Not really. Europeans demonstrate all the time, with success. We get people fired and sometimes even elect different people into power, crazy right?You can say the same about most other western countries to be honest. Especially with the state of post crash affairs.
Very relevant. Shows what you can do with "only metadata".
Not really. Europeans demonstrate all the time, with success. We get people fired and sometimes even elect different people into power, crazy right?
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ausländische_Militärbasen_in_Deutschland
Right, only 56,000.
What's most repulsive to me about all of this is the American public. Just completely apathetic, it's sad. When was the last time you had millions on the street? Your country is involved in so many scandals and crimes, yet the public never answers. What would need to happen?
Fuck you, I've got mine.
Gay marriage and banning firearms are more an issue than this for the average american.
Yes, but now no one can call it a tin foil conspiracy theory.
Not really. Europeans demonstrate all the time, with success. We get people fired and sometimes even elect different people into power, crazy right?
Very relevant. Shows what you can do with "only metadata".
I assume that if Snowden had information of Russian or Chinese agencies he would have shared those as well. Should he just keep his mouth shut because there are other bad guys as well? Also is it arguable if China and Russia have the capabilities to spy in such a magnitude.China and Russia do the same things that the NSA does. In fact, it's more than a bit hypocritical of Snowden to be throwing stones from there. Everybody in the intelligence communities knew it was going on, but now they have to deal with all the details being public knowledge. It's an unnecessary clusterfuck and it's all for what exactly? "Oh and my country is monitoring your citizens, they're big meanies. Derrr."
Are you really suggesting that every other (major) country does not spy? What is it that you think their intelligence services do?If I see one more post saying "Every country spies. Get over it" I am going to burst.
Give evidence or proof of any country doing this and their own citizens will be just as outraged.
How quickly the tune of some nationalists has changed as soon as the focus switched from the U.S. spying on their own citizens to spying on the world. Suddenly republicans are mute about small government and cry for Snowden's head.
I think there is a distinction between spying on governments and spying on private citizens and businesses. This was the very distinction commonly brought up by people distinguishing Chinese spying from American spying.Are you really suggesting that every other (major) country does not spy? What is it that you think their intelligence services do?
In the US this is a huge distinction. We are always taught that the spy agencies are prohibited from domestic spying. Of course they are doing international spying -- that is why they exist in the first place
Are you really suggesting that every other (major) country does not spy? What is it that you think their intelligence services do?
In the US this is a huge distinction. We are always taught that the spy agencies are prohibited from domestic spying. Of course they are doing international spying -- that is why they exist in the first place
Spelling this out for you guys since it keeps getting glossed over:
US government spying on it's own citizens = very bad
US government spying on non-US citizens = so what
There's a difference between the first set of revelations a few weeks back and what this thread is about. Please quit equating the two; it makes no sense.
I think there is a distinction between spying on governments and spying on private citizens and businesses. This was the very distinction commonly brought up by people distinguishing Chinese spying from American spying.
Vaguely suspecting and having proof are two very different things. Saying other countries do the same thing also completely misses the point. This is not about country vs country but about people vs government. If your government spies on other countries to this extent they WILL also spy on their own people. You can't have it both ways.
Spelling this out for you guys since it keeps getting glossed over:
US government spying on it's own citizens = very bad
US government spying on non-US citizens = so what
There's a difference between the first set of revelations a few weeks back and what this thread is about. Please quit treating the two like they're the same; it makes no sense.
Let me spell this out to all you nationalists. This is not ok to whoever you do it to. The U.S. as it is cannot live without trade, just as Germany can't live without trade.
No need to spell it out, that much is obvious. Still find it an unpleasant attitude.
perfect haha..............
