This. It’s god damn annoying and deserves a spiderman.jpeg.There is when you’re trying to claim that the entirety of a broad demographic ‘people who play games’ happen to have you as their near one to one totem. Sorry bud.
The fact of the matter is that there are millions if not billions of ‘gamers’ all with different beliefs and values and certainly ones that do not believe ‘evil ideologies’ are being pushed. XD
I'm not sure, it's slightly strange behavior to want something to die when you can just ignore its existence. Unless it's a threat to you, or something you like. For example I can see not wanting microtransaction games in a franchise you like or some business model that is a threat to another one or whatever but wanting a company to die because of a product they made that you don't like, what does that gain you?Serious question, why would a consumer care if a company fails at all? Happens everyday in the world if you do not produce a product people want.
Sure I agree he could do with thicker skin but I'm sure you don't appreciate that hostile behaviour either. Especially if your existence doesn't cause anybody harm. I suspect you're in the armed forces so that's a little different to simply creating a product and trying to sell it and people being hostile towards you. Hating their existence is just weird. I haven't bought many Ubisoft products and I'm not interested in their work but I'd never cheer on them going under.Why would anyone care for the persons feelings at all? I care about his product, not him, his family, or even his dead grandma.
He can have all his feelings all he wants, but when you go against your core base, then you will run into people who will be straight up and say they do not want a company around that does that.
In my job, I’ve been spit on repeatedly, shot at on a daily basis, called a baby killer, had two teeth knocked out by folks who disagreed with me, blown up in a desert far away from home and I just smile and laugh. I volunteered for my job, just as they did.Go to work, make a good product. People will buy it or not and give their company crap or not. This caring about feelings of some corporation and its people is crazy town.
You don’t have to take responsibility for anything but your own actions, which includes wishing harm and hardship on anyone (if you are).Not my problems.
And to add in that he's now acted counter to the reason for his job... that's all on him.
I, we, won't take responsibility for his actions.
People who are truly pissed at gaming companies (and not a sideline gamer trolling for laughs) probably come from the fact past products were good and werent political. So when they get offered a new product that they dont like it pisses them off. Gaming is a unique industry because studios typically make one game at a time. So if it stinks, they hope 5 years later the next game improves which might not be true. Other industries, a tried and true product keeps selling, where any offshoot products are also made. And if those stink it's not a big deal because the classic product is still sold and enjoyed. Gaming is also different that you arent going to play the same game forever like buying milk and cheese. So gamers want the new product they like to keep going. Dont rock the boat too much please with the sequel.I'm not sure, it's slightly strange behavior to want something to die when you can just ignore its existence. Unless it's a threat to you, or something you like. For example I can see not wanting microtransaction games in a franchise you like or some business model that is a threat to another one or whatever but wanting a company to die because of a product they made that you don't like, what does that gain you?
Simply not buying the product is always an option. It's like me wishing Apple dies because they made the iphone. I have no interest in their product or their closed off ecosystem but I simply just ignore it. I don't call Apple scum that should die hoping people lose their jobs. If the product doesn't sell and they go bankrupt I would still be completely indifferent, I really wouldn't care, but wanting that to happen is just hatred.
Sure I agree he could do with thicker skin but I'm sure you don't appreciate that hostile behaviour either. Especially if your existence doesn't cause anybody harm. I suspect you're in the armed forces so that's a little different to simply creating a product and trying to sell it and people being hostile towards you. Hating their existence is just weird. I haven't bought many Ubisoft products and I'm not interested in their work but I'd never cheer on them going under.
I'm not sure, it's slightly strange behavior to want something to die when you can just ignore its existence. Unless it's a threat to you, or something you like. For example I can see not wanting microtransaction games in a franchise you like or some business model that is a threat to another one or whatever but wanting a company to die because of a product they made that you don't like, what does that gain you?
Simply not buying the product is always an option. It's like me wishing Apple dies because they made the iphone. I have no interest in their product or their closed off ecosystem but I simply just ignore it. I don't call Apple scum that should die hoping people lose their jobs. If the product doesn't sell and they go bankrupt I would still be completely indifferent, I really wouldn't care, but wanting that to happen is just hatred.
Sure I agree he could do with thicker skin but I'm sure you don't appreciate that hostile behaviour either. Especially if your existence doesn't cause anybody harm. I suspect you're in the armed forces so that's a little different to simply creating a product and trying to sell it and people being hostile towards you. Hating their existence is just weird. I haven't bought many Ubisoft products and I'm not interested in their work but I'd never cheer on them going under.
