Comment section was completely gone just a few minutes ago, back now, but 0 comments.
They've wiped it clean due to too many negative comments?
They already acknowledged game-breaking lag...So was CoD the only AAA game that worked on release this year?
I think Destiny technically worked, it was just a massive disappointment.So was CoD the only AAA game that worked on release this year?
So was CoD the only AAA game that worked on release this year?
I won't buy a sub-30 fps 900p game on my PS4. It's 2014, my screen is 1080p and 1080p / 30 fps games are pretty standard now on PS4, buy some better devs.
If everybody can do it, you can do it too, Ubi.
I won't buy a sub-30 fps 900p game on my PS4. It's 2014, my screen is 1080p and 1080p / 30 fps games are pretty standard now on PS4, buy some better devs.
If everybody can do it, you can do it too, Ubi.
I can't believe I'm saying this but COD is the best AAA game this fall (that isn't a remaster)
For real. There's no way they didn't know that these issues were in the game. QA finds these bugs, especially when there are so many of them. They were deferred to ship the game on time, with plans to patch them later. That's just how it works. They've known about these issues for months.Its recognized as the damage limitation it is. They deserve no props for patching the game into a state it should have been in at launch. Thats not going "above and beyond", it's meeting the minimum threshold for what consumers expect in a game.
They want applause? Plaudits? How about dont release your game in beta state.
Maybe the comments fell through the floor...?
What comments section ?
link
I dont buy shit gae. If a game is 900p and hell of a fun, I buy it. If a game is 1080p@60fps and no fun, I won't buy it.
How can you appreciate the art style when there are models and textures popping in literally everywhere at ANY POINT, inducing visual monstrosity as well as animation glitches ?
How can you appreciate the gameplay, when it's running at 20 fps most the time ?
How can you have fun with your friends, when half the people are crippled with that outrageous "connection fail" error ? (check the ubi forums)
It IS a terrible game, as it stands, on console, ps4 for instance. The only thing it has, is potential.
The ps4 version is absolute insanity, as it currently is.
I'm playing on PS4. I'm not trying to hide the technical issues - it's pretty bad from that standpoint. Ubisoft deserves shit for releasing a game in this state, but I just can't get behind the hyperbole of people calling this game garbage when the game itself is super fun.
Graphical glitches are definitely there if you look for them but I don't notice them if I'm just running around doing missions. Even if I do see an NPC jump up or a texture flicker, who cares? It doesn't ruin my enjoyment of the game, I spend most of the time on rooftops anyways where you don't see all of the NPC pop-in nearly as badly.
Framerate is consistently in the 20's but if you played Dark Souls/2, The Last of Us, many other games on console late last gen this is nothing new, it looks choppy but it's not unplayable (then again, there are people on GAF who will claim 30FPS is unplayable so go figure). It just again doesn't ruin my enjoyment of the game.
It has clear technical issues, and bad ones at that. Underneath that all is a fantastic game though - and I would encourage any AC fans out there to pick up this game because it truly is the best in years - I also don't blame people who can't deal with the technical issues though. Hopefully they can get a patch out quickly that will fix these issues, and once they do, I honestly couldn't see a reason to not recommend this game to anyone.
TLDR: The game is truly bad on performance, Ubisoft deserves shit, underneath all the technical issues though this game is fantastic.
We forgive you, Ubi.
I like the comments on the blog supporting Ubisoft and thanking them for being so proactive. However, Ubisoft should be earning condemnation for releasing a game in such a state. Ah well, so many people with rose tinted PlayStation Lifestyle glasses.
They already acknowledged game-breaking lag...
![]()
I'm playing on PS4. I'm not trying to hide the technical issues - it's pretty bad from that standpoint. Ubisoft deserves shit for releasing a game in this state, but I just can't get behind the hyperbole of people calling this game garbage when the game itself is super fun.
Graphical glitches are definitely there if you look for them but I don't notice them if I'm just running around doing missions. Even if I do see an NPC jump up or a texture flicker, who cares? It doesn't ruin my enjoyment of the game, I spend most of the time on rooftops anyways where you don't see all of the NPC pop-in nearly as badly.
