Getting a bunch of 10s doesn't mean anything. Uncharted 2 got great scores without being a good game. All you need is the right balance of exclusivity and pre-release hype, while attempting to be "deep" with a tacked on story that doesn't suit your gameplay. Bioshock did it just a few months ago. If you have the right budget it's pretty easy to get the press to cum all over your games.
I don't get it. Does he think naughty dog is Japanese? Warui dogs
Not really. It's disappointing sure but the other elements of the game should still hold it above a fucking "average" score. That review is pure click bait.
Self-fulfilling prophecy.
Should I do a new wall or would that be too "antagonistic and petty" ?
Well fuck them to in that case.
Always knew they were Microsoft loyalists. No surprise there.
Now I can't care any less about review scores BUT with that 7.5 amidst the higher scores, is there an ulterior motives here? I see people claiming being sponsored by MS/Xbox so is there reason to call bullshit? I mean, can't Naughty Dog investigate, are there laws being broke or is this standard practice?
Like I said, I don't care. I'm all over it. But the claims here make me think something more "dirty" is at play.
To be fair most people here won't even read reviews because of spoilers.just another day arguing over arbitrary numbers on the internet
Well fuck them to in that case.
Always knew they were Microsoft loyalists. No surprise there.
just another day arguing over arbitrary numbers on the internet
Getting a bunch of 10s doesn't mean anything. Uncharted 2 got great scores without being a good game.
Because reviews are coming in really fast?Why is the first post not showing the non-perfect scores?
Wow at those scores in the OP. This generations Half Life 2?
Now I can't care any less about review scores BUT with that 7.5 amidst the higher scores, is there an ulterior motives here? I see people claiming being sponsored by MS/Xbox so is there reason to call bullshit? I mean, can't Naughty Dog investigate, are there laws being broke or is this standard practice?
Like I said, I don't care. I'm all over it. But the claims here make me think something more "dirty" is at play.
I didn't play SS but I would give Infamous 2 the same score.Is it just me or is Tom McShea a massive click baiter? Skyward Sword 7.5, inFamous 2 7.5 are some of his other reviews that come to mind
lol
Please tell me that you are joking...
Oh wow, Polygon.
And to compare, they gave Remember Me 8.
just another day arguing over arbitrary numbers on the internet
And for now, my prediction has been vindicated.96 on Metacritic.
![]()
What is an "Emargo"?
96 on Metacritic.
![]()
If you do one, be sure to make sure you're not getting people that are being sarcastic. That's the problem with quoting out of context.
Sounds like you do care lolNow I can't care any less about review scores BUT with that 7.5 amidst the higher scores, is there an ulterior motives here? I see people claiming being sponsored by MS/Xbox so is there reason to call bullshit? I mean, can't Naughty Dog investigate, are there laws being broke or is this standard practice?
Like I said, I don't care. I'm all over it. But the claims here make me think something more "dirty" is at play.
I think I'm gonna die from the shock of that surprise!
Why would Microsoft give money to a single site so they would score the game 'above average' instead of 'near-perfect'? Stop it, guys. Conspiracy theories are ridiculous and incredibly ignorant. Phil Kollar didn't like the game as much as some other people did. Fine. That's entirely possible. You disagree? That's reasonable, too.Now I can't care any less about review scores BUT with that 7.5 amidst the higher scores, is there an ulterior motives here? I see people claiming being sponsored by MS/Xbox so is there reason to call bullshit? I mean, can't Naughty Dog investigate, are there laws being broke or is this standard practice?
Like I said, I don't care. I'm all over it. But the claims here make me think something more "dirty" is at play.
Since my review will be posted in a non-gaming magazine later this month, I though I'd post some breif opinions of my own here.
1. This really feels like this generation's Resident Evil 4.
2. Possibly the best intro in any game I've ever played.
3. The E3 demo was a fairly accurate representation of how the game plays.
4. If you turn off listening mode from the start, the game hardly even mentions it exists. Never felt like I needed it; just turn the volume up and you'll be fine.
5. This is a long game. Took mehours to beat.13
6. Story is good, pacing is great and voice-acting is amazing.
This is coming from someone who adored Uncharted 2, but was dissapointed in Uncharted 3.
I am surprised Giant Bomb gave it 5/5
I thought those guys were pro MS
I am surprised Giant Bomb gave it 5/5
I thought those guys were pro MS