternal splendours flung
For his revolt--yet faithful how they stood
Their glory withered; as, when heaven's fire
Hath scathed the forest oaks or mountain pines
With singed top their stately growth, though bare
Stands on the blasted heath.
Edmond Dantès;43320534 said:A few new images:
Two months hence and we still don't know the Hi Speed/IMAX/3D locations? Ludicrous.
Two months hence and we still don't know the Hi Speed/IMAX/3D locations? Ludicrous.
This has been one of the most disappointing aspect of this for me. Has almost deflated all of my excitement. I wonder what Peter is thinking
It would be WB, not Peter.
Oh I know... but I wonder how Peter feels about this. Like if the footage turned out awesome, in his opinion, is he cursing from the mountain tops at WB for fucking it up? Or does he concede that 48fps isn't ready. I just would like someone to interview him about it and what he thinks the future of 48fps is.
Oh I know... but I wonder how Peter feels about this. Like if the footage turned out awesome, in his opinion, is he cursing from the mountain tops at WB for fucking it up? Or does he concede that 48fps isn't ready. I just would like someone to interview him about it and what he thinks the future of 48fps is.
One can imagine he's probably not too thrilled about it, seeing he's been one of the biggest proponents of 48p over the last couple of years. You can see it in the man's eyes in the production videos; he's completely psyched about it. The WB reaction seemed to stem out of a combination of the (specifically negative) Cinemacon reactions and their own internal surveys done about interest in 48p from audiences. To my knowledge, no 100% completed footage from The Hobbit running at 48p has been seen by anyone outside of the production at this point, which is sad
I swear focus group and test screenings have been the death of Hollywood. Who are these hooligans they are using in these groups and do directors appreciate this process or concede that they improve their art?
He consented to making some minor changes regarding the use of the word "man" and agreed the wizard Gandalf's use of the word "boys" as an insult "was rather silly and not quite up to form".
Truly. Thats why Tolkien wanted The Silmarillion published alongside The Lord of the Rings.I have to say I'm REALLY pleased I persevered through to the later stages of The Silmarillion. It adds so much to the understanding of the events of The Hobbit and The Lord Of The Rings.
Edmond Dantès;43333220 said:Tolkien letter reveals poor sales of The Hobbit
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19965058
He'd be quite pleased with the fact that The Hobbit is now the third best selling book of all time.
Also:
A revised edition, a revised edition, my kingdom for a revised edition!
I have to say I'm REALLY pleased I persevered through to the later stages of The Silmarillion. It adds so much to the understanding of the events of The Hobbit and The Lord Of The Rings.
Wait, I'm lost. You're "pissed"? So you're mad that the Sil added to LOTR? Or you're drunk because of this...or what?
Thats absolutely correct, then came the great unexpected boom of the seventies which saw Tolkiens popularity increase to unprecedented levels. Not till the film trilogys release was there another such rise in Tolkien appreciation.Yeah, I was reading something like that a few days ago. I believe the Middle Earth books didn't really pull a profit until the early 60s? Maybe the late 50s when LOTR was released in Britain, but I'm fairly certain my former point was correct.
I was going to ask a question about the swords but I looked the information and got more confused.
spoilers to be safeI was going to ask if we had seen 'biter' and 'beater' yet. I looked and I totally spaced the Orcist IS biter. I guess it's been a long time. So, Thorin does not start with Orcrist but finds it...ok Have we seen Beater
Beater is Glamdring and Gandulf used it through out the LoTR trilogy
Edmond Dantès;43348139 said:That‘s absolutely correct, then came the great unexpected boom of the seventies which saw Tolkien‘s popularity increase to unprecedented levels. Not till the film trilogy‘s release was there another such rise in Tolkien appreciation.
The Hobbit trilogy may well be the next. A whole new generation to fall in love with Middle-earth. Brings a smile to my face.
He said "pleased," not pissed
http://comicbook.com/blog/2012/10/18/the-hobbit-details-on-evangeline-lilys-tauriel/First, Evangeline Lilys character is the Captain of the Mirkwood Guard and she uses twin daggers.
They stress that she is a fierce fighter but has a strong sense of right and wrong and will fight for what she believes is right.
Also, her hair is going to be dyed red for the part (or a reddish brown).
Edmond Dantès;43279720 said:The other new images.
Edmond Dantès;43343901 said:
I remember last year he had Elijah Wood on his show, and he mentioned off-hand that he had been to the set and thought it looked amazing, but I think this is the first reference to his visit that I've seen outside of that one mention.