FutureZombie
Banned
My one wish for the new Zelda is that is has nothing to do with the wii-mote. How likely is it that I will get my way?
FutureZombie said:My one wish for the new Zelda is that is has nothing to do with the wii-mote. How likely is it that I will get my way?
Odds are one to one.FutureZombie said:My one wish for the new Zelda is that is has nothing to do with the wii-mote. How likely is it that I will get my way?
FutureZombie said:My one wish for the new Zelda is that is has nothing to do with the wii-mote. How likely is it that I will get my way?
:lol :lolTwig said:Odds are one to one.
Twig said:Odds are one to one.
Twig said:I'd like to see a Link's Awakening style item system. But... I doubt it has even a tiny chance of happening, given the whole OMG SWORD WIIMOTE HHRRAANNNGHHH thing.
I really liked that TP brought back arrow bombs, although it was a pain in the ass to select and unselect sometimes.AceBandage said:Boomerang Bombs!
That would hardly be an upgrade, don't you think? I mean, the idea is nice an all, but it would be merely a cosmetic change, in my opinion.AceBandage said:Honestly, I hope so.
An upgrade to the inventory system is much appreciated.
FutureZombie said:So the game will be a real wii title... ok, I guess I will have to deal with that. When I first saw Wind Waker (at Spaceworld 2001, was it?) I had a total case of "WTF?" going on. Then, I played it and loved it. After that I promised I would never question Shiggy again. So I won't when I see him waving his hands around on stage. I'll just take a stiff drink, look myself in the mirror, cry a little, and go buy a wii.
What? No dude, it's a PC game, it just supports the Wiimote bluetooth hack.FutureZombie said:So the game will be a real wii title...
Waggle the Wiimote and Link swings his sword!EmCeeGramr said:What? No dude, it's a PC game, it just supports the Wiimote bluetooth hack.
Nintendo would shoot themselves in the foot.farnham said:well its nintendo so it might happen (not showing zelda that is)
AceBandage said:Not having to go into your menu, scroll to items, and set an item to a button...
Instead, you press a single button, and switch items on the fly.
That would allow for quicker, more robust combat and less tedium.
Fairly large upgrade, I'd say.
What else were you expecting it to come out on, exactly?
The 360?
Prime Blue said:Nintendo would shoot themselves in the foot.
I don't know how much the rest of you know about E3 (I'm an expert), but honor and shame are huge parts of it. It's not like it is in normal press conferences where you can become successful by being an asshole. If you screw someone over at E3, you bring shame to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that shame is repentance.
What this means is the online public, after not hearing about this, is not going to want to purchase Zelda for their Wii, nor will they purchase any of Nintendo's games. This is HUGE. You can laugh all you want, but Nintendo would alienate an entire market with this move.
Nintendo, publicly announce and show Zelda for Wii or you can kiss your business goodbye.
The only problem of Nintendo being third party would be that they wouldn't make that great games then.. since Hardware and Software work together.FutureZombie said:Not expecting, just hoping. I've been hoping a terrible scandal would force Nintendo to go third party for the last 8 years. I'm not sure what course of events would set that in motion, but I imagine there's a way.
Prime Blue said:Nintendo would shoot themselves in the foot.
I don't know how much the rest of you know about E3 (I'm an expert), but honor and shame are huge parts of it. It's not like it is in normal press conferences where you can become successful by being an asshole. If you screw someone over at E3, you bring shame to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that shame is repentance.
What this means is the online public, after not hearing about this, is not going to want to purchase Zelda for their Wii, nor will they purchase any of Nintendo's games. This is HUGE. You can laugh all you want, but Nintendo would alienate an entire market with this move.
Nintendo, publicly announce and show Zelda for Wii or you can kiss your business goodbye.
Prime Blue said:Nintendo would shoot themselves in the foot.
I don't know how much the rest of you know about E3 (I'm an expert), but honor and shame are huge parts of it. It's not like it is in normal press conferences where you can become successful by being an asshole. If you screw someone over at E3, you bring shame to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that shame is repentance.
What this means is the online public, after not hearing about this, is not going to want to purchase Zelda for their Wii, nor will they purchase any of Nintendo's games. This is HUGE. You can laugh all you want, but Nintendo would alienate an entire market with this move.
