Napoleonthechimp
Member
Charnwood here. There's nothing but bigots and idiots here... in other words it's a conservative stronghold with leanings toward the BNP.
Dabookerman said:Of course I do.. What meaning do you derive from it?
scotcheggz pretty much sums up what my meaning is.
defel1111 said:You'd think that all Tory MPs are fire-breathing dragons with Satan on speed-dial...
Wes said:Personally I would never tactically vote. I can understand why people consider it, it's just not an idea I subscribe to. I want to vote for the party whose policies I like/adhere to the most, no matter their chances.
Ghost said:It's pretty simple from my point of view, I live in a key labour-tory marginal, and I really don't want a Tory government, so I'll vote to stop that happening.
Napoleonthechimp said:Charnwood here. There's nothing but bigots and idiots here... in other words it's a conservative stronghold with leanings toward the BNP.
took them long enoughEmpty said:the guardian endorses the lib dems.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/30/the-liberal-moment-has-come
Meadows said:GB said he wouldn't work with the Lib Dems (personally, not the party).
YouGov have been very open, saying that means they tend to include more prosperous voters, more broadsheet readers, older voters, to be slightly more Conservative and sometimes more male-dominated than the voting population as a whole. ComRes doesnt weight to viewers but to the voting population profile.
Look at how the ComRes poll sample for last night worked. They polled people who expressed their voting preference as 35 per cent Con, 24 per cent Lab and 36 per cent Lib Dem. And heres how those same people voted on the instant poll on who performed best in the debate: 35 per cent Cameron, 26 per cent Brown and 33 per cent Clegg. As Michael Howards posters used to say in 2005, Are you thinking what Im thinking?
Really, that should be Gordon Browns slogan: He kept us out of the euro. And thats the saving grace of the situation.
Napoleonthechimp said:The thing that really turns me against the tories is Murdoch's support with the caveat that Cameron dismantles the BBC. Fuckers.
Oh wait... upon further investigation the accusations have come from the spin doctor extraordinaire Lord Mandelson. However... the Murdoch empire hates the BBC and IS in league with the Conservatives.curls said:How accurate is this? I just think if this was true then I would have heard of it outside of this thread.
I really hope this isn't true
news at 11 : Paul Krugman says something negative about Europe/Euro :loldefel1111 said:Interesting article by Krugman in the NYTimes about Britain and the Euro:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/why-isnt-britain-in-more-trouble/
Napoleonthechimp said:Oh wait... upon further investigation the accusations have come from the spin doctor extraordinaire Lord Mandelson. However... the Murdoch empire hates the BBC and IS in league with the Conservatives.
Napoleonthechimp said:Oh wait... upon further investigation the accusations have come from the spin doctor extraordinaire Lord Mandelson. However... the Murdoch empire hates the BBC and IS in league with the Conservatives.
He's an idiot then. The situation here would be improved with the Euro.defel1111 said:Interesting article by Krugman in the NYTimes about Britain and the Euro:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/why-isnt-britain-in-more-trouble/
He's never said a truer word.Gordon Brown said:I couldn't persuade anyone.
That's one of the sucky things about being way down in the polls, you have to maintain public denial no matter how obvious your imminent loss is. I still remember John Major doing a Comical Ali act right up to the last minute when it was obvious he was leading his party to utter demolition.scotcheggz said:Just watched the Paxman/Brown interview on the iPlayer. Brown came across really well I thought, he dealt with paxman like a pro. I dunno how he kept a straight face though when he said he is still gunning for a labour majority.
Did he just call Morrisons shit? Because that's just wrong.Chinner said:Good Charlie Brooker article:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/29/tv-debate-songs-of-praise-charlie-brooker
Huh? He clearly said that they wouldn't be raising it. In fact, out of the three leaders he's gave the clearest answer.Watching the Paxman interview on the iPlayer, Brown did not want to give an answer on VAT.
louis89 said:Brown looks so good on Paxman. How come he's normally so useless looking and sounding, and yet here he actually looks like someone who can compete with Cameron and Clegg?
Chinner said:Papers supporting Conservatives:
The Economist
CRD90 said:Morrisons > Asda > Tesco > Sainsburys (Waitrose isn't a real supermarket, just a place to spend too much on your food).
Chinner said:Interesting article about polls:
http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2010/04/30/what-the-post-debate-reaction-polls-tell-us/
CRD90 said:Did he just call Morrisons shit? Because that's just wrong.
Morrisons > Asda > Tesco > Sainsburys (Waitrose isn't a real supermarket, just a place to spend too much on your food).
Huh? He clearly said that they wouldn't be raising it. In fact, out of the three leaders he's gave the clearest answer.
CRD90 said:Huh? He clearly said that they wouldn't be raising it. In fact, out of the three leaders he's gave the clearest answer.
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=16007299&source=hptextfeatureTim the Wiz said:I am disappoint.
CRD90 said:Did he just call Morrisons shit? Because that's just wrong.
Morrisons > Asda > Tesco > Sainsburys (Waitrose isn't a real supermarket, just a place to spend too much on your food).