That UBI guy is on thin ice. Thats why he's pissed. The company is going down the toilet, with a possible last gasp of Chinese Tencent overtaking them.I personally just do not care if a company survives at all. People have opinions and with the invention of social media, everyone now has a chance for their opinion to be heard.
There are billions of gamers in the world and each one of them has an opinion, there are going to be people that have opinions that are going to hurt little feelings and it really doesn’t matter. Just a small amount of shitbirds can seem like a lot when there are billions of people in a hobby.
It could be as simple as people are tired of opening up games to see constant store fronts that want to take their money, the crazy developers that believe most people want to be a 500 pound woman that we can be by eating at McDonalds, etc.
Like I said as long as someone isn’t threatening someone with violence, then they can call that person a retard for life and nothing was lost.
I look at game developers the same I look at the guy who made my pants, my underwear, the fruit juice I drink, the toilet paper I use. I do not care about them or who they work for and it is always going to be that way.
He needs some serious thicker skin, stop acting like a swaddled baby, clean his face and make something I want to buy or they do not. Either way, it doesn’t affect me.
Bruh, you're almost as bad as him.You don’t have to take responsibility for anything but your own actions, which includes wishing harm and hardship on anyone (if you are).
Is I/we the they/them equivalent for the mob?
Tell your company to stop being racist.
Tell your company to stop being racist.
It's actually better to have a good "monetization director" who has experience and know his stuff. Because to make game earn money with a good faith from players is tricky and if it's a some novice random guy who are in charge of financial side you are much more likely to see predatory practices (as they are obvious "easy money" and require knowledge to understand their long-term detrimental impact) or financial failure of a game, both of them are bad.
Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag (2013)When was the last time Ubisoft made a good game?
Not sure what you’re struggling with here - I’m not saying you need to care, I’m saying it’s cunty to wish bad things on people. Just generally.Bruh, you're almost as bad as him.
We did literally nothing, yet apparently we bear a share of the responsibility. Fuuuuuuuck oooooofffffff.
People need to grow thicker skins. I don't care about the lives of the people who make most of what I buy and use, and in turn I'm fine with them not caring about my life. Authorities exist to do that caring, and my contribution and responsibility is and ends at voting and paying my taxes.
The counter argument to that by the typical video game employee will be like:What a piece of shit. You earn peoples money by selling a product they want, if you don’t deliver, you won’t earn their money. The entitlement is insane.
I hope this costs them even more sales, they just deserve to continue to crumble at this point.
Also SC Blacklist (2013 as well)Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag (2013)
I am not telling that this particular guy is seasoned professional. If he cry on internet over negatve customer feedback he has some issues.What makes you think he’s not a novice? Ubi Soft is one of the worst offenders when it comes to monetization. They tried pushing NFTs down our throats too.
You care about it a lot which is why you got triggered by my posts to begin with, so don't be ashamed now. You and many others don't like him and ubisoft because of ideologies. Even if they didn't disrespect the gamers by not putting out the statements that put them in bad light, you would have hated on them anyway, so who are you kidding? Oh, and gamers don't pay the bills of some company staff because they don't write their paycheck. Why not say you are giving them benefits and raises too, yeah? Who are you again? You can't be that naïve and self-entitled.I don't care about woke, non-woke in this particular case. Going against the people who pay your bills is a dumb mindset. Moreover, when the business success depends a lot on creating a community. Antagonizing and dividing the fandom achieves no good. People are not attacking identified devs, but the company as a whole. This dude entering the chat like an elephant in a convenience store is putting himself in the spotlight just for brownie points. You can't get dumber than that.
When someone treats gamers as "outsiders" it's crystal clear who doesn't belong in the gaming industry.
I'm stating facts, the only ones butthurt are you and your ilk. If certain games are underperforming or overperforming, it's because gamers are the ones who decide what to spend their money on, period. Investors like Blackrock can push companies to promote the message all they want, but if the companies want to make money they ultimately have to make a product gamers want to buy. If you can't understand that much, then maybe just stick to playing Dustborn.Keep crying more. It's a naïve and weak statement. The reality is that companies don't cater to gamers. Gamers don't draw the line on how the game is being made. There are many stakeholders influencing company decisions that can make or break a company far worse than some butthurt gamer complaining about ideologies..
