• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

U.S. taps half-billion German phone calls, internet links in month: report

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you really believe that? This would mean that you have no boundaries whatsoever. You think alcohol is ok so you become an alcoholic.

If the extent of something is not a viable argument, then we might as well not do anything in this world...
I'm talking this case only. Why is building a database of metadata ok for 20,000 people but no 80 million (which its not doing because there are only so many employees)?
 

Croyles

Member
It's a question of method, which includes scale. There would be ways to supervise only certain groups and their communication, but instead they're supervising millions of people, the vast majority of which are - beyond any doubt - innocent.



You realize that statement makes no sense, right? No one is saying it's per se wrong to monitor the activities of (presumably) dangerous individuals. If you apply that train of thought to other actions - such as shooting terrorists - it becomes utterly stupid and disgusting.

Actions depend on context.



I'm sure there's countries that even if they had the chance wouldn't pull the shit the US does (on a regular basis).

Maybe, but it is just guesswork at the moment. For arguments sake, I am going to say they would, even if I don't really personally believe it.
I'm glad we are sort of on the same page here though.
 
It's a question of method, which includes scale. There would be ways to supervise only certain groups and their communication, but instead they're supervising millions of people, the vast majority of which are - beyond any doubt - innocent.



You realize that statement makes no sense, right? No one is saying it's per se wrong to monitor the activities of (presumably) dangerous individuals. If you apply that train of thought to other actions - such as shooting terrorists - it becomes utterly stupid and disgusting.

You realize their not monitoring the activities (i.e. looking at their emails or listening to phone calls) of those innocent people. They're inserting call data and IP logs into a register and running links to see if anything pops up. Then they would actually "spy" The same thing the german's own network works (at a smaller scale because they don't have the resources)

Der Spiegl said:
At key junctions for digital traffic in the country, the German foreign intelligence agency has set up its own technical accesses. They work like a police inspection on the Autobahn: A portion of the data stream is diverted to a parking lot and checked. Copies of the flagged-down data are directly forwarded to BND headquarters in Pullach, near Munich, where they are more carefully examined.

The largest traffic control takes place in Frankfurt, in a data processing center owned by the Association of the German Internet Industry. Via this hub, the largest in Europe, e-mails, phone calls, Skype conversations and text messages flow from regions that interest the BND like Russia and Eastern Europe, along with crisis areas like Somalia, countries in the Middle East, and states like Pakistan and Afghanistan.

German law allows the BND to monitor any form of communication that has a foreign element, be it a mobile phone conversation, a Facebook chat or an exchange via AOL Messenger. For the purposes of "strategic communications surveillance," the foreign intelligence agency is allowed to copy and review 20 percent of this data traffic. There is even a regulation requiring German providers "to maintain a complete copy of the telecommunications."

I don't see protections for foreign citizens in germany's laws

German Internet surfers are officially off-limits. If e-mail addresses surface that end in ".de" (for Germany), they have to be erased. The international dialing code for Germany, 0049, and IP addresses that were apparently given to customers in Germany also pass through the net. The idea here is to avoid infringing upon civil rights that are guaranteed in Germany -- analogous to the US, where the full weight of the surveillance state should not fall on its own citizens, but rather on foreigners.

During day-to-day Internet usage, though, it's hard to differentiate between "German" and "non-German." At first glance, it's not evident where users live whose information is saved by Yahoo, Google or Apple. And how are the agencies supposed to spot a Taliban commander who has acquired an email address with German provider GMX? Meanwhile, the status of Facebook chats and conversations on Skype remains completely unclear.
I mean this is literally the same stuff people were yelling at the NSA about.
 

Tamanon

Banned
You realize their not monitoring the activities (i.e. looking at their emails or listening to phone calls) of those innocent people. They're inserting call data and IP logs into a register and running links to see if anything pops up. Then they would actually "spy" The same thing the german's own network works (at a smaller scale because they don't have the resources)



I don't see protections for foreign citizens in germany's laws


I mean this is literally the same stuff people were yelling at the NSA about.

And what's funny is that the US system and the German system allow them to spy on their own people just by trading coverage. Convenient.
 

Croyles

Member
You realize their not monitoring the activities (i.e. looking at their emails or listening to phone calls) of those innocent people. They're inserting call data and IP logs into a register and running links to see if anything pops up. Then they would actually "spy" The same thing the german's own network works (at a smaller scale because they don't have the resources)



I don't see protections for foreign citizens in germany's laws


I mean this is literally the same stuff people were yelling at the NSA about.

Hurray. Seems Germany really would be just as bad if it had the means. This still doesn't make me happy, and I don't see why it should make anyone happy.