Framerate is consistently in the 20's but if you played Dark Souls/2, The Last of Us, many other games on console late last gen this is nothing new, it looks choppy but it's not unplayable (then again, there are people on GAF who will claim 30FPS is unplayable so go figure). It just again doesn't ruin my enjoyment of the game.
It has clear technical issues, and bad ones at that. Underneath that all is a fantastic game though - and I would encourage any AC fans out there to pick up this game because it truly is the best in years - I also don't blame people who can't deal with the technical issues though. Hopefully they can get a patch out quickly that will fix these issues, and once they do, I honestly couldn't see a reason to not recommend this game to anyone.
Yeah.... I'm gonna hold off on starting my copy until everything is fixed....
Man, I wish Schofield was the producer of every game. That dude has always been solid.
Do you not think there will be a new Assassin's Creed (or two) next year?
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.It may be buggy, but damn, it's impressive.
Just in random side walk:
http://a.pomf.se/akotso.webm
Needs like 6 weeks of patches for total polish but I reckon it should have gotten mostly 9-10s without these technical hickups (including polishing gameplay missions etc) (if it doesn't take a turn for the worst after some progress).
Really impressive stuff...on a good pc, it can hold up (so far). Watch Dogs also was mighty good (with the unofficial mods that just unlocked its potential).
I'm glad it got slammed for the technical issues but I'm glad Ubisoft is big enough to keep on pushing graphics and gameplay. Maybe they'll give the next games more optimization time.
But I got to give Ubisoft some love after all that hate on impressions.
I can understand people not being as forgiving when their $60 doesn't run satisfactorily smooth on their new console.
It may be buggy, but damn, it's impressive.
Just in random alley:
http://a.pomf.se/akotso.webm
Needs like 6 weeks of patches for total polish but I reckon it should have gotten mostly 9-10s without these technical hickups (including polishing gameplay missions etc) (if it doesn't take a turn for the worst after some progress).
Really impressive stuff...on a good pc, it can hold up (so far). Watch Dogs also was mighty good (with the unofficial mods that just unlocked its potential).
I'm glad it got slammed for the technical issues but I'm glad Ubisoft is big enough to keep on pushing graphics and gameplay. Maybe they'll give the next games more optimization time.
But I got to give Ubisoft some love after all that hate on impressions.
I can understand people not being as forgiving when their $60 doesn't run satisfactorily smooth on their new console.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
If agree with you btw. It looks great but plays like shit.
This thread is good:How do you make and embed HQ webm gifs?
What exactly am I supposed to be impressed by here? Much like Watch Dogs, it doesn't look anywhere near as good as the initial reveal.It may be buggy, but damn, it's impressive.
Just in random alley:
http://a.pomf.se/akotso.webm
Needs like 6 weeks of patches for total polish but I reckon it should have gotten mostly 9-10s without these technical hickups (including polishing gameplay missions etc) (if it doesn't take a turn for the worst after some progress).
Really impressive stuff...on a good pc, it can hold up (so far). Watch Dogs also was mighty good (with the unofficial mods that just unlocked its potential).
I'm glad it got slammed for the technical issues but I'm glad Ubisoft is big enough to keep on pushing graphics and gameplay. Maybe they'll give the next games more optimization time.
But I got to give Ubisoft some love after all that hate on impressions.
I can understand people not being as forgiving when their $60 doesn't run satisfactorily smooth on their new console.
While it's nice that they are keeping everyone in the loop while the game gets fixed, they are pretty much admitting that they don't know when the game will actually be finished in a salable state.
What exactly am I supposed to be impressed by here? Much like Watch Dogs, it doesn't look anywhere near as good as the initial reveal.
What exactly am I supposed to be impressed by here? Much like Watch Dogs, it doesn't look anywhere near as good as the initial reveal.
I sure do enjoy when a company lets consumers play full priceto beta test a game!plus optional microtransactions
Good news, everyone!
![]()
Good news, everyone!
![]()
Good news, everyone!
![]()