DopeyFish said:Right now it's trending alongside TPM with already +80 million. That means it should probably hit $500 million domestic. star wars prequels domestic are 46 and 47% of worldwide.
So if we assume 500 million and we assume 46~47%, it has a very good chance of breaking 1 bil.
Dan said:I believe before Star Wars came onto the scene, this year was down 22% or something in ticket sales.
Kabuki Waq said:movie budgets are getting higher too.
REally anyone who doesnt sneak in food from other places has money to burn
I usually just grab a can of coke and then eat after the movie at some restaurant.
DopeyFish said:If I used phantom menace's numbers... episode 3 would look like it'd be the first movie to challenge Titanic.
kIdMuScLe said:so what was number 1? cuz at my theater longest yard was sold out even interlocked so it was on 7 screens, Star Wars looked good not sold out but good it was on 5 screens, and madagascar looked the worst out of the three.........
Wishful thinking? It's been well-marketed, and the trailers have been excellent. Doubt it.SteveMeister said:On the 10th, Mr and Mrs Smith is gonna be a flop. It just has that Ecks vs Sever vibe to it. If it makes more than $45M in the first weekend I'll be surprised.
FoneBone said:Wishful thinking? It's been well-marketed, and the trailers have been excellent. Doubt it.
shantyman said:Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are a couple of orders of magnitude bigger stars than Antonio and (especially) Lucy though.
on the topic of how well it is being marketed, you see tv spots for it like three times every hour. and because of jolie being co-lead, you can market it both during typical male programming as well as female programming. I have to agree with fonebone.. they are marketing this thing superbly. not to mention the huge banners at most movie theaters.. easily the biggest ad currently in any of the theaters I have been in the last 2-3 weeks.SteveMeister said:But I don't think it has been that heavily marketed, and I just have a feeling that it's not going to be all that good.
borghe said:on the topic of how well it is being marketed, you see tv spots for it like three times every hour. and because of jolie being co-lead, you can market it both during typical male programming as well as female programming. I have to agree with fonebone.. they are marketing this thing superbly. not to mention the huge banners at most movie theaters.. easily the biggest ad currently in any of the theaters I have been in the last 2-3 weeks.
as far as quality.. ewll, we'll have to see. it LOOKS good from the trailers, but then again so did Last Man Standing.
DarienA said:Ok but that doesn't mean anything by itself... Angelina Jolie being a huge star certainly didn't help Cradle of Life
shantyman said:True, but that also wasn't meant to be a summer blockbuster.
SteveMeister said:Are you kidding me? It was released mid-summer on 3222 screens. It cost $95M to make, and they spent around $35M on marketing. Those aren't the kind of numbers spent on a movie the makers don't have high box office hopes for.
Kung Fu Jedi said:Exactly what I was thinking SteveMeister!
Shogmaster said:You two should just get a room.Who's Jennifer jason Leigh and who's Bridget Fonda I wonder? :lol
Kung Fu Jedi said:Oh. I'm totally the stalker here!![]()
SteveMeister said:Are you kidding me? It was released mid-summer on 3222 screens. It cost $95M to make, and they spent around $35M on marketing. Those aren't the kind of numbers spent on a movie the makers don't have high box office hopes for.
shantyman said:Actually, it wasn't. It was dumped/released in September becauser the studio knew they had a shit sandwich on their hands.
http://imdb.com/title/tt0308208/releaseinfo
When they made it, the intention was likely to make a summer hit, but they screwed it up. Mr. and Mrs. Smith actually is coming out at a time when it could be a blockbuster. I guess it depends on your point of view.
Tritroid said:Damn, and I'm sure Willco was praying for Eps III to be beaten. :lol Ah well, better pump up the PT trolling efforts in the latest SW thread Will!
Anyway, kudos to Eps III. Well deserved imo. I'm kinda shocked however that it's ahead of Episode I? That movie had so much 'wow' factor going for it since it was the first Star Wars in 20 years.
Check the link he posted -- he was talking about Ecks vs. Sever.SteveMeister said:Hm, Box Office Mojo (which unlike IMDB is not a user-contributed database) has the release date as July 25, 2003:
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=tombraider2.htm
And Rotten Tomatoes shows that as the release date as well:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lara_croft_tomb_raider_the_cradle_of_life/
Same with Yahoo:
http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&cf=info&id=1808416901
Heck, Ebert's review of the movie is that date:
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20030725/REVIEWS/307250302/1023
I'm not saying you (or IMDB) are WRONG, but IMDB seems to be the only place that doesn't show a release date of 7/25/03.
FoneBone said:Check the link he posted -- he was talking about Ecks vs. Sever.
border said:Mr and Mrs Smith has been marketed since frickin' February, in the form of all the Pitt/Jolie hoopla and the divorce. Idiots will go to the movie just because of that.
The Experiment said:I'm surprised The Longest Yard did so well.