The Unfinished Swan Review Thread

2. Why would that possibly matter?

And the link is broken because the site has been banned.

Why would it matter? Seriously? I get what you're trying to say; people shouldn't care about numbers but what is actually said in the review (or rather I assume what you meant to say, as you didn't have time to say it I suppose). But nonetheless that's not how the world works.

And if the site is banned then why in the name of all that's holy is there a link to it, especially if the link gets broken automatically? Is this a joke thread? :/
 
I need a demo to bite. I loved Journey, but Sound Shapes was very meh to me so I hope there's a demo this time...
 
Generally yeah. This gen, the vast majority of my purchases of new IPs have come after a demo, or trying the game first in some fashion.

Why would I risk throwing money away based on Internet hype?

Made that mistake only a couple of times this gen. Once on Castlevania on XBLA.

From your words, it's very obvious to me that you couldn't enjoy Journey. You're saying you only play it safe, so probably you don't value the sense of an unexpected discovery, which coincidentally is what this game is about.
 
Why would it matter? Seriously? I get what you're trying to say; people shouldn't care about numbers but what is actually said in the review (or rather I assume what you meant to say, as you didn't have time to say it I suppose). But nonetheless that's not how the world works.

And if the site is banned then why in the name of all that's holy is there a link to it, especially if the link gets broken automatically? Is this a joke thread? :/

Yeah, I was being serious. Were you? Because honestly, "not how the world works"? Just because Metacritic is the status quo, doesn't mean the world revolves around it. That's stupid. There are plenty of reviews in other mediums that don't even bother with a point scale or final rating at all.

And obviously the OP didn't notice the link was broken before having to rush off. And either way, one broken link doesn't make a fucking joke thread.
 
I agree with Eurogamer when they say the game feels like a incoherent patchwork of gameplay ideas (or something along those lines). 6 is too harsh tho.

As a frame rate whore, what I disliked the most was the first half of chapter 3. Cool ideas there, but 60fps was no more :/

First and second chapters are the best IMO. Last one is
just credits :/
 
Game Informer 8.0

Similar to Journey, The Unfinished Swan is brief, visually stunning, and more focused on the experience than with testing combat skills or platforming prowess. Some collectibles are available in the form of hidden balloons and storybook pages, which might bring completionists back for additional playthroughs. While I feel that the overall experience didn’t impact me as much as Journey, and won’t stay with me as long, it still has plenty of unique ideas to offer.

http://www.gameinformer.com/games/t...ve/2012/10/15/the-unfinished-swan-review.aspx

VentureBeat

You could argue that the unsatisfying ending leaves some room for a sequel or downloadable content (DLC). But gamers are not necessarily a forgiving lot. If you ask them to spend hours playing a game, and then deny them an interesting ending, then the result isn’t good. Just as the folks at BioWare who created the ending for Mass Effect 3. This ending isn’t as bad as that one, but it is ambiguous.
This game started out with two people and grew to 12. And all of them get some extra-generous credits at the end. But it is astounding to me that such a small team can create a game that is as moving and inspiring as The Unfinished Swan. It is the kind of game that big game studios won’t make, to their loss.

Score: 88/100

http://venturebeat.com/2012/10/15/t...full-of-emptiness-review/#1F5gGB1lZD4WmglX.99
 
The only review that matters will be the Insomnia.ac one.
I'll never understand how people can take one review as gospel, while thoroughly dismissing everyone else. Why not read a few, from a variety of sources, extract the salient points, then use that to make your own informed decision? I mean, I'm not saying you won't make your own choice, but why rely on one review? Is the reviewer a gaming Oracle or something?
 
The 9's - "Gorgeous art."
The 6's - "Too artsy."

9s - Critiquing it as an interactive art piece (2deep4u good art, i cried playing this game and it made me rethink my marriage)
6s - Critiquing it as a game (where da game at? barely interactive, limited ruleset, etc.)

I'll never understand how people can take one review as gospel, while thoroughly dismissing everyone else. Why not read a few, from a variety of sources, extract the salient points, then use that to make your own informed decision? I mean, I'm not saying you won't make your own choice, but why rely on one review? Is the reviewer a gaming Oracle or something?

Nope. He's just going to tear the game apart and label it a piece of shit for "art fagots" like he does in most of the indie game reviews he does. It'll definitely be the most entertaining, well written and vitriolic review of the bunch.
 
Destructoid 7.5

An odd bit of dreariness aside, The Unfinished Swan is still a rock-solid game with oodles of character. While stopping short of the heights seen in some of Sony's other exclusive "art" games, Unfinished Swan remains a worthy adventure, one of many that continue to define the PlayStation Network as a braver and more experimental place than the downloadable markets of Sony's competition. If it had expanded the latter half of the adventure more and focused less on the plant puzzles, it would have been near-perfect.

As it stands, The Unfinished Swan is a good way to casually wile away some spare hours. You can't complain too much about that.


http://www.destructoid.com/review-the-unfinished-swan-236652.phtml#LefjXKYcr7XYmTCe.99
 
Sony have really pushed the envelope in my opinion on these new I.P's...and I love it...even if they come off not well fleshed out I enjoy the concepts and idea's very much.
 
Why would I risk throwing money away based on Internet hype?

Made that mistake only a couple of times this gen. Once on Castlevania on XBLA.

confused-eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3-329.gif
 
I was expecting a more uniformly positive reception, but some interesting reviews. It's going to be hard to dodge all the discussion for a week I'm sure.
 
I was expecting a more uniformly positive reception, but some interesting reviews. It's going to be hard to dodge all the discussion for a week I'm sure.

Me too, thought it was going to be the critical darling to rival Journey. Kind of surprised how low couple of the scores are given it won best downloadable at E3. Sounds like they had some fantastic ideas that just weren't realised enough.
 
Me too, thought it was going to be the critical darling to rival Journey. Kind of surprised how low couple of the scores are given it won best downloadable at E3. Sounds like they had some fantastic ideas that just weren't realised enough.
I am confuse, these are every high reviews besides 2.
 
Me too, thought it was going to be the critical darling to rival Journey. Kind of surprised how low couple of the scores are given it won best downloadable at E3. Sounds like they had some fantastic ideas that just weren't realised enough.

The ideas are realized... IMO. And they are fantastic.

A few dissident views should not be at all surprising for a game that A) is very tough to nail down B) is short, on purpose and C) is very much about mechanics design, which many games aren't.
 
The ideas are realized... IMO. And they are fantastic.

A few dissident views should not be at all surprising for a game that A) is very tough to nail down B) is short, on purpose and C) is very much about mechanics design, which many games aren't.

That's good to hear. The low scoring reviews don't put me off one iota anyway. I played Papo and Yo which rated a lot worse with critics and really enjoyed it.
 
You know a couple means two right? Journey got a slew of perfect scores and rave reviews from critics. TUS, not so much. It seems to be in the 8 range, good game and worth playing, not GOTY material.

GOTY is completely subjective, so i have no idea how you can say that
 
to be honest, ThatGameCompany took 3 games to reach that critically well reviewed window.

Flow, and Flower wasn't received very well, (although flower is better than Journey for me)


the fact that TUS has review scores near Journey is groundbreaking. they still have 2 more games to produce. (unless they be one trickponies)
 
You know a couple means two right? Journey got a slew of perfect scores and rave reviews from critics. TUS, not so much. It seems to be in the 8 range, good game and worth playing, not GOTY material.

By what objective metric do you measure "GOTY material"?

Wanna know the ironic thing about this game? It runs on the Gamebryo engine.

How is it ironic? There are a bunch of games on PS3 that use Gamebryo. There's nothing wrong with the engine and like with all engine and hardware combinations, there are constraints that you have to work around. It would be ironic if TUS stored a shitload of data into the memory successfully and had no slowdowns or framerate drops but that isn't the case.
 
My only concern is that I don't know if the game will get too repetitive by shooting the black thingy over and over with no variety.

I've only seen the teaser and story trailer and haven't read any review. So my concern might be unnecessary.
 
to be honest, ThatGameCompany took 3 games to reach that critically well reviewed window.

Flow, and Flower wasn't received very well, (although flower is better than Journey for me)
Flower's Metacritic rating is 87, doesn't look like this will match that.
 
Looking forward to it, sometimes you just need something that is a bit more arty fartsy and more of an experience to haul you away from the "serious" "realistic" "AAAAAAA" games we get these days.

to be honest, ThatGameCompany took 3 games to reach that critically well reviewed window.

Flow, and Flower wasn't received very well, (although flower is better than Journey for me)
holy crap, i thought it was in the mid 70 range.

okay... well.... Flow! :P

I was going to say, it was reviewed and received pretty well from memory.
 
Nope. He's just going to tear the game apart and label it a piece of shit for "art fagots" like he does in most of the indie game reviews he does. It'll definitely be the most entertaining, well written and vitriolic review of the bunch.

I can never tell if that person is some unfunny, dolan-esque internet meme, funny to those wrapped up in internet board culture, or if people take his self-indulgent, undergrad Libertarian spew, laden with casual sexism and bigotry, seriously.
 
I can never tell if that person is some unfunny, dolan-esque internet meme, funny to those wrapped up in internet board culture, or if people take his self-indulgent, undergrad Libertarian spew, laden with casual sexism and bigotry, seriously.

He's a caricature of a caricature, as far as I'm concerned.
 
You know a couple means two right? Journey got a slew of perfect scores and rave reviews from critics. TUS, not so much. It seems to be in the 8 range, good game and worth playing, not GOTY material.

Oh well. I won't play it then. Thanks for making me steer clear!
 
Hah.

1. Isn't that a store, and not a professional journalist?
2. What kind of score is that, an excellent/what?
3. Link is broken anyway.

I like to think I'm a professional journalist, I do get paid to write f/t and have been writing for a long time - TSA / VG247 and many before that. Thanks for the vote of confidence though. You could always read the review.

I'm not a store, I work from home, independent of the store :D

p.s TSA review is awesome, NoFi being top notch as usual.
 
BTW NeoGaf doesn't seem to like my links, I've no idea why.

But you can find the review at (no space between shopto and .net obviously)

http://www.shopto .net/news/40981/t...ellent score, which is our second top rating.
 
Top Bottom