*takes a look at the OP*
What. Don't think I've ever seen this many 10's before. What the fuck. Okay, I'm hyped now.
You must have missed GTA IV. It had probably 4x that. It's looked back on now with scorn for a reason.
*takes a look at the OP*
What. Don't think I've ever seen this many 10's before. What the fuck. Okay, I'm hyped now.
Good thing is that sites which wrote a negative preview like videogamer and cvg , changed their opinion after playing the final game
He gave Ni No Kuni a 6.5...what the fudge. This guy should stop reviewing games. Only being half sarcastic.
moozo said:The typo in the thread title is making me inordinately angry
http://www.pushsquare.com/reviews/ps3/last_of_usIt took us just under 15 hours to finish our first journey on the standard difficulty, and in that time we still somehow missed almost a third of the hidden collectibles. Throughout the game youll be gathering artifacts that tell the tales of other survivors, as well as comic books and dog tags. There are also survival manuals that enhance some of your abilities, as well as tool boxes and cogs. The latter can be exchanged at workbenches in return for weapon upgrades, while youll also happen upon medication which can be spent on improving Joels abilities. Its unlikely that youll max out the protagonists attributes during your first playthrough, but fortunately theres a New Game Plus option that allows you to expand the experience with all of your gear intact. Finally, you can purchase new costume skins, graphical filters, and concept art as you complete certain in-game tasks.
Didn't Microsoft only fund the documentary and not their day to day operation or the creation of their site? Last time I checked the facts, this was the case.
We can't expect a good score for a PS3 exclusive on Polygon.
The Last of Us - 7,5 (Metascore: 95)
God of War: Ascension - 7,0 (Metascore: 80)
Ni No Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch - 6,5 (Metascore: 85) * the same guy, by the way
That site IS A JOKE.
so how spoilery is the GT review? I'm avoiding it by default just in case..
No one is allowed to talk about the beginning or anything after the halfway point. We can more or less only talk about the stuff you have seen in the trailers and nothing else. We can't even discuss some of the easter eggs and main character motivations.
They even gave Journey a 10 (Metascore: 92)
THEY NEVER GET IT RIGHT ITS A CONSPIRACY
Didn't Microsoft only fund the documentary and not their day to day operation or the creation of their site? Last time I checked the facts, this was the case.
It's just their opinion. People should just be up in arms because Polygon reviews are fucking miserably written.
Yeah, very positive sign.
I want to read an opinion from one of my trusted neoGAFers, with the following things in mind:
¶ I want to see someone who didn't like Uncharted 3 and thought Uncharted 2 was pretty emblematic of the problem with AAA game design share their opinion on THE LAST OF US.
¶ I want to see someone who loved the Uncharted titles but didn't get into THE LAST OF US share their viewpoints. That would be fascinating to me too.
¶ I want to see someone who hates Quantic Dreams storytelling (and most games storytelling) describe their reaction to the narrative of THE LAST OF US. This would be very informative and telling to me.
Yep lots of stuff to fine collect and unlock I see.AND it's fucking meaty?
Oh man, I cannot believe how fast my anticipation for LAST of US have turned around. Hope I'm not burning myself by allowing myself to get real excited now lol
I'll bet if you tried you could find 3 PS3 exclusives they scored above the mean as well.
A 7 for GOW Ascension is entirely reasonable and I say this as a big fan of the series.
Surprised gamestop only have it at an 8. thought mc shea will like this time of game.
Is it true that Microsoft funded Polygon when it was starting up?
I want this game Day 1, been looking forward to it for quite along time...but i dont want to spend $60i havent seen any deals either
Lol. Amazing analogy.I thoroughly enjoyed The Last of Us after the first few hours. It goes from regular season Roy Hibbert to playoff Roy Hibbert. Thankfully, it avoid Game 7 Roy Hibbert.
I want to read an opinion from one of my trusted neoGAFers, with the following things in mind:
¶ I want to see someone who didn't like Uncharted 3 and thought Uncharted 2 was pretty emblematic of the problem with AAA game design share their opinion on THE LAST OF US.
¶ I want to see someone who loved the Uncharted titles but didn't get into THE LAST OF US share their viewpoints. That would be fascinating to me too.
¶ I want to see someone who hates Quantic Dreams storytelling (and most games storytelling) describe their reaction to the narrative of THE LAST OF US. This would be very informative and telling to me.
Is it true that Microsoft funded Polygon when it was starting up?
AND it's fucking meaty?
Oh man, I cannot believe how fast my anticipation for LAST of US have turned around. Hope I'm not burning myself by allowing myself to get real excited now lol
Is it true that Microsoft funded Polygon when it was starting up?
Oh this Polygon situation is starting to get interesting:
![]()
For those who don't know, Jeff Rubenstein is the former Social Media Manager for Sony and basically ran the PlayStation Blog. Here's the full Twitter conversation for those interested: https://twitter.com/jeffrubenstein/status/342394130497949696
First, "GAF" is not a hivemind, and you should probably learn that because mods ban for that shit. Just a heads up, not trying to be mean I don't want to see you gone just because you're being a little naive. Also, nobody hates games that review well - nobody is in kindergarten or thinks it's hip to "go against the crowd." Virtually all us like this simply don't care about reviews one way or another and form their OWN individual opinions, which often are at odds with the reviews because game journalists are a joke.
So Darknessbear, do you really need to do this AGAIN? Just ignore the posts that offend your delicate sensibilities, and quote and respond to posts which frolic without negativity and have rainbows and pretty butterflies hovering over their posts ;P
The way I see it:
10- a masterpiece
9- amazing
8- great
7- good
6-average
5 and below- bad
and last of us 7.5 with metacritic at 9.5
so 1 of 5 times being out of touch with the quality of games in playstation3 isn't a great average. i don't think they are idiots. i think they know exactly what they are doing.they don't even bother hiding it.......
they are filled with ads anyone can see. open VoxMedias information about advertisers,Microsoft is among their biggest. get real
and last of us 7.5 with metacritic at 9.5
so 1 of 5 times being out of touch with the quality of games in playstation3 isn't a great average. i don't think they are idiots. i think they know exactly what they are doing.they don't even bother hiding it.......l
This is why I really wanted Gamespots Kevin Van Ord to review this game, he is one of the few people who's opinion is worth a damn.
SP unlockables were sorely missed in UC3. So glad they're back in TLoU.
Did you? He criticizes it for being ultra violent and keeps going back to it, almost as if he wants it to be another game or something.
Lol, they want to remain relevant.![]()
EVEN THEIR TWEETS ONLY RESULT IN 7 TOTAL CHARACTERS
WHAT THE FUCK
But let's take your claim seriously. We we have the data available necessary to take every one of Polygon's review scores for a PS3 game and compare it to the metacritic average and calculate an index of bias. Until someone does this, everyone should stop whining about Polygon and proceed to whine about something else.