Gamers spend money, but they don't decide on the salaries of developers nor do they help developers pay bills like some weirdos have others believe. There is no such thing as only pro-gamer. That's the reality.I'm stating facts, the only ones butthurt are you and your ilk. If certain games are underperforming or overperforming, it's because gamers are the ones who decide what to spend their money on, period. Investors like Blackrock can push companies to promote the message all they want, but if the companies want to make money they ultimately have to make a product gamers want to buy. If you can't understand that much, then maybe just stick to playing Dustborn.
Games that lose money doesn't magically pay CEOs their bonuses. As for developers, they will get paid when they make games people want to buy. Economics doesn't care about anything else but supply and demand.Gamers spend money, but they don't decide on the salaries of developers nor do they help developers pay bills like some weirdos have others believe. There is no such thing as only pro-gamer. That's the reality.
Ubisoft: "We're gonna delay our game to February so the negative sentiment towards us will blow over and won't harm our game sales as much"
Also Ubisoft, for some reason: "Gamers are non-decent human beings. Also FUCK them for not buying our games"
What is this strategy called?
Economics is just 1 element. There are also paid royalties from online stores and publishing, stocks, ad revenue, investment, data monetization, etc...Games that lose money doesn't magically pay CEOs their bonuses. As for developers, they will get paid when they make games people want to buy. Economics doesn't care about anything else but supply and demand.
Feel free to make games that scam people via malware, because that is what you are describing concerning studios making games with no paying customers.Economics is just 1 element. There are also paid royalties from online stores and publishing, stocks, ad revenue, investment, data monetization, etc...
Where is the part that says scam and no paying?Feel free to make games that scam people via malware, because that is what you are describing concerning studios making games with no paying customers.
You care about it a lot which is why you got triggered by my posts to begin with, so don't be ashamed now. You and many others don't like him and ubisoft because of ideologies. Even if they didn't disrespect the gamers by not putting out the statements that put them in bad light, you would have hated on them anyway, so who are you kidding? Oh, and gamers don't pay the bills of some company staff because they don't write their paycheck. Why not say you are giving them benefits and raises too, yeah? Who are you again? You can't be that naïve and self-entitled.
Sure you don't care when you were the one who brought up going against gamers paying their bills after getting triggered. Gamers don't dictate salaries, first of all. Secondly, are they really gamers or are they fake fans who only care about cultural wars?Dude, my last Assassins Creed game was Origins and I have loved Ubisoft this far, what are you even saying?
I stopped liking Ubisoft when they dropped their quality and took copypasta and social media warring as their new brand identity.
I don't know/care how much their staff makes per month, who they are or which are their beliefs. Nothing of that matters if games are good.
Ubisoft is in trouble not because people attack on them on social media, they are in trouble because gamers don't buy their games anymore. I personally have the same little importance as everyone else who was once a customer and now isn't.
Everyone pour one out for the monetisation director.
But it is merit based.Isn't this just cancel culture?
Are you saying that because people feel differently than you do their feelings are "wrong" and they ought not to have them? So now you feel it necessary to not leave them alone to feel the way they do, instead you need to correct them, thus wipe those types of feeling out of existence, and in effect you are doing exactly what you scold them for.I'm not sure, it's slightly strange behavior to want something to die when you can just ignore its existence. Unless it's a threat to you, or something you like. For example I can see not wanting microtransaction games in a franchise you like or some business model that is a threat to another one or whatever but wanting a company to die because of a product they made that you don't like, what does that gain you?
Simply not buying the product is always an option. It's like me wishing Apple dies because they made the iphone. I have no interest in their product or their closed off ecosystem but I simply just ignore it. I don't call Apple scum that should die hoping people lose their jobs. If the product doesn't sell and they go bankrupt I would still be completely indifferent, I really wouldn't care, but wanting that to happen is just hatred.
Sure I agree he could do with thicker skin but I'm sure you don't appreciate that hostile behaviour either. Especially if your existence doesn't cause anybody harm. I suspect you're in the armed forces so that's a little different to simply creating a product and trying to sell it and people being hostile towards you. Hating their existence is just weird. I haven't bought many Ubisoft products and I'm not interested in their work but I'd never cheer on them going under.
brought to you by the people who invented Cancel Culturewishing ill-fate to companies and people alike is sad