Korra gets put on the internet to make way for spongebob reruns because that franchise is 15 years old and still pulls 50 million opening weekend.
"Kuvira save me from my mom!"
"That bitch has issues...always sneaking into my bed."
"Wait what?"
"Nothing, don't put too much emotional stock in this relationship. If you're dumb enough to get captured you better act like you don't know me."
IIRC the argument is apparently if you can negate something that happened to you then you could negate anything else since they also exist with you (such as duration and scope as you listed).
And if its strictly assigned to you somehow why not also negate those "limits" since they are also happening to you (i am using this technique, let me use it longer, or in danzo's case if 9 eyes are gone, use the 10th to get back the other 9 since its negating what's happening to him i.e he lost 9 eyes).
The only "limit" imo was the "you lose your sight after casting the technique" but it doesn't stop having multiple eyes or getting your eyes healed due to getting Rinnegan (where you lose the technique but gain greater abilities) so...*shrug*
Do we have evidence of it actually re-writing reality, as 'oh suddenly I remember that my killing blow didin't connect and he's still up because he has this technique' or does it seem more along the lines of ripping a hole in space time and the guy say 'nah'.
PS: Narruto is stupid.
but it isn't based off nothing though since you can rewrite the fabric of reality, you are just placing generic "rules" on a technique that's really limitless and that's just the writer failing to rein in his own technique.
Its funny that the sister technigue is just as broken but its limits were clearly mentioned and you had an exit clause of sorts
Madara apparently came back to life after he legit died by (willingly) scheduling a post mortem activation of the technique then he hid his tracks lol
Also i don't think there was any direct reference that what was discussed was actually attempted and said to not have worked (which as you said would have placed some sort of hard coded limit and shutdown a section of Veelk's argument lol) but is instead assumed since the character who used it the most didn't do any of that (when he could have just not attempted it at all).
It's based of a vague explanation of the technique. In the show/manga, it was explained that you can make an event that happens to you merely a dream, thus creating a new reality for yourself, but just because they didn't explicitly state limits, doesn't mean there aren't any. It's makes much more sense to draw assumptions on the limits of the techniques based on feats rather than just assuming they could do more with it than they did. All the times it was used, it was only to negate a certain death they would have had in that recent moment. So we can assume based on that, that there are relatively strict limits on what they (Obito, Madara, and Danzo) had the ability to do with the technique based off of how it was actually put into practice.
Well, all I can say is that I really wish you were Kishimoto's editor so all of this could be stuff that actually happened instead of grasping at straws to make sense out of what is plainly bad writing.
I love that she hails Kuvira as much as I do.
There are a lot of obvious stupid things about Naruto, but I personally don't think it's completely fair to try to put on your own rules about what could have been done with the technique and knock it for that when the limits here were heavily implied, in my opinion.
Though, the fact that we're having this conversation proves that it could have been handled better.
No, the problem is that you don't seem to understand what 'rewrite reality' means. I'm not putting my own interpretation on anything, I'm pointing out the inherent contradiction of being having limits on a power defined by removing limitations.
Though if a character had tried it and failed...well, I would have also questioned why it failed, but atleast then it'd have actually established that the limits are immutable.
I sail Kuvira too. Oh you said hail.... that too
Same here. I ship, hail and swab every deck of every ship.I sail Kuvira too. Oh you said hail.... that too
Speaking of sails, I'm pretty sure she's actually the only person in the world that keeps with that KuviraxBataar Jr. ship. Because I doubt even Bryke did.
I understand completely what rewriting reality means, and that's precisely what the technique does. It rewrites reality. That's not saying there are no limits to what you can rewrite. Again, they said it makes a certain event that happens to you merely a dream. All of the times it was used, it was to change something that happened right before it's activation.
You can't rewrite the laws of how the technique works. You can't just wish you had unlimited sharingan, because you can only negate something that already happened to you within (as it's been shown) a fairly brief time frame. That's it. You can only make it so something that happened to you very recently, didn't happen, and you get another chance at it. If you trip on a rock and fall, you can negate it so you didn't trip on a rock and fall. What all are you saying you could possibly do with this technique?
