Street Fighter V is never leaving PS4 & PC, just letting you know. You do have a point with the rest, though.
Marvel vs Capcom vs Nintendo. NX exclusive
The salt would be bigger than Bayonetta 2
Street Fighter V is never leaving PS4 & PC, just letting you know. You do have a point with the rest, though.
Do you want to see NeoGAF burn?Marvel vs Capcom vs Nintendo. NX exclusiveThe salt would be bigger than Bayonetta 2
Street Fighter V is never leaving PS4 & PC, just letting you know. You do have a point with the rest, though.
Do you want to see NeoGAF burn?
I thought Microsoft was moving away from buying out third party exclusives? Plus it would screw over Capcom's CFN initiative.If I could make that bet, I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft paid for MvC 4 exclusiveness to combat the Street Fighter V PS4. MS has been know to pay up before.
Street Fighter V is never leaving PS4 & PC, just letting you know. You do have a point with the rest, though.
Capcom isn't doing any Super versions of Street Fighter V, just waves of DLC. One disc is all you'll need.Ultra street fighter 5.1 super championship turbo edition acade
Ultra street fighter 5.1 super championship turbo edition acade
Rösti;193829096 said:TSE operating hours are 09.00 - 15.00 (JST). I believe the earnings release will come on February 2 after the market closes.
Sometime shortly after 01.00 AM EST Feb. 2 then.
Rösti;193831697 said:Nintendo's FY 2015 Third Quarter Financial Results Briefing starts at 10.00 AM (JST) on February 3. How long the presentation will be I don't know, but it will be followed by a Q&A session.
Both said their contacts didn't have kits.
Imagine how great it would be to Hype for a.. normal console that wouldn't have a normal third party support anyway.
Nothing obviously. It would remain the Wii U game that it is right now.
They said their contacts told them they have no kits. If the contacts are under tight ndas that is the only thing they could have said without revealing anything.
Yes it would be that, then the NX console release with higher resolution etc would have to be released later at the launch of the NX console in 2017. Or they could hold back the NX version (handheld and console) for the launch of the NX console in 2017.
Edit: Oh wait if all NX games are only released as one cartridge (not separate releases for console and handheld) then they couldn't launch the console and handheld version separately, my bad.
But I still think Nintendo could just release the Zelda NX cartridge at the launch of the handheld.
I could see a scenario where Square gives Nintendo a lot of that support the PSP received back in the day. There is a market for them in the handheld realm. The 3DS took some of it but there is so much more potential.
Capcom isn't doing any Super versions of Street Fighter V, just waves of DLC. One disc is all you'll need.
Do you want to see NeoGAF burn?
Capcom's actually making an effort to not split up the player-base like they did with SFIV, especially now that they're going eSports.http://www.escapistmagazine.com/new...et-Fighter-IV-Wont-Ever-Become-Hyper-or-Ultra
Don't ever trust anything Capcom says.
If Nintendo have been creating a port of Zelda for both the NX handheld (if it could run Zelda Wii U) and console then possibly an NX handheld version could be released. If not then just the Wii U version.
I'm not feeling good about the NX reveal.
That was the big secret wtf??? PowerPC 750 cpu? 100% independent library between handheld and console? What were they thinking when they named that thing??
Why would anyone want to play a game seemingly as big as Zelda on a handheld though?
I don't see why not, there is a lot of huge games on handheld. It would be the same experience as on console just scaled down (visually, not in terms of content). There might not be a lot of large open world games on handheld but I think it could be popular. It might be more popular than the console version in the Japanese market too.Why would anyone want to play a game seemingly as big as Zelda on a handheld though?
I could think of a few practical reasons, and so could the majority of the population in Japan.
You have to consider that Nintendo's handhelds typically sell better than the consoles. So if they really want to go back to "Nintendo-like" profits, it'd be best to prime the handheld for a holiday release. As for why they would split the releases, it'd be for the same reason why iPhones & iPads don't release at the same time. You'd avoid making the lives of retailers a living hell & you'll increase the chances of people wanting to double-dip later. You don't get that if you front-load everything.As I said to Moon above, I'm kinda torn on this. For one, yes, they could release Zelda NX handheld only this Fall and then release the cart, playable on both systems, at the launch of the handheld. But as you said they could also just hold off on releasing Zelda NX at all until the console comes out, if it does in fact come out after the handheld. When we get into this level of speculation though a few things come to mind for me.