I'm not excusing the behavior based on what other countries are doing, I'm responding to your claim that accusing other countries of the same is baseless. So I'm asking what do you think the intelligence services of those countries do? Why do they exist? The Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure for example
I think they exist to spy on foreign governments, possible terrorist threats and political figures, not to collect volumes of metadata on large swaths of private citizens and private businesses, with no additional check on how deep they can collect if the individual or business happens to be foreign. Even if you required judicial process, I'm sure something like a FISA court would rubber stamp and approve spying on the former, but I doubt they would approve the latter.I'm not excusing the behavior based on what other countries are doing*, I'm responding to your claim that accusing other countries of the same is baseless. So I'm asking what do you think the intelligence services of those countries do? Why do they exist? The Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure for example
My point is that spying on foreigners is why these agencies exist, so there is nothing to excuse in the first place (unlike Domestic spying)
That's great that you are not excusing. It's hard to tell when so many others seem to be.
The answer to your question should be pretty obvious though. It's fucking terrible, no matter in what country. The difference is when accusing without evidence or proof, you will just be dismissed as a conspiracy theorist. All of a sudden we have proof but it doesn't matter?
Pretty sure you don't know me.
The adult world is an evil place; the best we can do is keep our ears open - even if that means spying on allies. Countless lives have been saved because of our intelligence community doing things we probably wouldn't like knowing about. But the line that our government can never cross is the 4th Amendment - and the PRISM program is skating that line way too much.
It has been happening since medieval courts. And probably before that.
No it doesn't make it 'moral', but there is seriously nothing you can do about it. The only thing that will happen is it will go beyond the veil for another decade or two until the next whistleblower.
Pretty sure you don't know me.
The adult world is an evil place; the best we can do is keep our ears open - even if that means spying on allies. Countless lives have been saved because of our intelligence community doing things we probably wouldn't like knowing about. But the line that our government can never cross is the 4th Amendment - and the PRISM program is skating that line way too much. (EDIT: as far as I know)
Thanks Obama. Have fun knowing what shitty porn I enjoy.
I lol'd
If people can understand the concern over the suspicion that Huawei and ZTE give backdoors to Chinese hackers, and the government/business responses to those concerns, I don't know why people don't understand the concerns over the revelation that American companies are collaborating with American intelligence agencies in handing over data regarding foreigners, with no requirement for a court order.
The article talks about how these attacks are necessary because it classifies Germany as a "third-class" partner, and how Canada, Australia, Britain and New Zealand were explicitly exempted from spy attacks. And the EU government has said that American intelligence agencies have used spying to help American companies.I completely understand the concerns other have.
I also understand that it's not "American companies" only collaborating with American Intelligence agencies, it's also "German companies" and "German government" doing so. It's kinda the nature of sharing resources. Anger is a perfectly valid response to these allegations, just not the only one someone can have.
The adult world is a place where you realize you can't have big government to spy on other countries while having small government to protect your own. The one comes packaged with the other.
Countless lives have been saved? How many exactly? Which lives? I guess this is still in the name of the "war on terror" then? Good point, two year ago I saw Osama Bin Laden frolicking around in the Black Forest eating sauerkraut.
The article talks about how these attacks are necessary because it classifies Germany as a "third-class" partner, and how Canada, Australia, Britain and New Zealand were explicitly exempted from spy attacks. And the EU government has said that American intelligence agencies have used spying to help American companies.
Yes, governments spy on other governments, that's not really surprising. But I guess you can understand the anger in Berlin, for example why is Germany listed as an ally of third degree and is considered a target? Why is it being targeted at the same level as China or Saudi-Arabia? What has Germany exactly done to deserve that? Why are only anglosphere countries listed as allys that are not being spied upon?
My main concern is economic espionage. The USA has a history of stealing data from companies in Europe (Echelon) and gain competitive advantage. It's known that companies in the US and the intelligence services there have a close working realtionship. As I said before, they are going for our source of prosperity and I think that is a very legitimate reason to be angry.
And then there is the issue of PRISM and Tempora. Targeting governments is one thing, but those programs target everyone, private citizens, governments, everyone. And Germany has a bad history with citizens being spied upon. Again, a legitimate reason to be angered about. What do our intelligence services know and why didn't they protect us?