What a fucked up world.
 

jimi_dini

Member

lol. Sorry, was at work and was kinda busy. I should have been more polite :)

The adult world is an evil place; the best we can do is keep our ears open - even if that means spying on allies. Countless lives have been saved because of our intelligence community doing things we probably wouldn't like knowing about.

If it was really about "saving lifes", governments would instead disallow smoking, drinking alcohol and other things. On top of that US would restrict gun ownership and would also offer mandatory statutory health insurance. That would save a lot more lifes than spying ever could.

It's about power and control. And that's basically it.
 

FoxSpirit

Junior Member
Hurray. Seems Germany really would be just as bad if it had the means. This still doesn't make me happy, and I don't see why it should make anyone happy.

What a fucked up world.
You can be sure if Germany was caught recording basically all the connection data in the US and leisurly wiretapping random civilians there would be a shitstorm in the US too. On top of wiretapping Obama.

It's not as if uncovering top spies has never produced fallout between nations in the past. So expecting to say, "it's just international espionage" is completely disregarding the nature of the game which is "don't get caught". And god did you get caught.

There is currently a media shitstorm across every newspaper big and small and it will be there for weeks, especially since nothing else of major interest is currently upcoming. No "champions league bailout" so to speak :p
 

Croyles

Member
You can be sure if Germany was caught recording basically all the connection data in the US and leisurly wiretapping random civilians there would be a shitstorm in the US too. On top of wiretapping Obama.

It's not as if uncovering top spies has never produced fallout between nations in the past. So expecting to say, "it's just international espionage" is completely disregarding the nature of the game which is "don't get caught". And god did you get caught.

There is currently a media shitstorm across every newspaper big and small and it will be there for weeks, especially since nothing else of major interest is currently upcoming. No "champions league bailout" so to speak :p

I just spent the last few pages arguing against apathy in this regard whether it be U.S. Germany, U.K. or China. The lengths to which espionage is considered ok to these governments is just messed up.
 

lednerg

Member
Please just tell me I haven't been spending time arguing with truthers and/or chemtrail believers.

EDIT: \/\/\/ Good to hear. I'm only asking because someone on facebook reminded me how deep down the rabbit hole some folks go. It's best to not even engage with some types of people.
 

Croyles

Member
Please just tell me I haven't been spending time arguing with truthers and/or chemtrail believers.

When was this even brought up? I never believed in those.

EDIT: \/\/\/ Good to hear. I'm only asking because someone on facebook reminded me how deep down the rabbit hole some folks go. It's best to not even engage with some types of people.

You can get crazy conspiracy theorists on the one hand and apathetic cynics on the other. It's tough not to fall down one of those holes when you argue about something and it gets out of hand, but even people that do fall down one of those holes can still have valid points.

I'm just going to put one last thing out there. If what Obama has recently stated is true, that everyone is spying on everyone and so that makes it ok, doesn't this effectively make whistle-blowers the people's equivalent to spy agencies, or about as good as we are going to get any time soon? Why then is it so important to jail him and Assange (who despite seemingly being a narcissistic prick, his WikiLeaks has in my opinion been a good thing that has helped some of my country's shenanigans see the light of day).
If everyone already knew about the quality and quantity of espionage happening, then surely Snowden's leaks would just be deemed unimportant and they wouldn't bother trying to justify anything.

I'd rather live in a so called second world country that doesn't need to resort to these tactics. I am sure there are a few countries left in the world that haven't been completely tainted. This is actually something I have considered doing for quite some time. Most of these 'first world luxuries' I can pass on if it means that Stasi levels of espionage are the new benchmark on the moral compass.
 

FoxSpirit

Junior Member
When was this even brought up? I never believed in those.



You can get crazy conspiracy theorists on the one hand and apathetic cynics on the other. It's tough not to fall down one of those holes when you argue about something and it gets out of hand, but even people that do fall down one of those holes can still have valid points.

I'm just going to put one last thing out there. If what Obama has recently stated is true, that everyone is spying on everyone and so that makes it ok, doesn't this effectively make whistle-blowers the people's equivalent to spy agencies, or about as good as we are going to get any time soon? Why then is it so important to jail him and Assange (who despite seemingly being a narcissistic prick, his WikiLeaks has in my opinion been a good thing that has helped some of my country's shenanigans see the light of day).
If everyone already knew about the quality and quantity of espionage happening, then surely Snowden's leaks would just be deemed unimportant and they wouldn't bother trying to justify anything.

