Lol show-watcher conspiracy theories are about to get as dumb as book reader conspiracy theories huh.
When you don't take it seriously it's pretty funny though.Yeah. I mean it seems like the books and series are so distinct at this point though. Just ban anyone who pulls a #nooneunderstands lol that'll make both threads better.
I'm not sure that's even possible. Nothing will ever match Donal Noye eating his own arm.
Good point, there's very little fall damage in this series. Unless you are Bran.I dunno, I think Miranda might still be alright.
I put more faith in D&D dancing around a subject than I do in whatever intern updates that website.They did, however, give Stannis' page on the official site an update claiming that Brienne killed him.
When you don't take it seriously it's pretty funny though.
Why on earth would Davos do that? Because he has nothing else to do?Jon Azor Ahai Snow's new advisor.
Yeah. I mean it seems like the books and series are so distinct at this point though. Just ban anyone who pulls a #nooneunderstands lol that'll make both threads better.
Why on earth would Davos do that? Because he has nothing else to do?
From a really popular Youtube theorizer...
...tell me that isn't a real thing that people have genuinely, actually, said.
In the book they're interrupted by a guy named Donal Noye. Noye used to work for House Baratheon and lost his arm in the siege of Storm's End. The character is a big riddle because you have to ask yourself why would someone lose an arm in a siege. Later from Davos and Stannis we find out everyone was starving during the siege so we can kind of piece everything together: It seems Donal ate his arm and was sent to the Wall for his crime.
I put more faith in D&D dancing around a subject than I do in whatever intern updates that website.
The character is a big riddle because you have to ask yourself why would someone lose an arm in a siege.
My problem with this alleged scoop is that I don't know where Rose Leslie lives and if the answer isn't "Belfast" then unless Ygritte's alive again it just feels like an ill-conceived jest.
But then, the reddit thread has someone mentioning that's a legit place in Belfast that the cast and crew are known to frequent.
But then, that someone in the thread could be the origin of the lie or something.
Lots of questions. Not a lot of hard proof for faith.
“In a book, you can present that kind of ambiguity,” Weiss said. “In a show, everybody sees it for what it is. It’s that rule: ‘If don’t see the body then they’re not really dead.’ Like when we cut Ned’s head off, we didn’t want a gory Monty Python geyser of blood, but we needed to see the blade enter his neck and cut out on the frame where the blade was mid-neck—it was longest discussion ever of where to cut a frame; two hours of talking about whether to cut at frame six or frame seven or frame eight. And that’s all by way of saying we needed Ned’s death to be totally unambiguous. I remember reading the book and going back and forth, like, ‘Did I miss something? Was [Ned] swapped out for somebody else?’ There’s a level of ambiguity because you’re not seeing something starkly represented. In the book, you can write around things to preserve a certain level of mystery that you have to commit to on screen.”
I love how about 5000 screaming Dothraki sneak up on you in an open field.
Hmm. I think I'll watch. I doubt they could surprise me with anything involving those three characters. I'm guessing Myrcella dies and Brienne kills Stannis? I guess I'll find out for myself!
Guess I have to retire this avatar now thats he dead
Interesting interview with Dan Weiss.
They seem to take ambiguity very seriously, which means they're either messing with Stannis fans for kicks or Stannis did not die.
Yep. And they got back together. Then broke up again. And now have been hanging out as friends.... I wouldn't trust Kit Harrington about this relationship status anymore than I trust him about Jon Snow being alive.I thought he and Rose broke up?
Fans always get obsessive and some to the point where they'll take anything as fact just to have something new to obsess about. Some fansites get so bad they start basing fact on wiki edits. I wouldn't put much stock in them over common sense.I used to be the same way, but I've watched everyone (and I do mean everyone) on several fansites treat the moment the site is updated as the all-important "time of death" for show characters. I admit I have absolutely no idea how this custom began and it's possible my experience is entirely circumstantial, but after a certain point I took it at face value, just the same as the leads on sites like WatchersontheWall seem to do.
Interesting interview with Dan Weiss.
They seem to take ambiguity very seriously, to the point of discussing individual frames. To me this means they're either messing with Stannis fans for kicks or Stannis did not die.
It's so different to the books that it won't matter much to me either, even though having more Stephen Dillane is always a good thing. He did a fantastic job this season. Ideally speaking he'd be a serious contender for the supporting actor emmy award.I'm fine with Stannis being dead or alive tbh. His arc can work either way.
Right, this is where I'm at too. If the show never existed people would still be pointing to the two books in question as where it went off the rails. But now that the show is attempting to adapt what we all consider a beautiful mess at best and a long, boring, complicated slog that doesn't advance the plot at worst ... it's like people are forgetting that this is actually a pretty decent job making that source material work.
Dorne was a problem but will probably pay off. The Iron Islands are going to be a train wreck but will probably pay off. Winterfell was cleaned up a bit and Ramsay looks godlike, Stannis' march was shortened but we can hand-wave most of those criticisms away.
I guess I don't see how most of these complaints don't start with the source material being a mess. Which most of us agree on.
Redemption. You don't break a character like that and not kill him without redemption being the end goal. Expect Stannis to try and find a noble cause to die for.Guys, Stannis did not die. They cut to black, they wouldn't do that in a show which has shown more gory stuff like Jon's death. And, Stannis killed his daughter, he isn't a good guy like Jon. Second, if they were going to have Brienne kill him they would have had her stab him in the heart. You know to really shove the irony in our face. My question is why is he alive? His story seems to be over.
Redemption. You don't break a character like that and not kill him without redemption being the end goal. Expect Stannis to try and find a noble cause to die for.
Fans always get obsessive and some to the point where they'll take anything as fact just to have something new to obsess about. Some fansites get so bad they start basing fact on wiki edits. I wouldn't put much stock in them over common sense.
Keeping Stannis around might also give Davos a little more to do so he can learn he burnt Shireen.
THEN Stannis will die.