• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

United States Election: Nov 6, 2012 |OT| - Barack Obama Re-elected

Status
Not open for further replies.

ISOM

Member
The other issue is that Democrats are, honestly, more about fiscal responsibility if you look at the past few decades compared to the GOP. Seriously, that's not some rah rah I love my part hyperbole, the GOP sucks at looking at what the long term outcomes of their decisions are. Honestly, there's just not a good reason to vote for those people. At all. Nothing they say makes sense, no matter what way you cut it. Fuck me, Obama is a fiscal president if you compare him debt wise to Bush!

I believe what we'll see is the Dem party actually split into two new parties over the years. One fiscal, one more socialist with less focus on social issues. As the baby boomers get older and middle class/young voters age with more left leanings, the GOP is just not going to have any relevance.

I agree with this I don't see much political future for the GOP like 40 years from now. The united states is becoming more left leaning not less there is no denying that and there is no room for that in the GOP. As you said the only solution that is left is for Democratic party to split into a conservative and more liberal faction.
 

Tex117

Banned
I agree with this I don't see much political future for the GOP like 40 years from now. The united states is becoming more left leaning not less there is no denying that and there is no room for that in the GOP. As you said the only thing that is left is for Democratic party to split into a conservative and more liberal faction.

Little too early for this type of prediction.

The mantle of true fiscal conservatism is still up for grabs. If the Republicans can capture that, while dropping the social agenda...it will be a different ball game.
 

Michael A. Needham.

Needs ham.

lol. so much fear mongering. I don't get it.

What liberal advances are people are afraid of.

The fast eagle cuts at the end, haha.
The funniest/saddest thing is that those eagles never even agreed to be in someone's propaganda video. He's being portrayed as some sort of harbinger of freedom, but really he's just an everyman type of bird who goes out and picks carcasses just like everyone else. The bald eagle is sort of like an unwitting Joe the Plumber.
 

akira28

Member
Just more hidden messages for the next Jared Laughtner, unfortunately. You can't call to battle and then wash your hands of it when people show up at the shopping mall with their right to bear arms and willingness to defend their Constitutions from wimps and pussies and people who don't love America as much as they do.
 

RDreamer

Member
I agree with this.

IMO, fiscal conservatism still has a place at the table in the country, but its the rest of this shit....It just makes it too hard to vote Republican.

So stop. Seriously, the Republican party isn't a fiscal conservative party, and the sooner people just stop voting for them the sooner they will drop their base and recreate themselves or the democrats will split in two.

Yes the democrats do elect some liberal people, but I think by and large they tend to elect mostly pretty close to centrists, especially for a national office like the presidency.
 

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
So...how are the Republicans more fiscally conservative? By my count they're less so, what with less taxes across the board (really only the top margins), more (not less loopholes for havens and investments abroad), more military spending and all the rest.

The George W. Bush Republican party was not fiscally conservative at all. But have you read the Ryan budget? Or more probably, have you read the horrified reactions to it from the New York Times?
 

teh_pwn

"Saturated fat causes heart disease as much as Brawndo is what plants crave."
So...how are the Republicans more fiscally conservative? By my count they're less so, what with less taxes across the board (really only the top margins), more (not less loopholes for havens and investments abroad), more military spending and all the rest.

It's the biggest misconception of modern American politics. The Republicans are strong fiscal liberals. The Democrats are fiscal moderates. The only fiscally conservative party in theory is the Libertarian party, and the only recent President in practice was Bill Clinton. Obama may be a repeat.
 

Tex117

Banned
So stop. Seriously, the Republican party isn't a fiscal conservative party, and the sooner people just stop voting for them the sooner they will drop their base and recreate themselves or the democrats will split in two.

Yes the democrats do elect some liberal people, but I think by and large they tend to elect mostly pretty close to centrists, especially for a national office like the presidency.

Do you think I voted Republican this go around?
 

RDreamer

Member
Do you think I voted Republican this go around?

If you didn't, then good. :p

Hopefully more stop. I really want to go back to having two real solutions to real problems, not one decent solution to a real problem and a bunch of nutcases denying there's ever been a problem.
 

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
Lets not go crazy here guys. There is plenty of ammo to after the Republicans on the budget, but the Democrats are not better. Demagoguing anyone who raises the possibility of entitlement reform, when that is obviously the driver of deficits,is not helpful. Same for public employee unions that are causing cities to go broke.

The balanced budgets of the 90s were the product of bipartisanship from the Bush 1 and Clinton years when each party controlled one branch of government.
 
684881893.gif
 
Lets not go crazy here guys. There is plenty of ammo to after the Republicans on the budget, but the Democrats are not better. Demagoguing anyone who raises the possibility of entitlement reform, when that is obviously the driver of deficits,is not helpful. Same for public employee unions that are causing cities to go broke.

The balanced budgets of the 90s were the product of bipartisanship from the Bush 1 and Clinton years when each party controlled one branch of government.

Cut the military budget and raise taxes. And other stuff, too, obviously.
 

Tex117

Banned
If you didn't, then good. :p

Hopefully more stop. I really want to go back to having two real solutions to real problems, not one decent solution to a real problem and a bunch of nutcases denying there's ever been a problem.

I hope, seriously, my hope is that the Republicans actually read the writing on the wall. They were given a GOLDEN opportunity. They can either take a look at what happened, re-invent themselves as true fiscal conservatives, drop the social agenda, and sell their soul to win the latino vote, or they can fruther slide into obsecurity.

Fiscal conservatism plays. It is a real issue. It is a real concern facing this country, but that needs to be the ONLY platform for the Republicans. Not this moral crusade bs. Promote family values? Sure. Actively pass legislation against gays? No way...stop that sheet. Support Abortion? At least admit that health of the mother, rape and incest is allowed and supported. (Though I wish they would take an even more liberal approach, but thats dreamin').

Who knows...but I hope anyway.

Lets not go crazy here guys. There is plenty of ammo to after the Republicans on the budget, but the Democrats are not better. Demagoguing anyone who raises the possibility of entitlement reform, when that is obviously the driver of deficits,is not helpful. Same for public employee unions that are causing cities to go broke.

The balanced budgets of the 90s were the product of bipartisanship from the Bush 1 and Clinton years when each party controlled one branch of government.

You get the hell out of here with a reasonable post.
(Im joking).

Cut the military budget and raise taxes. And other stuff, too, obviously.

Alot more man. Alot.

Here is what needs to be on the table.
(1) Let taxes raise some.
(2) Reform the tax code to offset a straight up percentage hike (limit some loopholes)
(3) Make cuts to Defense
(4) Raise social security age.
(5) Reform entitlement programs to accurately reflect the changing economic landscape of the US. (Not throw people off).

All these things...every one. MUST be on the table.

I hope the Democrats and the Republicans can finally, at long last accomplish this. If they do? Then Obama (if he takes some leadership in this), will be a hero!
 

elty

Member
Probably old, but there is no such thing as gender gap apparently:

The famous “gender gap” isn’t really a gap based on gender. The right overwhelmingly wins older and married women. The “gender gap” should more accurately be called the slut vote.

Women make up about 54% of the electorate. It is very hard to win without winning that segment, or at least losing it only narrowly while winning men big. While the right usually wins married women, the fact is that married women constitute an ever-decreasing share of the female population. Women want to delay marriage as long as possible so they can “have it all,” and usually “have it all” means “have as much hot alpha sex as possible without any consequences.” And thus, less married women and more sluts (not that these two groups are mutually exclusive, per se)
http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/the-slut-vote.html
 
He speaks.

The president is speaking on National TV right now. Good speech, basically he wants to work on this with everyone on working on the budget before the end of the year.

He classifies himself in the "rich", and doesn't want to let the rich have no tax increase while the general public has a tax hike. Good speech imo.
 

Phreaker

Member
So...how are the Republicans more fiscally conservative?

I didn't say they were. I said I wished the Dems were more fiscally conservative. I don't like paying for stuff that we can't afford and just adding it to the debt. I don't do it in my own life and I don't believe our country should continue to do it.
 

commedieu

Banned
after reading much of the meltdown thread, Civil war threats are maybe just a tad less ludicrous than I believed

RIGHHT???

Like people are salty as shit, buying up weapons and ammo. I mean facebook is merely a reflection of a mindset. Think about the back woods people who haven't had 4 years to figure out the computer.

They must be building their shelters right now.
 
He speaks.

The president is speaking on National TV right now. Good speech, basically he wants to work on this with everyone on working on the budget before the end of the year.

He classifies himself in the "rich", and doesn't want to let the rich have no tax increase while the general public has a tax hike. Good speech imo.
And the market falls 60 points just as we were up as he doesn't sound willing to compromise. Sigh.
 

RDreamer

Member
I didn't say they were. I said I wished the Dems were more fiscally conservative. I don't like paying for stuff that we can't afford and just adding it to the debt. I don't do it in my own life and I don't believe our country should continue to do it.

The conceptual difference between your budget and a government with a fiat monetary system is astounding. You can't compare the two.

Also, if the dems were more 'fiscally conservative' as you seem to want we'd be in more of a recession right now. Look what happened in Europe. They crashed then adopted austerity and went down again. That doesn't work. If anything Obama and the dems have not spent enough at this time. You absolutely cannot compare governmental spending during a recession, when it NEEDS to be high to spending at other times and flatly say the dems aren't fiscally conservative. In fact, spending went up the slowest it has in decades. That is being fiscally conservative. And, during a time of success the dems started on the track of paying down the debt. Again, that's fiscally conservative.

You already got your wish. The democrats since Reagan have absolutely been to the center or center-right on these issues.
 
The difference being that Romney would have been scrutinized for these things. Obama will brush of any criticism with his great PR/by being a democrat.

I fear you may be right.

Obama is in the position to betray his liberal supporters in a royal fashion with his Grand Bargain. To put the burden on the military industrial complex or the middle class? I hope he chooses correctly, but I don't expect him to. I don't expect to have many rational discussions on the Grand Bargain for another couple weeks. Forum's still high on Hopium.
 

DarkFlow

Banned
Michael A. Needham.

Needs ham.


The funniest/saddest thing is that those eagles never even agreed to be in someone's propaganda video. He's being portrayed as some sort of harbinger of freedom, but really he's just an everyman type of bird who goes out and picks carcasses just like everyone else. The bald eagle is sort of like an unwitting Joe the Plumber.
Speaking of Joe the plumber. I was kinda bummed out Romney did not have his own version this cycle. The GOP always seems to find one to carry the mantle.
 

3phemeral

Member
Seems the Republican party went from manipulating the "king making" Evangelicals to becoming them. As much as I want to believe that the further right they go, the more irrelevant they become, I'm afraid of how bad it might get for those who are stuck in the super red states.

Really can't see them reforming. In fact, at this point, it seems more likely that a new party will sweep them over.
 

dabig2

Member
I didn't say they were. I said I wished the Dems were more fiscally conservative. I don't like paying for stuff that we can't afford and just adding it to the debt. I don't do it in my own life and I don't believe our country should continue to do it.

I'm usually a giant asshole on this subject so I'm just going to link to this 6 minute video that explains why this line is...horrifically misguided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ugDU2qNcyg
 

mbmonk

Member
I'm usually a giant asshole on this subject so I'm just going to link to this 6 minute video that explains why this line is...horrifically misguided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ugDU2qNcyg

So a question about that video. Early in the video he states Social Security bought US bonds and thus we just owe ourselves.

But I thought the general critique of Soc Sec was that it was funded, but that money was spent on non Soc Sec related items. So we have the liability of paying Soc Sec, but we have already spent the funds that were reserved to pay for it. So yes we owe ourselves the money, but we are going to have to fund it out of the future income ( lack of a better word ) instead of just pulling it out of Soc Sec trusts ( ... I think they are trusts.. ).

I apologize if I am grossly incorrect.

Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom