tmlDan
Member
prob trying to get their artistic vision to work on an old piece of hardwareAnyone remember the ‘what have they been doing for 6 years!?’
I can't imagine how difficult that is lol
prob trying to get their artistic vision to work on an old piece of hardwareAnyone remember the ‘what have they been doing for 6 years!?’
For a mobile APU that’s 6 years old, running this open world with all these systems at a stable 30FPS is perfectly fine. And trust me, I always want >60FPS, I spent $1200 on an RTX4080, but I’m finding the solid 30 totally acceptable. Much more acceptable than the jankiness of emulators with a 60FPS mod.30fps is LOW, thats why. Anything under 60fps in 2023 is trash with the tech we have today. How they can give a game perfect score when it's technically underperforming just goes to show how biased reviewers are. They should deduct atleat 1 point from the performance alone.
I really cant tell if people are serious or are trolling anymore...30fps is LOW, thats why. Anything under 60fps in 2023 is trash with the tech we have today. How they can give a game perfect score when it's technically underperforming just goes to show how biased reviewers are. They should deduct atleat 1 point from the performance alone.
Skyward Sword had really innovative controls, some of the best dungeons in the franchise and a great story. There's no quite game like it and people try to make it seem like "eh that game was meh" when it's so far from the truth.Bruh this is like the pinnacle of Zelda. Maybe Skyward Sword deserves mediocre scores, but it ain’t this game. It’s as 10/10 as gaming gets.
The controls were a pain in the ass, and the sword lady wouldn’t shut up for five minutes to let you figure stuff out, but you’re right about the dungeons and a mid Zelda game still being good.Skyward Sword had really innovative controls, some of the best dungeons in the franchise and a great story. There's no quite game like it and people try to make it seem like "eh that game was meh" when it's so far from the truth.
A "bad" Zelda game is still better than most games out there.
The salt started flowing early.Like typical Nintendo IP
If it would release in similar technical shape on xbox/playstation = 50-60%
on nintendo system = 90-100%
I bet it is fun adventure, but Nintendo and fair reviews dont go together, they always get away with big technical issues and other things, that would make the game get much lower scores on other ecosystems. Like mario odyssey, game is like 7/10 max but if someone says it out loud, nintendo-ninjas come at night
Fifty? You got an alpha copy or something?In a 50 hours game.
Ah yes, the game where your fantastic powers are used to move around boxes and shiny balls for 80 hours.Without the "Zelda tax", it should review slightly better than Immortals Fenyx Rising
Buy a smaller TV, problem solved.Looks amazing. I just cant imagine how shit this will look on a 65" OLED. Hurry up and release some up to date hardware dammit!!!
They already tried.Xbox needs to buy Nintendo!
lmfao.. theyre just mad that no matter how many games Sony makes they still cant touch Nintendos XDThe salt started flowing early.
Fifty? You got an alpha copy or something?
Ah yes, the game where your fantastic powers are used to move around boxes and shiny balls for 80 hours.
Buy a smaller TV, problem solved.
They already tried.
Awful overworld, unbearable handholding for the first 5 hours, Fi treating you like a mentally challenged child, item prompts reintroduction after you load up every save (Wii version), unnecessarily cumbersome controls and relentless backtracking that grind the pace to a halt make it easily the worst 3D Zelda. Couple of nice dungeons, Groose and some superb boss battles cant make up for the rest. Its a 7/10 and would be forgotten if it didint have Zelda on the title.Skyward Sword had really innovative controls, some of the best dungeons in the franchise and a great story. There's no quite game like it and people try to make it seem like "eh that game was meh" when it's so far from the truth.
A "bad" Zelda game is still better than most games out there.
"These tears are salty"
what a troll.same reviewer who gave TOTK a 6/10 btw lmaooooo
Of course, there's always the sonyfan troll review
same reviewer who gave TOTK a 6/10 btw lmaooooo
60fps was always and will always be possible. If it is a goal in the design process of a game, everything else can be build around that. But more effects and shiny graphics can be marketed more easily.30fps is LOW, thats why. Anything under 60fps in 2023 is trash with the tech we have today. How they can give a game perfect score when it's technically underperforming just goes to show how biased reviewers are. They should deduct atleat 1 point from the performance alone.
Aiming for 60fps would require them to cut back on everything else that makes the game good. The game runs perfectly smooth at 30fps, as noted by the scores.30fps is LOW, thats why. Anything under 60fps in 2023 is trash with the tech we have today. How they can give a game perfect score when it's technically underperforming just goes to show how biased reviewers are. They should deduct atleat 1 point from the performance alone.
how come it doesn't interest you mate?It's rare that a game comes out with a metacritic score of 96 and I still retain zero interest in it.
Dawg, we all know it's 'bout dat framez pur secint, and dur rezlution, not gameplay and design. * oink laugh*Pffftt who cares about good games.
It's all about the services.
Just took HLTB average.Fifty? You got an alpha copy or something?
This is like someone giving a 2D Mario game a 6 because it is not 3D. The person is complaining why the game is not what he want it to be, Instead of reviewing the actual game for what it is.same reviewer who gave TOTK a 6/10 btw lmaooooo
The DF review goes into it in depth. The 1.1 patch makes the framerate a very solid 30FPS with the only consistent dips when using ultra hand in busy areas.Any reviews mention frame rate or Switch hardware limitations? Not playing TotK until new Nintendo hardware gets launched. Regardless, congrats to Zelda fans and Switch owners.
... Are you talking about BOTW or Immortals?Ah yes, the game where your fantastic powers are used to move around boxes and shiny balls for 80 hours.
Those games may have taken place in new locations, this is still set in the same place.No, a pattern called map reuse. Sequels have not traditionally used slightly modified maps.
read the review, it's actually quite thorough.what a troll.
Haha waggle waggle no thank youSkyward Sword had really innovative controls, some of the best dungeons in the franchise and a great story. There's no quite game like it and people try to make it seem like "eh that game was meh" when it's so far from the truth.
A "bad" Zelda game is still better than most games out there.
The scores it's getting aren't surprising, performance, graphics, and much of what you said here would have points knocked off for other games, Zelda games don't get points knocked off. That's how it's been for decades now. even legit mediocre game is going to have over a 90 for a main title.So, they rehashed the same armour, same enemies, cooking, finding koroks and shrine structure... Why fix something that ain't broken perhaps, but this is very disappointing. I like each zelda to feel new and refreshing, so this is a bit disappointing. Also, it's been 6 years for a major Nintendo studio. Not an acceptable standard.
Well there's your problem. You can't waggle your way through fights in SSHaha waggle waggle no thank you
Gawd I hate this kind of mentality. Its stupid.ToTK is better than your favourite game
Skyward Sword had really innovative controls, some of the best dungeons in the franchise and a great story. There's no quite game like it and people try to make it seem like "eh that game was meh" when it's so far from the truth.
A "bad" Zelda game is still better than most games out there.
Twilight Princess (on the Wii) has waggle controls. Skyward Sword definitely did not.Haha waggle waggle no thank you
You're trying too hard manI want more 6s! Come on clickbaiters!