I mean they basically had to re-do the rest of prequel trilogy because TPM was so bad. That 10 year time skip wasn't for shits and giggles. It was because they fucked up HARD.
TPM is in the top 3 SW movies, and aotc is the worst
Edgy.The Force Awakens.
I agree with this. Also the anticipation with seeing a "grown up" Anakin and the famed Clone Wars and then to have all the hope so thoroughly destroyed was an astounding accomplishment. And then there was Yoda hopping around with a light saber which ranks for me as one of the worst Star Wars things ever.Attack of the Clones felt like the production team realized Star Wars was ruined so they gave up completely. The Phantom Menace at least felt like effort was behind it. It was almost a mediocre film.
There are two narratives on this. One is that George is a lone genius, and one is that George is a moron and was constantly saved by others (Huyck and Katz, Kurtz, Marcia).If you've ever seen the original drafts of the first SW, you can really see the problems of the prequels in them. There's lots of tedious politics and exposition, and it's not very focused or polished. The characters seem very vague. I absolutely believe that George had a TON of help turning those original ideas into a tight, explosive film. One place he obviously got saved was in the editing room, they did what is probably the finest editing job of our time on a very uncertain pile of film.
So, basically the first films are collaborative, and the sequels are what we get when he works completely on his own. Kind of like that first draft.
Good post. This is where I stand too. I think he just really lost his way. He seems like a different person completely in early interviews.There are two narratives on this. One is that George is a lone genius, and one is that George is a moron and was constantly saved by others (Huyck and Katz, Kurtz, Marcia).
I don't think either of those is true.
Have you read Rinzler's book on the making of A New Hope? I think it provides the best account of the process the film went through, and I came out of it with both more appreciation for George than ever before, AND a lot of appreciation for his gifted collaborators.
I think the prequels are the way they are because George Lucas became a mogul. He struggled to see his own films as an organic piece of storytelling, aware as he was of the degree to which Star Wars was a larger media "brand" that the film was only a part of. I also think that after spending 30 years innovating in effects with all of his companies it became difficult for him to separate that from what the film actually needed. I think James Cameron and Peter Jackson have had some similar difficulties with recent films.
I never understood why the hell she wore something like that for dinner with a "friend".That's because Padme was a freak.
There are two narratives on this. One is that George is a lone genius, and one is that George is a moron and was constantly saved by others (Huyck and Katz, Kurtz, Marcia).
I don't think either of those is true.
Have you read Rinzler's book on the making of A New Hope? I think it provides the best account of the process the film went through, and I came out of it with both more appreciation for George than ever before, AND a lot of appreciation for his gifted collaborators.
I think the prequels are the way they are because George Lucas became a mogul. He struggled to see his own films as an organic piece of storytelling, aware as he was of the degree to which Star Wars was a larger media "brand" that the film was only a part of. I also think that after spending 30 years innovating in effects with all of his companies it became difficult for him to separate that from what the film actually needed. I think James Cameron and Peter Jackson have had some similar difficulties with recent films.
I liked the battle scenes as a whole it made it feel like "Star WARS." Emphasis on the wars part, with millions of troops fighting across the galaxy on different planets and systems rather than just a small band of rebels and the big Empire.
I always thought when I was a kid and I saw this movie, it had the "War" I wanted in a sci-fi flick, maybe that's just my opinion.
By the way the Clone Wars TV Show and Ep. 3 had good scenes of the clone wars.
So I guess Ep. 2 may be bad as a whole but it set up a great period/ arc in the series in my opinion.
The Phantom Menace is still somewhat enjoyable even with terrible acting, directing and Jar Jar Binks. A lot of stuff was still done practical, editing was still somewhat logical, CG was still mostly fine because it wasn't the main focus. And it still feels like people had some say so in the project and had just slightly input into the project. You see them actively asking and judging Lucas during the test screening at first and even Lucas admits that he's gone a bit far. But later it's an 'artistic direction' and you see the hope just sinks with everyone else and I think that after that no one cared about the other two films.
I've watched TPM multiple times and still watch it at times whenever I'm in the mood. TCW is the film I've watched twice. Once on DVD because I've never seen it and once on Blu-ray because, well Blu-ray. I've never watched it again since. It's such a terrible film from beginning to end and I just can't bring myself to watch it again.
Which moments?Clones - TPM is not great and I hate Jar-Jar as much as everyone else but at least it's coherent story kept in SW spirit. Clones on the other hand is just atrocious and only has few moments saving it from total disaster.
U heard me
I remember walking out of the theater like.. It wasn't that bad..The first one because it's hard to express the depth of bitter disappointment, bewilderment and betrayal I felt walking out of the cinema after watching that utter pile of retconning shite.
#teamextreamsalt
I remember walking out of the theater like.. It wasn't that bad..
.. Right?
Clones is the bottom of the barrel.
No. actually, its the sewage that has leaked outside the barrel and is now poisoning the water supply and giving you Cholera.
TPM at least has Darth Maul and decent effects that hold up to this day unlike the PS2 games that are AotC AND RotS.
ppl like to dismiss aotc and tpm but they tried new ideas and pushed the sw audience to new characters and archetypes while something like tfa is just a nostalgia cashgrab remix of safe characters and a tired narrative structure. art vs commerce. commerce always wins in the minds of the masses.
Someone is in denial if they think the prequels aren't the poster boy for commerce over art.then art was a mistake it's nothing but CG trash.
This is my opinion as well. They're both middling, but at least Attack of the Clones has meaning. Things happen. TPM is complete mediocre fluff. You're watching a bad film and end none the wiser.Unpopular opinion it seems, since people so hate the romance plot in AOTC, but I have always thought The Phantom Menace was massively worse. It simply has no reason to exist.
Attack of the Clones does actually have a plot and a central character arc, whether it is well executed or not. The film has identifiable characters, an actual villain, and relationships that develop.
The Phantom Menace has a couple fun sequences, a lot of messy sequences, no protagonist, no relationships, and absolutely no reason to exist at all.
Someone is in denial if they think the prequels aren't the poster boy for commerce over art.
Isn't clones the one where they say m'lady like 30,000 times? That one is worse.
We are talking about Star Wars here. Of course, it's commerce. The prequels are full of stuff which only exist to sell toys.
The Force Awakens.