Nintendo, publicly announce and show Zelda for Wii or you can kiss your business goodbye.
Boney said:The only problem of Nintendo being third party would be that they wouldn't make that great games then.. since Hardware and Software work together.
FutureZombie said:Because there are no great games made by third parties?
AceBandage covered me but yeah..FutureZombie said:Because there are no great games made by third parties?
AceBandage said:What Boney means is that Nintendo creates its hardware for its games.
They make it so that they can get the most out of it.
well yeah they made it for the gamecubeFutureZombie said:Well Twilight Princess worked on two consoles
And it was better there.EmCeeGramr said:well yeah they made it for the gamecube
because it was nintendo's gameFutureZombie said:I don't see why TP or WW couldn't have been made on either of the other last gen consoles.
Prime Blue said:And it was better there.
EmCeeGramr said:because it was nintendo's game
why don't sony and microsoft just quit making consoles and develop pc only!?!??!
FutureZombie said:I wish there was just one console. It's stupid to have three.
Don't let Nintendo fool you into thinking they need to make hardware for their software to live up to its full potential. That's like when a dealership tells you that only they can change your oil. Freaking Jiffy Lube can change your oil just fine. Maybe that's not the best analogy ever, but oh well. That's what you're getting from me right now.
Free camera, non-mirrored, instant swordplay, Epona backflip.AceBandage said:No widescreen and longer loading = better?
![]()
It's not that it wouldn't be a feasible thing to do. Rather than it was easier to develop these titles than it would be on another console for them, andit doesn't necesarily mean graphical prowess.FutureZombie said:I don't see why TP or WW couldn't have been made on either of the other last gen consoles.
DeathbyVolcano said:Wait a minute, wtf is going on here.
...Someone not understanding why Nintendo makes games exclusively for a Nintendo system?
Prime Blue said:Nintendo would shoot themselves in the foot.
I don't know how much the rest of you know about E3 (I'm an expert), but honor and shame are huge parts of it. It's not like it is in normal press conferences where you can become successful by being an asshole. If you screw someone over at E3, you bring shame to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that shame is repentance.
What this means is the online public, after not hearing about this, is not going to want to purchase Zelda for their Wii, nor will they purchase any of Nintendo's games. This is HUGE. You can laugh all you want, but Nintendo would alienate an entire market with this move.
Nintendo, publicly announce and show Zelda for Wii or you can kiss your business goodbye.
Cow Mengde said:We're approaching the 1 year anniversary of this meme.
By new Zelda, do you by chance mean the GC version of Twilight Princess?FutureZombie said:My one wish for the new Zelda is that is has nothing to do with the wii-mote. How likely is it that I will get my way?
Cow Mengde said:We're approaching the 1 year anniversary of this meme.
hahahaha no way. bravo, sir.Prime Blue said:Nintendo would shoot themselves in the foot.
I don't know how much the rest of you know about E3 (I'm an expert), but honor and shame are huge parts of it. It's not like it is in normal press conferences where you can become successful by being an asshole. If you screw someone over at E3, you bring shame to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that shame is repentance.
What this means is the online public, after not hearing about this, is not going to want to purchase Zelda for their Wii, nor will they purchase any of Nintendo's games. This is HUGE. You can laugh all you want, but Nintendo would alienate an entire market with this move.
Nintendo, publicly announce and show Zelda for Wii or you can kiss your business goodbye.
Rez said:I miss the one post trend of talking about the Gamecube controller and how great it was in this thread.
![]()
Ether_Snake said:I think his weapon is basically a magical sword that can turn into any weapon/tool.
So the sword can turn into the bow, the hookshot, the boomrang, etc., or at least do equivalent functions as those tools. This is because the player never actually changes input device (always the Wiimote) so in the same way Link never actually changes weapon, especially since you have 1-1 control between the Wiimote and the sword.
To it will be more immersive in that regard because in a way, you are always holding "the sword", it just changes based on how you want to use it.
Rez said:I miss the one post trend of talking about the Gamecube controller and how great it was in this thread.
![]()
AceBandage said:No widescreen and longer loading = better?
![]()
SCReuter said:GameCube version also lacks the following:
- Infrared aiming
- Over-the-shoulder camera
- Four item slots
- Uninterrupted weapon scrolling
- Locked frame rate
- The ability to aim freely while strafing/steering Epona