• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Video Shows US Border Agents Make 16-year-old Boy Drink Liquid Meth Until He Dies

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dyle

Member
If they had any reason to believe that it was an illegal substance, which they clearly did since they asked him to drink it, then they shouldn't have made him drink it. Shouldn't garbage like this be illegal under the Fifth Amendment as self-incrimination?
 

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
Did anyone actually read the story? Dude lied and said it was AJ... they asked him to drink it and he did. Death or jail... he made his choice.

He made the choice and paid for it at such a young age.

CBP should not be enabling something like this under coercion.
 
I really don't understand why it wasn't confiscated and the kid detained. It's obviously not juice. There's no pretending that is was, so why was everyone involved so stupid as to let this "game" play out??
 

ponpo

( ≖‿≖)
Is there no quick drug testing available?

Yes

“I’m not prepared to say they knew for certain that it was going to kill him. … It’s obvious that they suspected from the beginning that it’s meth,” Iredale said. “Playing a cruel joke on a child is not something that’s justifiable in any way. They have test kits available that would’ve given results in two to three minutes.”

Iredale said the officers did test the liquid for drugs, but only after the teen started overdosing.
 

Johndoey

Banned
I'm assuming their suspicion wasn't that strong and they assumed if it was drugs he just would refuse to drink it. Still clearly negligent. The article said the drug test would take 3 minutes so the alternative is they are sociopaths and reasonably believed it actually was drugs and wanted to kill him.



Yeah he lied and drank it, but if the guards had a reasonable suspicion that it was actually drugs, it's on them for suggesting he do so. If TSA catches an inert grenade in someone's bag at an airport, they don't tell them to pull the pin to prove it.
He's sixteen years old, sixteen years olds do stupid shit when put upon. Even if he wasn't the fucking drink test ain't protocol. Stoping people the benefit of the doubt for no reason.

They could've tested the liquid instead that deliberately gambled this kids life on a gotcha.
 

Monocle

Member
Did anyone actually read the story? Dude lied and said it was AJ... they asked him to drink it and he did. Death or jail... he made his choice.
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...

Yeah, it's hardly fair to frame this in terms of choice when you're talking about a 16-year-old in a coercive situation, lol.
 

Auraela

Banned
If they had any reason to believe that it was an illegal substance, which they clearly did since they asked him to drink it, then they shouldn't have made him drink it. Shouldn't garbage like this be illegal under the Fifth Amendment as self-incrimination?

After they said drink it to prove wrong at that point wouldn't you just come clean?
 

shaneo632

Member
Why would he drink it? Not that I am condoning the actions of the officers, because obviously they are idiots. Also, what do you use it for in liquid form? Does it get used to make other drugs?

Young and scared. People do dumb shit all the time when put in tough situations, especially by an authority figure.
 

ponpo

( ≖‿≖)
He's sixteen years old, sixteen years olds do stupid shit when put upon. Stop giving people the benefit of the doubt for no reason.

Huh? I already said he probably didn't think it would kill him, especially if he was a randomly recruited drug mule.
 
Did anyone actually read the story? Dude lied and said it was AJ... they asked him to drink it and he did. Death or jail... he made his choice.
Yeah, and that option shouldn't have been on the table at all if they at all suspected anything, which they clearly did. That's not a game you play chicken little about. The kid might not know better, but the officers should be better than making something like that a stupid game. Just say they don't believe him and confiscate and test it. No need to make or dare him to actually dare him to drink the stuff, under ANY circumstance. That's completely unacceptable to play with people's lives like that, and no matter what you want to say about him, we should expect better from officers. Or should they be held to the standards of some 16 year old? Because I sure think not.
 

BlueTsunami

there is joy in sucking dick
Did anyone actually read the story? Dude lied and said it was AJ... they asked him to drink it and he did. Death or jail... he made his choice.

So Border agent protocol is... find possible illicit substance...

A) Confiscate it and test it

Or

B) Have a minor possibly drink a dangerous substance as proof

I cant believe someone is actually arguing this middle aged gentleman (sarcasm) made his choice. Sixteen years old!
 

Foffy

Banned
You know, it takes some set of balls for these people who likely believe this person has an illegal substance on him and just straight up tell him to drink it. More than once.

What the fuck did they think was gonna happen? I can't even rationalize this.

Did they assume the kid knew what it was and come clean?

Did they assume small sips weren't that bad?

Did they even fuckin' care?
 
Arrest those pieces of shit. How have they not broken a fucking law here?

I'd like to hear from our liberal posters who are anti-immigration.

Well fuck.

I suppose I get to guess what your viewpoints on immigration policy are so your heinous here can decree whether I'm pro-immigration enough to be anti-murder.

What a piece of shit post. Especially given the speed at which this tragedy is being usurped to troll.
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
Did anyone actually read the story? Dude lied and said it was AJ... they asked him to drink it and he did. Death or jail... he made his choice.

Even going by this sociopathic reasoning they were still destroying evidence.
Even just handing him the evidence could have blown the case for prosecutors.
 
Should people take responsibility for their actions? Absolutely. What happened here was WRONG. On BOTH sides.

When I look at situations like this, I ask myself two simple questions:

1. Could this outcome have been prevented?
2. Who/what influenced these people to make the actions they made?

I saw so many posters casting their views primarily at those law enforcement, and I really try to observe the large overview.
 
Did anyone actually read the story? Dude lied and said it was AJ... they asked him to drink it and he did. Death or jail... he made his choice.

This is an example of gross negligence.

If you suspect someone is carrying drugs, or you're at all wary of what said item is - take it and test it.

Basic logical procedure.
 

ponpo

( ≖‿≖)
You know, it takes some set of balls for these people who likely believe this person has an illegal substance on him and just straight up tell him to drink it. More than once.

What the fuck did they think was gonna happen? I can't even rationalize this.

Did they assume the kid knew what it was and come clean?

Did they assume small sips weren't that bad?

Did they even fuckin' care?

Any "benefit of the doubt" given to border patrol would probably be for the bolded. They thought enough about it to question him though so clearly an awful idea anyway.
 

krazen

Member
Of course.

in the US criminals are seen as sub human animals and the WORST case the police are let off with a slap of the wrist.

I don't blame the cops.

I blame US as a nation where we've built up this culture of cops and robbers where if someone is the 'badguy' they get whatever they have coming to them (even its a minor crime or they are eventually found innocent).

Like for shame; and the most disturbing part of this is how some of the biggest proponents see themselves as law abiding good christian folk. Disgusting.
 

Auraela

Banned
Maybe he thought it wouldn't kill him? Or maybe he's afraid of what the cartel having him do this will do to him or his family if he's caught?

Thats true ill say both sides are in the wrong. A 16 year old shouldn't have this product in first place..but border control shoulda stopped it going this far
 
Should people take responsibility for their actions? Absolutely. What happened here was WRONG. On BOTH sides.

When I look at situations like this, I ask myself two simple questions:

1. Could this outcome have been prevented?
2. Who/what influenced these people to make the actions they made?

I saw so many posters casting their views primarily at those law enforcement, and I really try to observe the large overview.

If the the law enforcements knew it was a suspicious liquid they should have confiscated it and had it tested. If someone had a gun and you wanted proof that is wasn't loaded would you tell the person to pull the trigger on themselves? There are procedures the officers should have followed but didn't cuz for some reason they wanted to be entertained.
 

krazen

Member
Should people take responsibility for their actions? Absolutely. What happened here was WRONG. On BOTH sides.

When I look at situations like this, I ask myself two simple questions:

1. Could this outcome have been prevented?
2. Who/what influenced these people to make the actions they made?

I saw so many posters casting their views primarily at those law enforcement, and I really try to observe the large overview.

lol.
On both sides, huh.

I love this imaginary place where a 16 year old fucking up = deserving to basically get killed by adults who are supposed to be professionals at this kind of thing
 

Tagyhag

Member
Should people take responsibility for their actions? Absolutely. What happened here was WRONG. On BOTH sides.

When I look at situations like this, I ask myself two simple questions:

1. Could this outcome have been prevented?
2. Who/what influenced these people to make the actions they made?

I saw so many posters casting their views primarily at those law enforcement, and I really try to observe the large overview.

Because ultimately it is on them.

Expecting a 16 year old kid who is under extreme duress to have the same rationale as a full grown ICE agent is insane.

What kind of professional who works for the government should be allowed to say "Lol drink it then, chicken"

Yes, the kid made mistakes, but it is not a time to victim blame.
 

pigeon

Banned
Thats true ill say both sides are in the wrong. A 16 year old shouldn't have this product in first place..but border control shoulda stopped it going this far

That's why it's fucking illegal for him to have the product. We already covered that part of the problem. Now we should address the part where the police officers killed him extrajudicially for having it.
 
Again he wasn't forced too he coulda said yea i lied at that point.
And they could have ripped it away from him. They didn't have to let him drink at all, and on top of that they DEFINITELY didn't have to encourage him to keep drinking more, when they clearly knew what was in it. That happened on their watch, and they could have stopped it, but they not only didn't do so, but they encouraged him to keep going despite knowing exactly what was in it and exactly what would happen. They're purely responsible for that. That's not something they had to do, that was something they had no reason to do, but they did so anyway and then doubled down on it. That's on them and they should bare the consequences for them. Again, say whatever you want on the kid, but nothing can change those facts. Unless we're going to hold them to the standards of behavior of a 16 year-old and no higher, because I'd hope the bar would be a bit higher than that, but that's me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom