Finn of Ooo
Member
Can we talk about the fact that it took an entire city of woodworkers and smiths to make a single scorpion but somehow the Iron Islanders put together a huge fleet complete with trebuchets and ammo in one episode?
Can we talk about the fact that it took an entire city of woodworkers and smiths to make a single scorpion but somehow the Iron Islanders put together a huge fleet complete with trebuchets and ammo in one episode?
You mean like Dany thinking the invasion would be a cakewalk and her entire plan along with her alliances with three Westeros houses being destroyed within 2 episodes because they underestimated their enemy? The show should probably do something like that.
You mean like Dany thinking the invasion would be a cakewalk and her entire plan along with her alliances with three Westeros houses being destroyed within 2 episodes because they underestimated their enemy? The show should probably do something like that.
Or cersei blowing up the equivalent of the westerosi vatican? Killing the small people's favourite queen (margery) and getting away with it scott free?
Or Jon Snow leaving the Nights Watch, with not a word from any other character. The first major thing Ned Stark did in the series was execute a deserter.
Given the state of westeros at the end of season 6, the invasion should have been a cake walk. Euron was introduced and utilised as a cheap way of levelling the playing field.
Her son killed himself due to her actions.Or cersei blowing up the equivalent of the westerosi vatican? Killing the small people's favourite queen (margery) and getting away with it scott free?
"Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death."Or Jon Snow leaving the Nights Watch, with not a word from any other character. The first major thing Ned Stark did in the series was execute a deserter.
Euron is a cheap plot device so far, I'll give you that.Given the state of westeros at the end of season 6, the invasion should have been a cake walk. Euron was introduced and utilised as a cheap way of levelling the playing field.
-Jon died, so his watch ended. He didn't abandon the Nights Watch
-The show explains that no one knows for a fact that it was her, plus she's the one in power... Up to you to judge whether or not thats a good enough answer
-Jon died, so his watch ended. He didn't abandon the Nights Watch
Her son killed himself due to her actions.
"Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death."
He died. Watch over.
Euron is a cheap plot device so far, I'll give you that.
Why would the northern lords care about his vows if king jons only purpose left is to fight white walkers anyway? He's essentially still lord commander of the nights watch. Just doing it with a "title" but it's believable that no one would care about that part of the vow when they're fighting back armies of zombies
I dunno, the impression I get is that most people don't really take the Night's Watch seriously nor do they care much about their vows. Ned Stark cared, but he's pretty special in that regard. Sam also broke his vows and brings a woman and child with him. No one in his family seemed shocked or disgusted. Until they find out she's one of "them" anyway. So racism is more widespread than people caring about the honor of vows it seems.
Recall in the books Stannis, the most by the rules dude of all time, offered Winterfell to Jon and wanted to get Jon to break his Night's Watch vows.
People bend their beliefs to fit the situation. The Lords of the North are no different.
Eastwatch? That's what the episode called?
Isn't that on the Wall? Is it happening? Is it winter?
Based on the pictures I don't think your assumptions are correct. Unless we see more magical teleporting.
Why is no one in the show asking Jon about leaving the night's watch?
Why is no one in the show asking Jon about leaving the night's watch?
Based on the pictures I don't think your assumptions are correct. Unless we see more magical teleporting.
Can we please stop, this argument will go the same way it has gone the last 10 times we've had it in this thread.Why is no one in the show asking Jon about leaving the night's watch?
Eastwatch? That's what the episode called?
Isn't that on the Wall? Is it happening? Is it winter?
Not everyone knows he died is my point.He died.
His watch is ended.
Hello.
Ugh I hate when I take time off from OT topics and come back after shit storms. I didn't know this was a sore subject.Can we please stop, this argument will go the same it went the last 10 times we've had it in this thread.
Why is no one in the show asking Jon about leaving the night's watch?
I am sure we are going to see what happens at Eastwatch towards the end of the episode or something, Most of these pictures look like the aftermath of the last battle. Didnt Jon send the Wildlings to Eastwatch Castle?
Tormund Giantsbane was sent to man Eastwatch by the Sea. I'm guessing he meets up with the Brotherhood without Banners, who are also headed to the wall.
In episode 2 Jon sends them there because he believes the Others will attack it.I guess I missed this part? Didnt realize they were headed to the wall... Why are they again? I have no idea what they are doing...
In episode 2 Jon sends them there because he believes the Others will attack it.
A king can release anyone from their vows, I believe. Stannis could release Jon from the Night's Watch and legitimize him as a Stark if Jon accepted (in the eyes of the people who view Stannis as king).
Granny: Is there any chance that Jon could be released from his oaths of the nightwatch?
George_RR_Martin: The great council would have released Aemon from his maester's oath, so I suppose it would be possible. With an appropriate authority.
In the books, Lady mormont had a letter from King Robb Stark releasing Jon from his service with the night watch and naming Jon his heir and king of the north. The show, like in most cases, does a bad job explaining things.
I never really thought too hard about it, but the answer seems to be a vague maybe, maybe not? GRRM himself weighed in.
https://movies.stackexchange.com/qu...ase-a-man-of-the-nights-watch-from-their-vows
Do they just want a leader and he'll do? Maybe, but that doesn't answer why they have appointed a bastard deserter with bad military strategy to be their king..
Watch the scene of the Hound looking into the fire again.I know why the wildings are headed there but the post said the brotherhood was headed to the wall... huh?
i think technically the nights watch is supposed to be independent even from kings and queens, and therefore even a king would not be able to release someone from their vows. this independence from the seven kingdoms was a big deal early on in the series but obviously changed over time
i've personally always taken stannis' offer as yet another example of the ongoing theme of "Honor is important, until it isn't"
I know why the wildings are headed there but the post said the brotherhood was headed to the wall... huh?
Are you sure it was HBO's choice to do a season 8 and not the writers'?If I remember right D&D wanted to finish the series with a 10 episode season 7, but HBO wanted a season 8, that's why we have 7 and 6 episode seasons. So it's not about budget, the writers just wanna move on, but HBO didn't let them.
And all the hate D&D gets, people should understand that it's not easy for them. They signed up to adapt books, and probably didn't expect the books to just stop coming out. So now they have to write the show without any source material while getting hate from the bookreaders, it's no wonder they wanted to finish it.
Plus couldn't you say that...Jon could fuck up your strat and still win? That's gotta count for something XD.
Not everyone knows he died is my point.
Surely the lords of the north would have questioned serving a king brought back from the dead.
I never really thought too hard about it, but the answer seems to be a vague maybe, maybe not? GRRM himself weighed in.
https://movies.stackexchange.com/qu...ase-a-man-of-the-nights-watch-from-their-vows