Apparently, you're only paying attention to the successful plots against us. I'm not here to be your personal Google, so if you have questions, look 'em up. Also, the only 'big government' I give a shit about is the one that is jerking off multinational corporations - the real kings of the world.
Spelling this out for you guys since it keeps getting glossed over:
US government spying on it's own citizens = very bad
US government spying on non-US citizens = so what
There's a difference between the first set of revelations a few weeks back and what this thread is about. Please quit treating the two like they're the same; it makes no sense.
Let me spell this out for you:
Not everyone thinks this.
I don't think this is being done with the best interests of the American public in mind. I think this is being done with the government's interests.
Enercon, Lernout & Hauspie, and Airbus come to mind.People keep making this jump to economic espionage. I haven't seen any examples of this happening yet. Do you have some?
Pretty sure you don't know me.
The adult world is an evil place; the best we can do is keep our ears open - even if that means spying on allies. Countless lives have been saved because of our intelligence community doing things we probably wouldn't like knowing about. But the line that our government can never cross is the 4th Amendment - and the PRISM program is skating that line way too much. (EDIT: as far as I know)
Enercon, Lernout & Hauspie, and Airbus come to mind.
But also look at Section 10.7 of the EU Parliament report, which lists a bunch of cases:
http://cryptome.org/echelon-ep-fin.htm#10
Ah, we're still dealing with the 90's. OK, I can understand why you would automatically assume that's what this is for. I disagree with the belief this is rooted in economic espionage. Was hoping for something more modern, but I won't try to change your mind.
What is it rooted in, then? I'm open to being convinced. What is special about Germany that puts it on the level of China and Saudi Arabia, with intelligence concentrated in industrial centers?
Yeah that would be kind of dumb... why did you just put those words in my mouth?I can pay attention to unsuccessful plots against the U.S. that make the light of day, I can't bloody well pay attention to the ones that are as good as made up can I?
Believing that terrorism is the number one threat to the world is the most naive thing I have ever heard.
Again, huh? How about you join the conversation I'm having with you instead of that strawman.Believing that those terrorist threats are coming from southern Germany is even more ridiculous.
That's right, I'm none of those things. Likewise, you're not paying me enough to write a report for you on why having a robust intelligence gathering community is a good thing.You are not my personal Google, and you are also not my personal psychic. You have to prove to me how dangerous terrorism is, how many terrorist training camps there are in Frankfurt, and then we can have a conversation.
Not my problemLet me spell this out for you:
Not everyone thinks this.
Still doesn't mean we throw the baby out with the bath water.I don't think this is being done with the best interests of the American public in mind. I think this is being done with the government's interests.
StrawmanSpying on EU diplomats/ corporations= saved lives
Cheney and Rumsfeld's hatred of the CIA (stemming from the Cold War) is what led to that administration ignoring the warnings about Bin Laden. The Boston bomber evidence wasn't ignored, there was a clerical error - a misspelling - which fucked that one up.Ignored clear evidence about 911 and Boston = saved lives
American corporations are doing great. You might mistake the nature of the US economy and employment with how corporations are doing. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is higher than its been this whole past 10 years, doing better than the DotCom era. NASDAQ Composite index is doing similarly well (10 year high, etc.).I couldn't tell you, my guess would be that most of the people we work with in Germany are concentrated there, and that's who you keep an eye on. Otherwise, don't you think American companies would be doing much better than they are?
Not my problem
Strawman
Yeah that would be kind of dumb... why did you just put those words in my mouth?
Again, huh? How about you join the conversation I'm having with you instead of that strawman.
That's right, I'm none of those things. Likewise, you're not paying me enough to write a report for you on why having a robust intelligence gathering community is a good thing.
American corporations are doing great. You might mistake the nature of the US economy and employment with how corporations are doing. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is higher than its been this whole past 10 years, doing better than the DotCom era. NASDAQ Composite index is doing similarly well (10 year high, etc.).
Your weak attemp of defending of shitting on freedom rights was it saves lives. Tell me about it, how did spying on diplomats and companies save lives?