I'm surprised no one posted this yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0d6yBHDvKUw
Sure I would like HL3, especially because of how Ep. 2 ended, but I'd rather have them be pleased about it instead of churning out a mediocre successor for the sake of having a sequel. If they think they can't deliver that, then so be it.
At this point, they will never be able to meet expectations anyway. Maybe they should never make it.
At this point, they will never be able to meet expectations anyway. Maybe they should never make it.
That's an interesting thing.
If/when HL3 happens, what's to say it will conclude the series? Obviously EP2 doesn't end in a very satisfying way for an end of a story, but HL1 and 2 kind of do similar things. They suspend Gordon's life, but they don't conclude anything relating to the world really.
Even though I think if there is a HL3, it'll be the last one, I don't know that I'd expect an actual conclusion to the series.
Let's remember the first half life, 3 pictures thread.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=479298&page=1
But wasn't Half-Life bought by them from Sierra when it was beginning the development?
At least that what I've hears years before, but I ain't sure it's true.
Valve are weird. They've released a bunch of games, however they only have one original series created by them which is Half Life.
Everything else they have made was originally created by someone else who was then bought by Valve or Valve bought the rights.
They're a very odd company.
This is true....well except Portal....the portal gameplay was not, but the portal universe is all ValveValve are weird. They've released a bunch of games, however they only have one original series created by them which is Half Life.
Everything else they have made was originally created by someone else who was then bought by Valve or Valve bought the rights.
They're a very odd company.
This is true....well except Portal....the portal gameplay was not, but the portal universe is all Valve
A lot of the gameplay is Valve too. Hell, most of it is, all but portals more or less.This is true....well except Portal....the portal gameplay was not, but the portal universe is all Valve
... Yeah, no. You should really try Narbacular Drop. It's kind of awful. And the only thing the two games share are portals. But the way they utilised portals was intriguing and fresh, thusly Valve hired the students, and with this intriguing concept, they developed a full game, a fleshed out story and a proper IP.Technically they still hired Kim Swift and company to make Portal 1. Tying it to Half Life 2 was valve, but it is still Kim Swift and her teams game.
Source 2 and Left 4 Dead 3. Known facts, innit
Without steam, what has Valve done significant in the past 10 years? Made 1 popular game on PC.
Steam box, steam controller, and looks it has OUYA momentum.
I still just don't see the market for steam machines.
Gamers who don't care about PC gaming and the extra bells and whistles that come with a custom built PC will get a console.
Gamers who care about PC gaming and the extra bells and whistles will build a PC.
Who are steam machines for?
As for the question, I'm sure we'll hear stuff in conjunction with source 2
Didn't someone just make this thread? Or am I just having deja vu...
Didn't someone just make this thread? Or am I just having deja vu...
Didn't someone just make this thread? Or am I just having deja vu...
That was "Where's Half-Life?", basically.
This is more far reaching.