Astral Dog
Member
Hehe you got them Trump
CNN statement:
The president tweeted a gif about him punching CNN. How is that not encouraging violence???"enourages violence against reporters" seems like quite the reach. It takes away from an otherwise sensible statement.
.
"enourages violence against reporters" seems like quite the reach.
.
"enourages violence against reporters" seems like quite the reach. It takes away from an otherwise sensible statement.
.
The president tweeted a gif about him punching CNN. How is that not encouraging violence???
Trump better pray no follower of his ever attacks a CNN reporter after this tweet.
Trump's followers are hardcore enough to be persuaded to do something to that affect with tweets like that, though."enourages violence against reporters" seems like quite the reach. It takes away from an otherwise sensible statement.
.
"enourages violence against reporters" seems like quite the reach. It takes away from an otherwise sensible statement.
.
No one would perceive that as a threat; I hope they dont, Bossert said, referring to the tweet.
What does the gif show then?"enourages violence against reporters" seems like quite the reach. It takes away from an otherwise sensible statement.
.
The president tweeted a gif about him punching CNN. How is that not encouraging violence???
Trump better pray no follower of his ever attacks a CNN reporter after this tweet.
No it isn't. He's been doing it for 2 years and this gif is an attempt to normalize that and make it funny.
You do need to realize this isn't the first time Trump has suggested violence against someone, right?It's him clotheslining a logo. "Trump vs. CNN".
To extrapolate the suggestion of violence on reporters from that seems ridiculous to me. Anyone who would decide to attack a reporter based on that .gif would be solely at fault. That's a deranged intepretation that could be warped from anything innocuous.
Americans, how have you genuinely not managed to die of embarrassment yet?
Yeah its like they want to beat him when he is at his low (is that the saying ) wich isn't too bad i guess."enourages violence against reporters" seems like quite the reach. It takes away from an otherwise sensible statement.
.
Trump's followers are hardcore enough to be persuaded to do something to that affect with tweets like that, though.
You do need to realize this isn't the first time Trump has suggested violence against someone, right?
DOJ logo:
You do need to realize this isn't the first time Trump has suggested violence against someone, right?
Ok. Sure.It is like everyone has amnesia all of a sudden. This is part of a pattern of rhetoric. Anyone not focusing on that is simply playing into Trump and his supporter's hands by giving him the benefit of the doubt that he is just "joking".
It's him clotheslining a logo. "Trump vs. CNN".
To extrapolate the suggestion of violence on reporters from that seems ridiculous to me. Anyone who would decide to attack a reporter based on that .gif would be solely at fault. That's a deranged intepretation that could be warped from anything innocuous.
If he weren't the president, I might love this tweet.
As it stands, it's kind of horrific.
It's him clotheslining a logo. "Trump vs. CNN".
To extrapolate the suggestion of violence on reporters from that seems ridiculous to me. Anyone who would decide to attack a reporter based on that .gif would be solely at fault. That's a deranged intepretation that could be warped from anything innocuous.
Your president is insane.
Trump doesn't drink.
THIS IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATESDid he do that with a wrestling .gif too? Otherwise I'm not seeing the relevance - I'm not saying Trump hasn't ever suggested violence against someone, I'm saying that intepreting a cartoonish tweet as the suggestion of violence seems ridiculous.
It's him clotheslining a logo. "Trump vs. CNN".
To extrapolate the suggestion of violence on reporters from that seems ridiculous to me. Anyone who would decide to attack a reporter based on that .gif would be solely at fault. That's a deranged intepretation that could be warped from anything innocuous.
Oh the conservatives love to play the victims. They would have impeached Obama before calling it fascism and/or nazism.I wonder what the right's response would have been if it was Obama tweeting himself "beating up" Fox news.
CNN couldn't wish for a better situation. Think of the ratings.
They aren't. I was a Bernie supporter and I'm not only offended at this assertion, I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. 90% of us voted for Hillary, so you can either show receipts or can it. Thanks.Why are diehard Bernie supporters always lowkey supporting Trump?
Yes.Did he do that with a wrestling .gif too?
He is doing a physical act on CNN. He is promoting violence by being violent in the clip. That's what is being done.
If you're at the point where you're trying to determine what severity of violent acts do or do not constitute encouragement, maybe you don't really have a good argument."Promoting violence". This is a wrestling .gif. This isn't a .gif of a plane dropping bombs onto a building labeled with 'CNN'. It isn't superimposing the face of any journalist into the .gif.
I don't see how that's a reponse to what I've said, but I'll try to make sense of your point.
Trump, and unintelligent man who has made clear suggestions of violence in the past now has decided to use wrestling .gifs to convey that suggestion to his followers?
I'd present an alternative - Trump, being the stupid person that he is, saw a .gif that represented him defeating CNN (the organization) and decided to tweet it out.
"Promoting violence". This is a wrestling .gif. This isn't a .gif of a plane dropping bombs onto a building labeled with 'CNN'. It isn't superimposing the face of any journalist into the .gif.
It seems, clear as day, meant to represent 'Trump thrashing CNN', not 'tackle a reporter and bash their skull in'.
If you're at the point where you're trying to determine degrees of violent acts that do or do not constitute encouragement, maybe you don't really have a good argument.
Master troll tactics level 9000.
And you all eat it up per usual.
You're okay with the president being a troll?
Master troll tactics level 9000.
And you all eat it up per usual.
Do you think you can say with confidence that of all his millions of supporters, absolutely none of them will ever feel like it's okay to show similar aggression towards people who work at CNN?No degrees of violent acts. Indication of a suggestion. The examples I give would be "blow up this building" and "attack this person".
But the .gif is just "watch me, Trump, beating up CNN".