One, I still think Zelda at least in the West is a big draw as a system seller, especially if it reinvents the look of the franchise dramatically as it seems to in Zelda U for the first time since Spaceworld 2001 unveiled Toon Link. So if Nintendo this fall offers a new handheld or console with no way to play the new Zelda and a similar asking price as Wii U, maybe people will just say, eh, I'm getting a cheap Wii U this year for Zelda.
Second, as KingSnake has discussed previously in this thread, and wisely so, I think it's a bit of a mess for Nintendo to release these two systems more than a short period of time apart. If the handheld comes out first people will play game x and not care about getting the console just to replay it. If the console comes out first, then you're faced with the opposite problem. If the main hook of NX is that you can play all the same games on two different form factors, why release the systems at different times? I think it just creates confusion and cognitive dissonance for the consumer. Hmm. It's a tough nut to crack for sure. I understand the problem of shelf space. But...Nintendo wants to return to significant profits by March 2017, if I recall correctly. I don't see a handheld alone necessarily being a big enough holiday seller and I think to achieve the rumored shipment numbers and/or projected profits both systems may need to arrive by the end of the next fiscal year. (If I'm totally mistaken in this thought process, anyone please feel free to correct me.)
We haven't seen a console launch outside of the holiday season in the West at least since...9/9/99? If anything the handheld could release more easily at another time of year, but then you have the other problem of the two recent big handhelds releasing not in the holiday season (in the West at least) and having difficulties in the market, which then makes me wonder if the handheld would do better released during the holidays.
Capcom isn't doing any Super versions of Street Fighter V, just waves of DLC. One disc is all you'll need.
I also think it would be unwise to release the handheld and console NX significantly far apart from each other. I was just responding to the hypothetical situation where only the NX handheld launches this year. The best case scenario for Zelda on NX would be both the NX handheld and console launching this fall with the Zelda NX cartridge (alongside the Wii U version) IMO.As I said to Moon above, I'm kinda torn on this. For one, yes, they could release Zelda NX handheld only this Fall and then release the cart, playable on both systems, at the launch of the handheld. But as you said they could also just hold off on releasing Zelda NX at all until the console comes out, if it does in fact come out after the handheld. When we get into this level of speculation though a few things come to mind for me.
One, I still think Zelda at least in the West is a big draw as a system seller, especially if it reinvents the look of the franchise dramatically as it seems to in Zelda U for the first time since Spaceworld 2001 unveiled Toon Link. So if Nintendo this fall offers a new handheld or console with no way to play the new Zelda and a similar asking price as Wii U, maybe people will just say, eh, I'm getting a cheap Wii U this year for Zelda.
Second, as KingSnake has discussed previously in this thread, and wisely so, I think it's a bit of a mess for Nintendo to release these two systems more than a short period of time apart. If the handheld comes out first people will play game x and not care about getting the console just to replay it. If the console comes out first, then you're faced with the opposite problem. If the main hook of NX is that you can play all the same games on two different form factors, why release the systems at different times? I think it just creates confusion and cognitive dissonance for the consumer. Hmm. It's a tough nut to crack for sure. I understand the problem of shelf space. But...Nintendo wants to return to significant profits by March 2017, if I recall correctly. I don't see a handheld alone necessarily being a big enough holiday seller and I think to achieve the rumored shipment numbers and/or projected profits both systems may need to arrive by the end of the next fiscal year. (If I'm totally mistaken in this thought process, anyone please feel free to correct me.)
We haven't seen a console launch outside of the holiday season in the West at least since...9/9/99? If anything the handheld could release more easily at another time of year, but then you have the other problem of the two recent big handhelds releasing not in the holiday season (in the West at least) and having difficulties in the market, which then makes me wonder if the handheld would do better released during the holidays.
You have to consider that Nintendo's handhelds typically sell better than the consoles. So if they really want to go back to "Nintendo-like" profits, it'd be best to prime the handheld for a holiday release. As for why they would split the releases, it'd be for the same reason why iPhones & iPads don't release at the same time. You'd avoid making the lives of retailers a living hell & you'll increase the chances of people wanting to double-dip later. You don't get that if you front-load everything.
The thing that justifies super strict NDAsWhat? What big secret was revealed that you're questioning as "that was the big secret?"?
Yeah, that's the thing. Either that's delayed or they launch it first on Wii U.If only the NX handheld releases this year, what would happen to Zelda?
