C'mon guys. No matter what your politics, that's hilarious.
Yeah I found it pretty funny. I like how he just doesn't care anymore. 😂😂😂
C'mon guys. No matter what your politics, that's hilarious.
I don't see how that's a reponse to what I've said, but I'll try to make sense of your point.
Trump, and unintelligent man who has made clear suggestions of violence in the past now has decided to use wrestling .gifs to convey that suggestion to his followers?
I'd present an alternative - Trump, being the stupid person that he is, saw a .gif that represented him defeating CNN (the organization) and decided to tweet it out.
"Promoting violence". This is a wrestling .gif. This isn't a .gif of a plane dropping bombs onto a building labeled 'CNN'. It isn't superimposing the face of any journalist into the .gif.
It seems, clear as day, meant to represent 'Trump thrashing CNN (the organization)', not 'tackle a reporter and bash their skull in'.
It seems like he's bored with the job already.Yeah I found it pretty funny. I like how he just doesn't care anymore. 😂😂😂
Yeah I found it pretty funny. I like how he just doesn't care anymore. 😂😂😂
Yeah I found it pretty funny. I like how he just doesn't care anymore. 😂😂😂
You really think that tweet will start a war in the USA? What time is this?Just when a I thought he wouldn't go any further I find this news... Godspeed you fellow americans, there's still a long way ahead and it seems this could get even worse, I just hope it stays like this and not starting a war
It might be if there was a reason for his supposed take down. Did I miss why he thinks he destroyed CNN?C'mon guys. No matter what your politics, that's hilarious.
You really think that tweet will start a war in the USA? What time is this?
You really think that tweet will start a war in the USA? What time is this?
I don't see how that's a reponse to what I've said, but I'll try to make sense of your point.
Trump, and unintelligent man who has made clear suggestions of violence in the past now has decided to use wrestling .gifs to convey that suggestion to his followers?
I'd present an alternative - Trump, being the stupid person that he is, saw a .gif that represented him defeating CNN (the organization) and decided to tweet it out.
Y'all getting played again with the outrage at this.
This isn't anything new, he's been advocating this bullshit since the primary.
His one and only skill is to create controversy that will galvanise his base once the outrage over his next edgy tweet gets coverage.
The more outraged we become the more appeased his base becomes.
And like fucking clock work y'all get played like bitches.
He'd rather have you looking at his tweets than talking policy. Seriously.
Do you think you can say with confidence that of all his millions of supporters, absolutely none of them will ever feel like it's okay to show similar aggression towards people who work at CNN?
What the fucccckkkk. Why do we keep seeing variations of this wack ass argument today?? We aren't fucking idiots distracted by the next shiny thing. Ain't nobody forgot all the b.s. he's trying to pass off as "policy."
No - some unstable people can warp innocuous things to find the justification of violence. But to say "[Trump] enourages violence against reporters" seems, as I said originally, like a reach. It seems to me, still, that the intent of the tweet was to represent Trump defeating an organization.
If you want to say 'people could use this to justify violence acts against reporters to themselves' fair enough, but the suggestion that the tweet was intended to convey "attack journalists" seems ridiculous to me still.
It's because they had to retract a story about the Russia investigationIt might be if there was a reason for his supposed take down. Did I miss why he thinks he destroyed CNN?
What the fucccckkkk. Why do we keep seeing variations of this wack ass argument today?? We aren't fucking idiots distracted by the next shiny thing. Ain't nobody forgot all the b.s. he's trying to pass off as "policy."
Which one/when was it posted?It's because they had to retract a story about the Russia investigation
What the fucccckkkk. Why do we keep seeing variations of this wack ass argument today?? We aren't fucking idiots distracted by the next shiny thing. Ain't nobody forgot all the b.s. he's trying to pass off as "policy."
It'll always be seen as one or the other: Trump's a genius at diversions, or Trump's so unintelligent that he can't stay on message.
I'm not sure when the original article was posted but the retraction was only a few days agoWhich one/when was it posted?
Y'all getting played again with the outrage at this.
This isn't anything new, he's been advocating this bullshit since the primary.
His one and only skill is to create controversy that will galvanise his base once the outrage over his next edgy tweet gets coverage.
The more outraged we become the more appeased his base becomes.
And like fucking clock work y'all get played like bitches.
He'd rather have you looking at his tweets than talking policy. Seriously.
His sole purpose is to aggravate people. We knew this shit was going to happen as soon as he became president.
These reactions from the left harden and enthuse his support.
What did you think was going to happen? That upon election he was gonna start roleplaying George Washington?
This was always going to be a fucking shit show. Getting his recent BS tweet trending, is what he's counting on you doing.
So you're one of those people who can't discuss about more than one topic at once? How does it work? Does it take a day or a week? When can you change the focus? Once a month? I'm a bit lost how this mono-tasking mind works.
His sole purpose is to aggravate people. We knew this shit was going to happen as soon as he became president.
These reactions from the left harden and enthuse his support.
What did you think was going to happen? That upon election he was gonna start roleplaying George Washington?
This was always going to be a fucking shit show. Getting his recent BS tweet trending, is what he's counting on you doing.
Do you spend 1/10th the energy you spend lecturing Trump opponents on lecturing Trump supporters? If not, I'm not sure your approach is as effective as you seem to believe. Stop yelling at people who agree with you and focus on the actual problem.No , yeah genius strategy there captain condescendo.
Let's signal boost his bullshit instead and thusly feed his base with our outrage.
Good idea.
Let's all multi task and create big threads about how appalled we are at the tweets specifically fucking designed to appall us.
I'm just saying, you're getting gamed.
The tweet is gone. Did Twitter remove it?
No , yeah genius strategy there captain condescendo.
Let's signal boost his bullshit instead and thusly feed his base with our outrage.
Good idea.
Let's all multi task and create big threads about how appalled we are at the tweets specifically fucking designed to appall us.
I'm just saying, you're getting gamed.
C'mon guys. No matter what your politics, that's hilarious.
Outraged? Gamed? You seem to be misreading the reaction. I don't think Trump was trying to generate an accumulative "ugh" and people calling him stupidNo , yeah genius strategy there captain condescendo.
Let's signal boost his bullshit instead and thusly feed his base with our outrage.
Good idea.
Let's all multi task and create big threads about how appalled we are at the tweets specifically fucking designed to appall us.
I'm just saying, you're getting gamed.
No , yeah genius strategy there captain condescendo.
Let's signal boost his bullshit instead and thusly feed his base with our outrage.
Good idea.
Let's all multi task and create big threads about how appalled we are at the tweets specifically fucking designed to appall us.
I'm just saying, you're getting gamed.
"enourages violence against reporters" seems like quite the reach. It takes away from an otherwise sensible statement.
.
There was an incident if I remember where a reporter was body slammed by security.
No , yeah genius strategy there captain condescendo.
Let's signal boost his bullshit instead and thusly feed his base with our outrage.
Good idea.
Let's all multi task and create big threads about how appalled we are at the tweets specifically fucking designed to appall us.
I'm just saying, you're getting gamed.
Do you spend 1/10th the energy you spend lecturing Trump opponents on lecturing Trump supporters? If not, I'm not sure your approach is as effective as you seem to believe. Stop yelling at people who agree with you and focus on the actual problem.
It's this high horse, I'm smarter than you all because I see right through his genius strategy that's just not founded in any kind of reality.
Democratic transgressions should be condemned, period.
He is the President of the United States. Not a 4chan shitposter. Get the difference?Master troll tactics level 9000.
And you all eat it up per usual.