Read my post again, I said it's fine to keep the haters in this thread, I don't have a problem with it. Did you misread that sentence?
And also, read my older posts again, there are many people in this thread and other parts of the internet who keep saying this show is destroying Tolkien lore. They provide absolutely zero evidence of this at all or it's surface level shit like skin colour. In all the years on NeoGAF and the internet in general I have never seen this much hate based around a LOTR project, not in the original PJ trilogy, not in the Hobbit trilogy, not with the recent LOTR games, it's insane. All of a sudden, out of no where, there are thousands of Tolkien experts. And these thousands of Tolkien experts popped up as soon as the first bit of black skin was shown.
I haven't had any issue with anyone disliking this show due to the show itself. If they don't like it due to the script, the acting, the choreography, the lighting, they find it boring, whatever, fine. I have asked for examples as to why the script is bad in comparison to the PJ trilogy but that's to gain an understanding. When it comes to lore, I've asked what the show has destroyed and I get zero answers. Maybe someone says Galadriel shouldn't be a warrior and that's about it, my understanding is that very little is written about Galadriel in the Second Age, I meant the wiki states the following:
"Celeborn and Galadriel traveled first to Lindon, where they ruled over a group of Elves as a fiefdom under Gil-galad, the High King of the Ñoldor. Sometime later, they had a daughter, Celebrían."
If that is all that is written about Galadrial of the start of the Second Age, there is so much wriggle room to create new stories. As long as Celeborn shows up at Lindon at some point, says they haven't seen each other in thousands of years and Galadriel stops being a warrior, the lore isn't broken. If I'm wrong, please correct me. If there are other examples of lore breaking, please show me.