Would they ever make a king's mother the queen if he died?
I still kinda hope that Jon is the child of a drunken one night stand between Ned and Lyanna. Just for ironic reasons considering Ned was investigating Cersei and Jamie during season 1.
Not in feudalism unless the queen was also part of her husband's family and next in line which Cersei isn't.
But then if the show had stayed true to actual feudalism, Olenna wouldn't be in control of the Reach and neither would the Sand Snakes.
There's be huge rumblings in both kingdoms and potential civil wars about who the new heir is.
Can anyone explain the scene with Ned and his sister? I don't get it... What happened exactly, where are they, why are they there and who is the father (I assume a Targaryen)?
In the case of Olenna and Ellaria it's obvious they simplified things but with Cersei she clearly usurped power, and that will be a major plot point in season 7.
Simplified? More like jumped over logic but I'll give you Cersei. She wouldn't be Tommen's heir though.
A Great Council would traditionally be called to determine who the heir is.
Cersei is the great council lol.
I wonder who she'll staff aside from Qyburn, Jamie looks to be turning from her and the only other 'person' left is Robert Strong.
Yeah, with the sept burning being the green screen. I was responding to the pictures of Wun Wun CG and all that.
I'm always interested to learn how they did certain things. What always interests me is how some simple things you think are real are not really there, and some really spectacular things are right there on the set.
Black Sun, what I'm about to say is what I perceive as the reason for why the readers put Ellaria Sand in charge of Dorne. I'm not saying it's right or logical, but I believe it represents the rationale behind their decisions.
1) A Game of Queens - The show needed all the male leaders replaced by female ones, or usurped/killed by them at the very least. You have Dany, Ellaria, Yara, Cersei, Sansa, Arya all making huge power plays and killing male leaders, or trying to.
2) The fewer characters, the better. Dan and Dave have repeated this line about playing the game with fewer pieces, and it's clear that this reasoning along with #1 was why they chose to end the Martell line, while putting Ellaria in charge. It doesn't make any sense that all the houses of Dorne would be okay with this, but if they had left Doran in charge, they would have had to film more Dorne scenes. The location of Dorne is done with the show. I predict a banner on a bunch of ships is all we'll see of them from this point on.
3) Uniting house Tyrell and House...uh...Sand under the Targaryen name. This is another interesting one because it's eliminated House Tyrell and the queen/heir to Highgarden under the same circumstances that they dispatched the Martells. With Margaery, Mace, and Loras all in the exploding room, they no longer have need for any more conversations between Reach characters. Olenna is their sole representative, and we'll probably never see her again because her sole function was to either scheme or put other characters in their place. It seems like most houses are being reduced down to a spokesperson irrespective of political realities because this is a television show where certain actors command more screen time than others. That's just how it is, sadly.
Cersei is the great council lol.
I wonder who she'll staff aside from Qyburn, Jamie looks to be turning from her and the only other 'person' left is Robert Strong.
You guys know that when someone "ursurps" something they usually make up their own rules right?
Well yeah Cersei would do that but there's no evidence in the show that Ellaria has her own army or the support of the other houses in Dorne.
You guys know that when someone "ursurps" something they usually make up their own rules right?
Our problem isn't that usurpers make of their own rules, it's that the showrunners are doing the same thing.
D & D are usurpers of the one true canon.
All those that support them are my foes.
Well yeah Cersei would do that but there's no evidence in the show that Ellaria has her own army or the support of the other houses in Dorne.
Ellaria straight up says that the Dornish people are disgusted with Doran in the scene you're talking about.I believe the show wants us to assume that the Dornish guards who watched as Doran was killed is enough proof that Dorne will get behind Ellaria and the Sand Snakes.
Ellaria straight up says that the Dornish people are disgusted with Doran in the scene you're talking about.
People are disgusted with the Lannisters. You don't see random women walking into the throne room and cutting Tommen's head off.
People are disgusted with the Lannisters. You don't see random women walking into the throne room and cutting Tommen's head off.
But he wasn't. Cersei is the Lady of Casterly Rock.
She just glommed onto it after Kevan died. Legally, Jamie has a stronger claim.
Well no. Cersei inherited it after Tywin died.
Sons come first in the line of succession. Jaime was KG at time and Tyrion was attainted. Next comes daughters so Cersei gets it.
Kevan would only get it if Cersei, Tommen and Myrcella all died without having anymore children.
No. The actual succession was unclear. That's about as deep as it went.
Cerci only ever claimed that at her coronation.
Not in feudalism unless the queen was also part of her husband's family and next in line which Cersei isn't.
But then if the show had stayed true to actual feudalism, Olenna wouldn't be in control of the Reach and neither would the Sand Snakes.
There's be huge rumblings in both kingdoms and potential civil wars about who the new heir is.
When did the show ever say this? At best, he was Lord in name only. Stannis was the Lord of Storms End and in open rebellion against the crown. Tommen may have controlled the region in name but still wasn't Lord of Dragonstone or Storms End.She can keep both if she wants to.
Tommen was the Lord of the Stormlands while he was king. Myrcella was never the Lady of the Stormlands.
When did the show ever say this? At best, he was Lord in name only. Stannis was the Lord of Storms End and in open rebellion against the crown. Tommen may have controlled the region in name but still wasn't Lord of Dragonstone or Storms End.
And Kings usually didn't keep their lordship of their castle when they moved onto Kings Landing. Robert gave Storms End to Renly and the Targs always left Dragonstone to the heir apparent.
Unless the show says otherwise, Jaime is assumed the Lord of Casterly Rock.
I might be wrong, but wasn't Renly the Lord of Storms End, both in the books and the show?In the show, Stannis doesn't hold Storm's End.
And well it does say otherwise because Jaime is referred to as Ser Jaime not Lord Jaime.
You're not allowed to leave the thread alone, your avatar has to grace each and every ASoIaF/GoT thread now and in the future. #BestLordAs soon as news/set reports of season 7 start coming out, I'm checking out of this thread. Time for my first full blackout since season 1. It's been a pleasure, and as always, madness has had its day.
What was the point in withholding Jon's true name?
Are you in... the wrong thread?
Isn't the Iron Throne now pretty much open for everyone to claim it now? No Baratheons, no Lannister children. The only one from the Baratheon line, that could have a claim to the throne would be Gendry, but that's pretty much a no-go as he's a bastard. In the books there's also Mya Stone and Edric Storm, the latter even acknowledged to be Roberts son yet not legitimized.
That bastard stuff is also what pretty much prevents Jon from automatically getting the Iron Throne after his heritage is made public. Wonder if the show actually has something that makes Jon a legitim son of Rhaegar, like a document signed by Rhaegar. There's still Howland Reed from the books, could use him for something like this.
I might be wrong, but wasn't Renly the Lord of Storms End, both in the books and the show?
If Jaime doesn't inherit the title of Lord of Casterlyrock, then who is the current lord? Tywin dead, Kevan dead, Tyrion isn't even a contender due to his killing of his father, and since Cersei's plot was also the cause of death of Kevan, i don't see her getting the title either.
You're not allowed to leave the thread alone, your avatar has to grace each and every ASoIaF/GoT thread now and in the future. #BestLord
No but I haven't read the books since ADWD came out and I don't remember that scene...
So...I just found out that many years ago, Carice van Houten was in a family film where she played a cat who got transformed into a human woman on account of getting covered by radioactive waste.
I feel like this is the most significant human discovery since the invention of the wheel.
Your problem is assuming the show has any actual internal logical consistencyBran bringing down the magic of the Wall by crossing it after being touched by the Night King doesn't make a lick of sense. Otherwise the NK would have just touched somebody thousands of years ago and let him cross back to nullify the magic. For example, the deserter that Ned killed at the beginning of the series.
The magic of the cave was some Children of the Forest stuff, the Wall is something else as far as I know.
What was the point in withholding Jon's true name?
To save it for more flashbacks next season. Or for that Howland Reed arrival that seems less and less likely to happen haha.It would have no meaning now. More effective dramatically to make it a mystery and then reveal it next year after context has been established via prophecies and flashbacks. Then viewers will suddenly go "ooooooooh" and spend all week talking about it. That's how you do modern tv.
Howland Reed = Maester Marwyn lolMaybe Howland Reed is at the Citadel. They could compress his appearence with Sam's story.
Come on, it's more likely that Reed shows that Littlefinger and Varys aren't the only ones with teleporting skills and just happily enters the Great Hall of Winterfell just seconds after Jon was proclaimed King in the North! You could really try to make some true predictions. ;]Maybe Howland Reed is at the Citadel. They could compress his appearence with Sam's story.
wouldn't it make sense for meera to go home with bran? and meet reed there?
but how is she ever gonna get there when benjen took their last horse.
My theory is that as Aegon unites the south, he hears about the North and Euron and gathers two different armies to help the North and Reach out simultaneously and then Daenerys come out of nowhere and attacks him which then domino effects into Stannis having to sacrifice his daughter because no one is coming to help as he's surrounded by WW at Winterfell.
Bran bringing down the magic of the Wall by crossing it after being touched by the Night King doesn't make a lick of sense. Otherwise the NK would have just touched somebody thousands of years ago and let him cross back to nullify the magic. For example, the deserter that Ned killed at the beginning of the series.
The magic of the cave was some Children of the Forest stuff, the Wall is something else as far as I know.