morningbus
Serious Sam is a wicked gahbidge series for chowdaheads.
I'm convinced this is just another brilliant performance by Joaquin Phoenix.
There are whispers of civil war.It's not even the rhetoric, it's the editing and music. It makes it sound like Bane, the Decepticons, and whoever we're shooting this year in Call of Duty are teaming up to blow up the world.
The other issue is that Democrats are, honestly, more about fiscal responsibility if you look at the past few decades compared to the GOP. Seriously, that's not some rah rah I love my part hyperbole, the GOP sucks at looking at what the long term outcomes of their decisions are. Honestly, there's just not a good reason to vote for those people. At all. Nothing they say makes sense, no matter what way you cut it. Fuck me, Obama is a fiscal president if you compare him debt wise to Bush!
I believe what we'll see is the Dem party actually split into two new parties over the years. One fiscal, one more socialist with less focus on social issues. As the baby boomers get older and middle class/young voters age with more left leanings, the GOP is just not going to have any relevance.
I agree with this I don't see much political future for the GOP like 40 years from now. The united states is becoming more left leaning not less there is no denying that and there is no room for that in the GOP. As you said the only thing that is left is for Democratic party to split into a conservative and more liberal faction.
The funniest/saddest thing is that those eagles never even agreed to be in someone's propaganda video. He's being portrayed as some sort of harbinger of freedom, but really he's just an everyman type of bird who goes out and picks carcasses just like everyone else. The bald eagle is sort of like an unwitting Joe the Plumber.lol. so much fear mongering. I don't get it.
What liberal advances are people are afraid of.
The fast eagle cuts at the end, haha.
I agree with this.
IMO, fiscal conservatism still has a place at the table in the country, but its the rest of this shit....It just makes it too hard to vote Republican.
So...how are the Republicans more fiscally conservative? By my count they're less so, what with less taxes across the board (really only the top margins), more (not less loopholes for havens and investments abroad), more military spending and all the rest.
So...how are the Republicans more fiscally conservative? By my count they're less so, what with less taxes across the board (really only the top margins), more (not less loopholes for havens and investments abroad), more military spending and all the rest.
So stop. Seriously, the Republican party isn't a fiscal conservative party, and the sooner people just stop voting for them the sooner they will drop their base and recreate themselves or the democrats will split in two.
Yes the democrats do elect some liberal people, but I think by and large they tend to elect mostly pretty close to centrists, especially for a national office like the presidency.
Do you think I voted Republican this go around?
Lets not go crazy here guys. There is plenty of ammo to after the Republicans on the budget, but the Democrats are not better. Demagoguing anyone who raises the possibility of entitlement reform, when that is obviously the driver of deficits,is not helpful. Same for public employee unions that are causing cities to go broke.
The balanced budgets of the 90s were the product of bipartisanship from the Bush 1 and Clinton years when each party controlled one branch of government.
If you didn't, then good.
Hopefully more stop. I really want to go back to having two real solutions to real problems, not one decent solution to a real problem and a bunch of nutcases denying there's ever been a problem.
Lets not go crazy here guys. There is plenty of ammo to after the Republicans on the budget, but the Democrats are not better. Demagoguing anyone who raises the possibility of entitlement reform, when that is obviously the driver of deficits,is not helpful. Same for public employee unions that are causing cities to go broke.
The balanced budgets of the 90s were the product of bipartisanship from the Bush 1 and Clinton years when each party controlled one branch of government.
Cut the military budget and raise taxes. And other stuff, too, obviously.
http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/the-slut-vote.htmlThe famous “gender gap” isn’t really a gap based on gender. The right overwhelmingly wins older and married women. The “gender gap” should more accurately be called the slut vote.
Women make up about 54% of the electorate. It is very hard to win without winning that segment, or at least losing it only narrowly while winning men big. While the right usually wins married women, the fact is that married women constitute an ever-decreasing share of the female population. Women want to delay marriage as long as possible so they can “have it all,” and usually “have it all” means “have as much hot alpha sex as possible without any consequences.” And thus, less married women and more sluts (not that these two groups are mutually exclusive, per se)
It was better in the original German.
Probably old, but there is no such thing as gender gap apparently:
http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/the-slut-vote.html
Drop in the bucket against the horde of aging fat people who enjoyed decades of high growth, low taxes, and contraception.Cut the military budget and raise taxes. And other stuff, too, obviously.
So...how are the Republicans more fiscally conservative?
Probably old, but there is no such thing as gender gap apparently:
(slut gap)
http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/the-slut-vote.html
there is a war in america ?
after reading much of the meltdown thread, Civil war threats are maybe just a tad less ludicrous than I believed
And the market falls 60 points just as we were up as he doesn't sound willing to compromise. Sigh.He speaks.
The president is speaking on National TV right now. Good speech, basically he wants to work on this with everyone on working on the budget before the end of the year.
He classifies himself in the "rich", and doesn't want to let the rich have no tax increase while the general public has a tax hike. Good speech imo.
I didn't say they were. I said I wished the Dems were more fiscally conservative. I don't like paying for stuff that we can't afford and just adding it to the debt. I don't do it in my own life and I don't believe our country should continue to do it.
He speaks.
The president is speaking on National TV right now. Good speech, basically he wants to work on this with everyone on working on the budget before the end of the year.
He classifies himself in the "rich", and doesn't want to let the rich have no tax increase while the general public has a tax hike. Good speech imo.
The difference being that Romney would have been scrutinized for these things. Obama will brush of any criticism with his great PR/by being a democrat.
Speaking of Joe the plumber. I was kinda bummed out Romney did not have his own version this cycle. The GOP always seems to find one to carry the mantle.Michael A. Needham.
Needs ham.
The funniest/saddest thing is that those eagles never even agreed to be in someone's propaganda video. He's being portrayed as some sort of harbinger of freedom, but really he's just an everyman type of bird who goes out and picks carcasses just like everyone else. The bald eagle is sort of like an unwitting Joe the Plumber.
"Over the last four years the Conservative movement has grown stronger."
Uh...didn't the events of this last week prove that to be very wrong?
I didn't say they were. I said I wished the Dems were more fiscally conservative. I don't like paying for stuff that we can't afford and just adding it to the debt. I don't do it in my own life and I don't believe our country should continue to do it.
I'm usually a giant asshole on this subject so I'm just going to link to this 6 minute video that explains why this line is...horrifically misguided.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ugDU2qNcyg
I'm usually a giant asshole on this subject so I'm just going to link to this 6 minute video that explains why this line is...horrifically misguided.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ugDU2qNcyg
Really? Who carried their mantle in 2004? Or 2000? Or 1996? Or 1992?Speaking of Joe the plumber. I was kinda bummed out Romney did not have his own version this cycle. The GOP always seems to find one to carry the mantle.
I'm usually a giant asshole on this subject so I'm just going to link to this 6 minute video that explains why this line is...horrifically misguided.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ugDU2qNcyg