It's almost hard to believe that Nintendo's CPU partner for home consoles has been IBM, for the last 17 years.
That's nothing compared to the partnership behind Silicon Graphics/ArtX/ATi/AMD. One splinter and two mergers couldn't stop the continuity lasting 23 years so far, and unlike with IBM it's rather unlikely to stop now.
I never said that the NX Console would have to wait until late next year, probably until early next year (say, February or March).But then what about the home console market? Wii U doesn't have the software to survive another year and a half to 2 years.
It's like playing Skyrim on your cellphone. It's impractical and there are better designed games on handhelds.
I never said that the NX Console would have to wait until late next year, probably until early next year (say, February or March).
Who would buy a console during that time of the year ?I never said that the NX Console would have to wait until late next year, probably until early next year (say, February or March).
That argument goes both ways. You could argue about those who would get a 3DS for Christmas if the NX Console came out first & the NX Handheld came out later. Either way, the NX Handheld is probably gonna sell more (assuming that the shared platform thing pans out). As such, I wouldn't be shocked if said NX Handheld ends up being the flagship NX device & is treated as such.But Nintendo never releases new home consoles in those months. What about people who get Wii U for Christmas.
I never said that the NX Console would have to wait until late next year, probably until early next year (say, February or March).
Same thing would happen if they released the NX Handheld around that time (like they normally do for handhelds) in relation to the 3DS.Releasing a console in Feb or March is just saying please don't buy our Wii-U console for Christmas
I don't think a handheld can or will be treated as a flagship device of a company if said company makes a device with better specification's.That argument goes both ways. You could argue about those who would get a 3DS for Christmas if the NX Console came out first & the NX Handheld came out later. Either way, the NX Handheld is probably gonna sell more (assuming that the shared platform thing pans out). As such, I wouldn't be shocked if said NX Handheld ends up being the flagship NX device & is treated as such.
I don't think a handheld can or will be treated as a flagship device of a company if said company makes a device with better specification's.
They are but the general public will never see it that way.Handhelds have been their big money maker though.
The thing that justifies super strict NDAs
They are but the general public will never see it that way.
I wouldn't recommend launching any Nintendo hardware outside of the Sept-Dec timeframe.
When I think of hardware launching in North America in the spring or summer, I think of failed hardware like Sega Saturn (May), PS Vita (March), and Virtual Boy (August)
To be fair, the 3DS launched in March, too, and ended up being a success. Then again, it had to relaunch that summer/holiday season with a price drop and flagship games.
The 3DS launched in March and it struggled out the gate, which forced Iwata to slash the price by $70 six months later.
3DS sales didn't rebound until the holidays when Mario Kart and 3D World were released.
We have to think about it from a different perspective. I agree with Neoxon that the handheld will be flagship device, because outside of the Wii, handhelds have been their flagship for the past several generations.
No shit they would launch their money maker first. The console should be treated as an extension to that. Like the iPad to the iPhone.
This is true but we can't guarantee if that was because of its launch time or because it was a more appealing product 6 months later with more games and a cheaper price tag.
That feels really weird to me. The DS lite was my first gaming device.We have to think about it from a different perspective. I agree with Neoxon that the handheld will be flagship device, because outside of the Wii, handhelds have been their flagship for the past several generations.
No shit they would launch their money maker first. The console should be treated as an extension to that. Like the iPad to the iPhone.
They've shown this practise with Super Smash Bros, we can expect to see it again.
That argument goes both ways. You could argue about those who would get a 3DS for Christmas if the NX Console came out first & the NX Handheld came out later. Either way, the NX Handheld is probably gonna sell more (assuming that the shared platform thing pans out). As such, I wouldn't be shocked if said NX Handheld ends up being the flagship NX device & is treated as such.
Iwata said:When it comes to how dedicated game systems are being played, the situations have become rather different, especially between Japan and overseas. Since we are always thinking about how to create a new platform that will be accepted by as many people around the world as possible, we would like to offer to them "a dedicated video game platform with a brand new concept" by taking into consideration various factors, including the playing environments that differ by country.
Yep thats what I'm most looking forward to learning about and hopefully its an official feature and not just something lost in speculation and analyzation. Lets hope we find out shortly.Only this time, we wouldn't have to worry about two separate versions if the library is shared. If they launch the console later, you already have your library with you in the handheld. That software is just accessible on the more expensive, powerful device.
Hence, iPhones and iPads.