I'd rather live in a so called second world country that doesn't need to resort to these tactics. I am sure there are a few countries left in the world that haven't been completely tainted. This is actually something I have considered doing for quite some time. Most of these 'first world luxuries' I can pass on if it means that Stasi levels of espionage are the new benchmark on the moral compass.
I like you. A lot.
 

Tamanon

Banned
When was this even brought up? I never believed in those.



You can get crazy conspiracy theorists on the one hand and apathetic cynics on the other. It's tough not to fall down one of those holes when you argue about something and it gets out of hand, but even people that do fall down one of those holes can still have valid points.

I'm just going to put one last thing out there. If what Obama has recently stated is true, that everyone is spying on everyone and so that makes it ok, doesn't this effectively make whistle-blowers the people's equivalent to spy agencies, or about as good as we are going to get any time soon? Why then is it so important to jail him and Assange (who despite seemingly being a narcissistic prick, his WikiLeaks has in my opinion been a good thing that has helped some of my country's shenanigans see the light of day).
If everyone already knew about the quality and quantity of espionage happening, then surely Snowden's leaks would just be deemed unimportant and they wouldn't bother trying to justify anything.

I'd rather live in a so called second world country that doesn't need to resort to these tactics. I am sure there are a few countries left in the world that haven't been completely tainted. This is actually something I have considered doing for quite some time. Most of these 'first world luxuries' I can pass on if it means that Stasi levels of espionage are the new benchmark on the moral compass.

Nobody wants to jail Assange. Sweden wants to interview him/prosecute him for an alleged crime, but that's it.
 

Kinyou

Member
The adult world is an evil place; the best we can do is keep our ears open - even if that means spying on allies. Countless lives have been saved because of our intelligence community doing things we probably wouldn't like knowing about. But the line that our government can never cross is the 4th Amendment - and the PRISM program is skating that line way too much. (EDIT: as far as I know)
Saving countless lives by spying on Germans? Sure...
 
Only a fool believes they're not abusing their data sets.
That's a claim I think you need to back up with evidence. Where is the injuries from the abuse? If there were false flags or wiretaps interrupting peoples lives, that needs to be taken seriously and subject to investigation. I don't want to say I'm in favor of everything the NSA wants to do being allowed. I'm in favor of checks and oversight and even censuring them when they over step their bounds. Its the tactic I don't have a problem with. If this was abused, I sure as hell would be up in arms and demanding responsibility but I've seen none of that yet, and I'm not about to take away a tool if its done good and in the absence of concrete and continued abuses. I think making policy on hypotheticals is silly.

I must add that I can't comment on everything in that article. That said, you forgot an important part:
The the same article talks about the BND wanting to increase its capability. The limited scope is seen as a weakness within the agency, its more of a reflection of other/outside limits, some of which are public opinion I admit (which is much less accepting of spying for obvious reasons), others are technical (the NSA has some of the worlds best computers and mathematicians) on german's spying power rather than benevolence on the part of the government.
 
Nobody wants to jail Assange. Sweden wants to interview him/prosecute him for an alleged crime, but that's it.

Sure. Assange said he was willing to return to Sweden if they can assure him that he won't be extradited to the USA. They declined.

http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/listeningpost/2013/06/2013614145837882956.html

That's a claim I think you need to back up with evidence. Where is the injuries from the abuse? If there were false flags or wiretaps interrupting peoples lives, that needs to be taken seriously and subject to investigation. I don't want to say I'm in favor of everything the NSA wants to do being allowed. I'm in favor of checks and oversight and even censuring them when they over step their bounds. Its the tactic I don't have a problem with. If this was abused, I sure as hell would be up in arms and demanding responsibility but I've seen none of that yet, and I'm not about to take away a tool if its done good and in the absence of concrete and continued abuses. I think making policy on hypotheticals is silly.

Jesus, what am I reading? "Making policy on hypotheticals is silly"? But that's how law makers work. And If it is possible to abuse this, then, in the worst case, it's already too late. This is a really naive view of the world. You need to think of checks before making policies.
 

jorma

is now taking requests
Nobody wants to jail Assange. Sweden wants to interview him/prosecute him for an alleged crime, but that's it.

This is fiction. If Sweden had the best of intentions in mind and no ulterior motive, they could have done a million things differently in order to resolve this.
 

lednerg

Member
And nobody ever tortured Manning. No sir.
Fuck Assange and fuck his puckered asshole waiting for us to kiss it. He doesn't know a goddamn thing, and neither does anyone that came within 10 yards of him. It's so fucking stupid. Ooh, wow, I'm like a spy or something - don't I feel special? What the fuck choice do we have according to him? It's so stupid. I'd learn more by watching Adult Swim.
Saving countless lives by spying on Germans? Sure...

