Saw this on reddit...fairly relevant I think regarding D&D's lack of subtlety and such.
Not to mention it's not as though book readers were devastated by that scene, because basically anyone with half a brain could guess that he's not gone for good. Why should nonreaders be devastated by it either?
What's great about the series (books and show) is the overall plotting and worldbuilding and the memorable characters, IMO, not the huge shocker moments.
It's hard to tell if I'm comparing the show to the books constantly and if it's no good since book->screen adaptations hardly ever are...
or if the show is just becoming bad now that they're deviating so far into original content instead of adapting content.
Saw this on reddit...fairly relevant I think regarding D&D's lack of subtlety and such.
It's hard to tell if I'm comparing the show to the books constantly and if it's no good since book->screen adaptations hardly ever are...
or if the show is just becoming bad now that they're deviating so far into original content instead of adapting content.
Diverging from the books isn't inherently a bad thing. It's just that the writers of the show are average at best so the stuff they come up with tends to not be very good.
Saw this on reddit...fairly relevant I think regarding D&D's lack of subtlety and such.
They're very good at adapting GRRM's words so that they sound like things an actual person would say, I'll give them that.
thats super odd, because the scene where she hid needle definitely did not look like it was a tool for revenge but a thing to remember the good old times.
but still, we all know she will stab bad people with it, does she still have needle in the books?
Uh...
D&D's problem is not that they're stupid. They're very smart guys who have thoroughly read the books. They just think they know better than GRRM.
I'm saying that in the events that they use dialogue straight from the books, it's adapted to be true to the show and doesn't sound like it's being read directly from the books.
It doesn't?
D&D's problem is not that they're stupid. They're very smart guys who have thoroughly read the books. They just think they know how to adapt the story to be more enjoyable for a TV audience.
Given Martins tv background, do you guys think he would have been able to make the similar and necessary, MASSIVE cuts to his books, say if they started the show after the last book released and Martin got to do a lot more of the writing for the show. It would be really interesting to see what he personally feels is expendable.
Given Martins tv background, do you guys think he would have been able to make the similar and necessary, MASSIVE cuts to his books, say if they started the show after the last book released and Martin got to do a lot more of the writing for the show. It would be really interesting to see what he personally feels is expendable.
D&D's problem is not that they're stupid. They're very smart guys who have thoroughly read the books. They just think they know better than GRRM.
As with most things, it depends on how important it is (or I guess even if it happens at all lol).So Sandor is actually dead right ? That means no cleganebowl ? Is it gonna be Loras vs Zombie Clegane then ?
That Nolan direction.As soon as Jon's eyes turn white there will be a wildling yell "HE'S WARGING!" Black screen, end of season.
Killed by Varys of course, he can have a jetpack too.So how willdie?kaven and maester pycell
D&D's problem is not that they're stupid. They're very smart guys who have thoroughly read the books. They just think they know better than GRRM.
I have the impression success got the better of them and now they ride an unstoppable train.
LSH also represented an arc for Jaime which is orders of magnitude better than the festering turd which has been Dorne this season.Lett's keep in mind that last two seasons were great. They do have to adapt the weakest book this season while not having the luxury of just ignoring certain characters for a book like GRRM did.
I do think that cutting LSH was a mistake. Because it represented a hope for revenge that book readers had to look forward to but show watchers don't. In that way, also the Northern plot/Faegon cut is affecting this season. Keeping Vary's plan with faegon would have added a more sense of urgency. But yea, budget issues I am sure factored into some of these decisions.
Well, obviously it's his story. For better or worse, the other writers are chained to the events he created. Also, GURM got the benefit of writing the episodes for the best plot points in the story , i.e. Black water.I don't mean dialogue at all. The show has created great character moments, but the bits of the story that move things forward, the scenes that wow you, until now are all George's. Now the show needs to do them and it's failing.
Hound's death was never shown, just implied. But it doesn't look like they plan to bring him back. Let's see.
Cersei names ZombieGregor her champion, the Faith summons The Nameless Inquisitor. Book it. PPV. Two Dead Men. One Lives. One Dies Again. One Night Only.
No, there he is just abbreviating what GRRM said in less than half the words.
Interesting hypothetical. Would he care though? I thought one of the driving forces for writing the books was that it couldn't be properly depicted on TV.Given Martins tv background, do you guys think he would have been able to make the similar and necessary, MASSIVE cuts to his books, say if they started the show after the last book released and Martin got to do a lot more of the writing for the show. It would be really interesting to see what he personally feels is expendable.
Honestly, when I heard him say he wanted AFFC and ADWD to be at least a season each, I figured it was just so that he'd have more time to finish the books.that's a very good question. I think he said he wanted three seasons for AFFC/ADWD, so I don't think he woudl have cut away a lot, but then again he said that in a context where he discussed that D&D could wait for him to finish the books. but as the original writer he certainly would not have made the same decisions D&D did, season 1 would probably have been more or less the same.
Saw this on reddit...fairly relevant I think regarding D&D's lack of subtlety and such.
I don't see any issue with this.
It's a quick and dirty summation of GRRM's words.
I think the best moments from the writers of this show happen as they are transformed from characters giving speeches to flesh-and-blood human beings.
The first problem with adapting the books is depicted in its best art. It looks and sounds like a series of (very dark) fantasy books. We sit and talk about how this or that didn't live up to how George described it, but the events of the show do fit the adult flesh-and-blood men and women who are inhabited by these actors.
It's how you get from this
to
Revenge in and of itself is related to her family. It's revenge for her family, against those who have killed and mistreated them. I'm sure if the two minute video his quote came from was longer he could have expanded on things more. And we all know the real reason that specific quote was used is because she's soon going to take revenge by killing Meryn Trant.?? It's completely different. She can't bring herself to leave Needle because it represents everything that she loves, not because it's a killing machine.
If nothing else, the show has allowed me to believe that we don't need to see Sansa screwing around in the Vale for 200 pages. As long as that arc ends with her or LF nominally in control of the Vale knights, what is the difference?They also had her die her hair for...6 episodes? I frankly don't believe they knew where they were taking Sansa in Season 4/5.
I really liked the theory that Sansa would have to kill Robert to position Harry as the Lord of the Vale. Show her desperation and desire to reclaim her land and the lengths that she would go to do so.
Although as much as I want that to happen in the books, the show had better not take her back to the Vale.