WTF with the gif????????????
Sometimes defense force for everything in gaf is cute, but people actually defending these horrible actions done by the regime, and deflecting the issue into Iraq and other nations, is truly saddening. WTF is wrong with the Assad´s defense force here on gaf?
You want to talk about Iraq and other nations, make a damn thread, and stop deflecting and showing horrible gifs in this one.
Links? I searched on Youtube and I didn't see any obvious use of incendiary ammunitions on inhabited zones. Don't you think there would be more casualty reports if that type of weapons were used on civilians on a regular basis?
Plus are we to believe the place shown in the report, is the place the bomb exploded? The place is barely destroyed or burnt.
WTF with the gif????????????
Sometimes defense force for everything in gaf is cute, but people actually defending these horrible actions done by the regime, and deflecting the issue into Iraq and other nations, is truly saddening. WTF is wrong with the Assad´s defense force here on gaf?
You want to talk about Iraq and other nations, make a damn thread, and stop deflecting and showing horrible gifs in this one.
What can you say, feel for the people caught in the crossfire. What a shitty situation. And there's no way I'm clicking.
What is everyone's obsession with Syria lately?
So many cowards and tin foil hat theories.
Yeh especially when Confidential Cables from WikiLeaks confirm it.
Must be the Evil Julian Assange who made this all up years ago because he knew he could he could assist people like me in forum crusades.
Get back to me when you have first hand experience in a middle eastern conflict. Until then enjoy your access to fresh water and the safety of not being bombed.
OOOOOPS big Mistake, I was in Lebanon in the summer of 2006.
I was in Iraq in 2006 and in 2009, get over yourself.
http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/12/12/syria-incendiary-weapons-used-populated-areas
Of course HRW are probably stooges for US and UK intelligence too right Fabrik
And yet you still think the US fight wars for anything other than profit.
And yet you still think the US wages wars for anything other than profit and the joke of it all is that the profit isn't even for the American people.
I don't think anyone is defending that piece of shit Assad, they just preemptively argue while pointing out USA's hypocrisy because they expect people to use it as an excuse for an interventionist war.
Yea because the war in Iraq/Afanistan has really paid off!
Actually, the joke of it is that years of bad foreign policy has produced people like you.
CHEEZMO;79096645 said:Here's one that turned up immediately. There's dozens and dozens of videos exactly the same as this. You could easily find them if you actually wanted to; they're not exactly hidden or anything http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxV8Xae2ERQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pbq7EGqe_Qc
What matters is where bombs are dropped. The first video doesn't show where they landed. In the second, it landed on a empty area. There's no video of massive civilian destruction. The Syrian army is clearly not firing blindly and relentlessly.
Yea because the war in Iraq/Afanistan has really paid off!
The Harbingers of death always profit. Coincidence I guess.
Companies profiting = giant elaborate conspiracy.
Those headaches I occasionally get must be a result of Big Advil.
Evil fucks.
Companies profiting = giant elaborate conspiracy.
Those headaches I occasionally get must be a result of Big Advil.
Evil fucks.
BBC Monitoring reports that Syrian TV has misquoted Labour leader Ed Miliband as saying the chemical attack near Damascus was the work of rebels. Government satellite news channel Al-Ikhbariyah al-Suriyah quoted Miliband as saying that he "fully understands" that it was "armed groups" (the usual government term for rebels) that used chemical weapons in the Ghouta.
Companies profiting = giant elaborate conspiracy.
Those headaches I occasionally get must be a result of Big Advil.
Evil fucks.
You can't be that naive. Do you really believe that the war profiteers have nothing to do with these wars? Have you even read anything in your life about Cheney?
Now just humor me, what would happen to them if there were no wars for their clients to get involved in?
We start wars for corporations according to this thread.
We start wars for many stupid reasons, but in many ocasions corporations and politicians invested in said corporations are usually among the ones (if not the ones) pushing the hardest for them.
I think war profiteers have positioned themselves to make a lot of money off an awful thing. I DON'T believe that wars are intentionally started simply to make these companies profit.
They'd go into door to door vacuum cleaning sales obviously.
People are dying in horrible ways all over the globe. Syria sucks, no doubt, but selectively picking where we take action is not a good idea.
No one is arguing that there are companies who profit from war. But to suggest that something like Iraq was started with the sole purpose of giving Haliburton profit is silly.
No one is arguing that there are companies who profit from war. But to suggest that something like Iraq was started with the sole purpose of giving Haliburton profit is silly.
Look dead children in somalia. EVERYONE DO NOTHING.Now that you mention it:
Somalia famine 'killed 260,000 people' from 2010 to 2012
Where was the Sunni outrage there?
A fraction of the Billions spent on weapons to conquer a country could have saved 260k Muslims.
WikiLeaks cable: AU SUMMIT: A/S CARSON'S MEETING WITH SOMALI PRESIDENT SHEIKH SHARIF
![]()
So the people supporting the Jihadists have malicious intentions and don't care for preserving human life but they themselves aren't? is that the argument the Islamist apologists are pushing?
War against a foreign country only happens when the moneyed classes think they are going to profit from it.
George Orwell
And the kind of war does not matter, Jihad, Responsibility to Protect, Humanitarian Intervention, or Imperialist Regime change.
Who said sole purpose?
The biggest advocates for Western intervention in Syria is Saudi Arabia, Qatar and as 3rd probably Turkey after they realized their operation wasn't going to cut it, they don't even have an arms industry, but it is an added incentive for the US economy to take another grab out of the national debt jar.
What matters is where bombs are dropped. The first video doesn't show where they landed. In the second, it landed on a empty area. There's no video of massive civilian destruction. The Syrian army is clearly not firing blindly and relentlessly.
I'm against intervention in Syria, but this is stupid. If you can't intervene everywhere, you can intervene nowhere? Utter rubbish.
CHEEZMO;79099753 said:I'm sure the cluster bomblets dropped from a thousand feet up by a moving aircraft missed the residential buildings by metres on purpose.
Residential buildings probably occupied by armed rebels. The civilians have or should have evacuated. Anyway I don't support any camp. I'm just against the use of propaganda to justify an intervention to help the rebels. Why no western media show atrocities committed by the rebels? Why is it so unilaterally one-sided? Why do we want to help extremists?
Where is the problem? - It`s terrible but some guys here abuse this kids for her war drums.
None of this kids wants more dead people, they want a diplomatic solution.
Israel used white phosphorus in gaza, attack israel.
A civil war is awful but an attack is no solution.
It is scandalous to misuse these children for his cause.
Residential buildings probably occupied by armed rebels. The civilians have or should have evacuated. Anyway I don't support any camp. I'm just against the use of propaganda to justify an intervention to help the rebels. Why no western media show atrocities committed by the rebels? Why is it so unilaterally one-sided? Why do we want to help extremists?
How about this one ? http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a70_1360150672
Relentless enough or not ? Or wait, that little girl is positioned suspiciously near to where the shell hit! False Flag!!!