As I just said, if you think there can be limits, you don't understand what it means to rewrite reality. I've already explained how that power, by it's very definition, cannot be limited by anything in my earlier posts, so you can reread those because explaining it would just be redundant.
Or, to put it another way, imagine you are a character in a novel. Now imagine that just for 5 minutes, you can become the author of that novel you are in. Think about what that even means. Why the hell would the perception of time in a novel apply to time outside of the novel. If there is no writing/reading being done, the universe effectively freezes at the page you are on. How can the progression of time in the novel possibly apply to you outside off the novel? It makes no sense. Similarly, there is no such thing as 'recent' when you exist outside time. Everything to what happened 2 seconds ago all the way back to the Big Bang are of equal distance.
If you can rewrite reality, you are God. Omnipotent. If you aren't, then you are working within reality and you can't rewrite it from there.
Speaking of sails, I'm pretty sure she's actually the only person in the world that keeps with that KuviraxBataar Jr. ship. Because I doubt even Bryke did.
I just think you don't quite get the fundamentals of the technique. I will keep repeating this, because it's crucial.
The technique allows you to take a recent event that happened to you, and make it so it didn't happen. In doing that, and only that, you are essentially rewriting reality. It was never said that you could rewrite anything. It's just that, because of the fact that the technique allows the user to negate something that already happened to them, and make it so it didn't happen, that would be basically rewriting reality. You see? You can rewrite reality, but only under the circumstances of taking something that happened to you recently, and making it so it didn't happen.
So if you fall off of a cliff, you can change it so you didn't fall off of a cliff. No where in those rules allows you to imagine that a bridge exists between the gap. You literally can't do anything else but make it so something that happened to you, didn't happen. By those rules, it's impossible to just change whatever you want to change.
The amount of dumb stuff in Naruto is staggering. You got eye illusions and dimensional teleportation. You can summon shit from any distance and anywhere by putting some blood on a scroll. People can make clones of themselves at will. One dude controlled gravity or something. You seal up literal forces of nature inside people and wonder why they grow up lonely and/or sociopathic.
Izanagi is on the more tame side of Naruto buffoonery if you ask me, lol. Shonen doesn't try very hard to make sense.
sounds like a plan
Hehehehehe
Though if a character had tried it and failed...well, I would have also questioned why it failed, but atleast then it'd have actually established that the limits are immutable.
The amount of dumb stuff in Naruto is staggering. You got eye illusions and dimensional teleportation. You can summon shit from any distance and anywhere by putting some blood on a scroll. People can make clones of themselves at will. One dude controlled gravity or something. You seal up literal forces of nature inside people and wonder why they grow up lonely and/or sociopathic.
Izanagi is on the more tame side of Naruto buffoonery if you ask me, lol. Shonen doesn't try very hard to make sense.
That took me much longer to figure out than it should've.Then you have that one nocturnal bird...
Like the Titanic, amirite?She still believes that her ship will resurface from the bottom of the ocean.
Don't get me wrong, the dumb stuff is what gave Naruto its charm. But you have to take it all with a grain of salt cuz otherwise you're spending time trying to rationalize stuff that never had any intention of being rational.
And there it is.
It was a technique that wasn't clearly defined to the point that assumptions had to be made on whether its limited or limitless due to its nature.
And there it is.
It was a technique that wasn't clearly defined to the point that assumptions had to be made on whether its limited or limitless due to its nature.
Bring on the ships!
Even Kuvira didn't ship that ship. She said Korra's name in the show way more than Bataar's.She still believes that her ship will resurface from the bottom of the ocean.
No, the problem is that you don't seem to understand what 'rewrite reality' means. I'm not putting my own interpretation on anything, I'm pointing out the inherent contradiction of being having limits on a power defined by removing limitations.
Though if a character had tried it and failed...well, I would have also questioned why it failed, but atleast then it'd have actually established that the limits are immutable.
The only limit not explicitly defined is just how far you can go back, but going off of how it was used, we can only logically assume that you can't go back very far.
I don't feel like my point has been directly addressed, or fully understood.
The stated, and clearly defined rules of the jutsu are
-You can make something that happened to you, merely a dream, so that it essentially didn't happen.
That means you can't just imagine anything you want to imagine and make it reality. You can only make it so something that happened directly to you, didn't happen. Tell me, how could you possibly go rewriting everything in history, or rewriting the laws so you can become a god, with those clearly stated limitations?
Because if it can effect you and your existence it could effect anyone/anything else or their existence since you are all part of that reality, unless there is some clear reason why it wouldn't/couldn't work (losing your eyesight permanently was a psudo-reason was until "lol overuled").
And its not like a vortex or some time flip or some strict genjustu where it seems you were affected by something but actually wasn't, you literally can undo your fate (if used well).
Because if it can effect you and your existence it could effect anyone/anything else or their existence since you are all part of that reality, unless there is some clear reason why it wouldn't/couldn't work (losing your eyesight permanently was a psudo-reason was until "lol overuled").
And its not like a vortex or some time flip or some strict genjustu where it seems you were affected by something but actually wasn't, you literally can undo your fate (if used well).
I think its the use of the word "reality" that's throwing people off
It doesn't effect anyone else's existence but your own. The times it has been shown, it literally affects the only the user himself, not anyone else around him, It's also been clearly stated that the genjustsu can only be casted on yourself. It effects nothing else but your state of existence. You can't use it to directly effect other people or other things.
But nothing is seemingly stopping it from happening due to its inherent nature and assumptions due to some dude not doing it.
If it was just enforced well (hell let madara say he tried it but it didn't work somehow) and i don't think such questions would appear (though Veelk will more likely question those).
Huh. I don't get what you're saying here.
But nothing is seemingly stopping it from happening due to its inherent nature and assumptions due to some dude not doing it.
If it was just enforced well (hell let madara say he tried it but it didn't work somehow) and i don't think such questions would appear (though Veelk will more likely question those).
Also it would remove the idiot ball defense of the user but that's just me not being a fan of those shonen tropes
Yeah, but if that were the case, atleast the story would acknowledge that there is a massive contradiction in the logic of what it is capable of doing. I wouldn't even necessarily need to know the answer of what is preventing it, but I could then atleast assume there is some outside force that's stopping it rather than just a clear and massive oversight on part of the author.
It's far more likely that the ability was never seen cast on another because you can't than it is no one thought to do try when developing this ability.
There is no contradiction.
The rules say you can only take something that happened to you and make it so it didn't happen. It doesn't directly effect anyone else in anyway, or anything else but the user's state. Those are the rules. No contradictions. You can't become a god within those rules.
You keep throwing around the term "circular logic" instead of just directly addressing my point.
There is no contradiction whatsoever with the rules, and how it was (and wasn't) used in the show.
Go on. Tell me how you can rewrite reality to become a god when the rules clearly state that you can only take an event that happened to you (like a fatal wound), and make it so it didn't happen. The genjutsu is casted on yourself. It doesn't change the state of anyone, or anything else.
I coulda sworn they agreed to disagree.
The entire reasoning for which to counter this has already been explained in my previous posts, and Infinite Justice is also understanding why if you can affect one part of reality, there is no reason you shouldn't affect any part and the entirety of reality, because it is all one thing. A particular individuals existence does not exist in a separate reality from the rest of the world. I don't want to get into this again, because I have already explained why what you say does not apply and you're just not getting it.
Similarly, your argument for why users couldn't do that is because they didn't. And your saying they didn't because they couldn't. As infinite justice pointed out, if they tried, but they couldn't, that'd be a whole different argument, since then we'd know there is something external preventing the possibility of reality manipulation taking place. But we don't get that, we just get people not doing it for no reason, which you assume must mean they couldn't and they couldn't because they didn't.
http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/i...ular-reasoning
Here, read up on that to understand why your argument is very bad and not admissible.