The fact you immediately drop into childish ‘you’re all gay’ insults clearly indicates you have no interest in engaging with the salient point.
‘She IS beautiful. You’re all homosexuals’ is not much of an argument when the discussion is about whether games developers should tailor their games to the core audience that will make it a success or not.
Either act like an adult and address the conversation topic, or go back to Reee and celebrate how clever you are with them.
Also, what characters look like and who they are very much do matter in narrative driven, third person action adventure games of the type Naughty Dog make. Super disingenuous to suggest otherwise.
Come on, I'm kidding because the subject is childish and pointless as fuck.
Since VG heroes exists some look cool, badass, some look stupid, some look realistic etc. I don't think that how the character of that game looks will affecet the sales a bit. Look TLOU2, the heroin is gay, doesn't look attractive at all, her gf look like a normal girl, etc and the game sold very well. In Souls games the characters (I talk about faces) look bad and the games sell very well...
While Stellar Blade sold well with its beautiful heroind, it didn't sell THAT well... 100% sure Intergalactic will sell A LOT better.
I think that what can sell bad is bad character design, for exemple in Concord the characters looked like shit, not that they are not well rendered in 3D but... They are ugly at the point they are painful to watch. For exemple in Valorant the characters look good for what they are, but in Concord... It's about a lack of talent.
I think that the character of Intargalactic looks badass, she reminds me Ripley in Alien 3, she is imo well designed, you can think she's attractive or not it's not the point but, "for what she is", she is well designed.
I'm joking (badly) on this thread because I think it's pathetic to debate about such pointless topic... It's so immature.