Ask the Germans about spying on Austrians.

EDIT: Oh, whoops.
 

Billen

Banned
What we know the US imported from post-WWII Germany:
Rocket scientists, since Germany had developed the worlds most advanced rocket program.
This enabled the American space program.

What else does it seem that the US imported from post-WWII Germany:
Gestapo scientists, since Germany had developed the worlds most advanced police state.
This enabled, well, modern USA. :D
 

Oersted

Member
That's a claim I think you need to back up with evidence. Where is the injuries from the abuse? If there were false flags or wiretaps interrupting peoples lives, that needs to be taken seriously and subject to investigation. I don't want to say I'm in favor of everything the NSA wants to do being allowed. I'm in favor of checks and oversight and even censuring them when they over step their bounds. Its the tactic I don't have a problem with. If this was abused, I sure as hell would be up in arms and demanding responsibility but I've seen none of that yet, and I'm not about to take away a tool if its done good and in the absence of concrete and continued abuses. I think making policy on hypotheticals is silly.

You are as a US citizen hypothetically a threat to the USA that is why Obama has the right to kill you whereever and whenever he wants, without any trials to stop him. Practically. It was done already, practically.

You are as a US citizen hypothetically a threat to the USA that is why the US goverment is spying on you.

Laws, which are shitting on freedom rights and you are defending are based hypotheticals.
 

Croyles

Member
Fuck Assange and fuck his puckered asshole waiting for us to kiss it. He doesn't know a goddamn thing, and neither does anyone that came within 10 yards of him. It's so fucking stupid. Ooh, wow, I'm like a spy or something - don't I feel special? What the fuck choice do we have according to him? It's so stupid. I'd learn more by watching Adult Swim.

Whoa buddy, reel it back in. You're starting to go off the rails some and it's only going to hurt your argument.

:)
 
Kinda in "well duh" territory, but Snowden says that the NSA "is in bed together with the Germans":

http://www.spiegel.de/international...of-aiding-nsa-in-spying-efforts-a-909847.html

In an interview to be published in this week's issue of SPIEGEL, American intelligence agency whistleblower Edward Snowden criticizes the methods and power of the National Security Agency. Snowden said the NSA people are "in bed together with the Germans." He added that the NSA's "Foreign Affairs Directorate" is responsible for partnerships with other countries. The partnerships are organized in a way that authorities in other countries can "insulate their political leaders from the backlash" in the event it becomes public "how grievously they're violating global privacy." Telecommunications companies partner with the NSA and people are "normally selected for targeting" based on their "Facebook or webmail content."

...

At the same time, a new US Army base being built in Germany that is also to be used by the NSA has been approved by German authorities. Currently, a new Consolidated Intelligence center is being built in Wiesbaden. The bug-proof offices and a high-tech control center are being built for $124 million. As soon as the Wiesbaden facility is completed, a complex currently being used in Darmstadt wil be closed. The facilities are being built exclusively by American citizens who have security clearances. Even the material being used to construct the buildings originates from the United States and is guarded throughout the shipping process to Germany.

SPIEGEL is supposed to have something more substantial coming on the issue.
 
The only reason Canada, and those other countries, aren't spied on by the US is because your own government is spying on you and giving the info to the US.
There is no proof of Canada's involvement in this yet which is why I await the SPEIGEL report. I hope Canadians won't be passive if not supportive of this like Americans have been, because something like PRISM is unconstitutional to the core, and our opposition parties aren't in cahoots with the government like Democrats and Republicans are with the little oligarchy they have crafted for themselves.
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
So governments work with the NSA to stay in power.
 
There is no proof of Canada's involvement in this yet which is why I await the SPEIGEL report. I hope Canadians won't be passive if not supportive of this like Americans have been, because something like PRISM is unconstitutional to the core, and our opposition parties aren't in cahoots with the government like Democrats and Republicans are with the little oligarchy they have crafted for themselves.

Well, the CSEC seems to have been involved with the G20 snooping along with the NSA and GCHQ. Their logos are all at the bottom of page 2 of the leaks:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2013/jun/16/gchq-surveillance-the-documents
 
Well, the CSEC seems to have been involved with the G20 snooping along with the NSA and GCHQ. Their logos are all at the bottom of page 2 of the leaks:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2013/jun/16/gchq-surveillance-the-documents

That is indeed eyebrow raising. I know for a fact that CSEC does have a mandate to spy on foreign communications. They aren't allowed to spy on Canadians or people living in Canada though, or even take information from other spy agencies about Canadians. I hope the report sheds some light on what happened on G20 or the state of international intelligence sharing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom