Do you even know what you're saying? Are you implying that, God forbid, any game that functional should be considered as 'eh, it's alright'? A bad game can be caused by poor pacing, a bad story, poor controls, an unsatisfying player interaction, and plenty of other reasons.
Is The Order: 1886 functional? Yes (although there are still bugs).
Is it good? Like, really good? Is it the new benchmark in gameplay, story, and player agency? No. Noooooooooo. No no no no no.
It's a middling experience that takes every chance to grab the controls from the player with cutscenes or QTEs, and presents an interesting world which is held back by a predictable and hackneyed story with a HUGE cliffhanger at the end to bait you into a sequel, rather than providing a satisfying conclusion to the introduction to a series.
But hey! It ain't broke, so it deserves an 8, right? Right?! /s