Why are the CPU clocks of Switch 2 so low in docked?

Not in any way comparable. The steam deck is running crowd density medium, which is much higher than what the Switch 2 is doing. Many other settings are probably not comparable as well.
You're talking to a brick wall. It has been pointed out many times that the Steam Deck is perfectly capable of using XeSS, but he will keep using the same tired sources that use FSR2 and compare it to the docked mode.

He is simply trolling with his fake persona.
 
Cyberpunk is one of the most demanding games in existence and makes sense to compare tech with it
There are 26 threads about Cyberpunk on the Switch created between April and today, I think we're way past the point where we need to create new threads for this game.





















MOD NOTE: Use spoiler tags please. No one wants to scroll through all that
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dampf Dampf
To answer the question: To compensate for the heavily increased GPU clocks.

Nevertheless, just like Switch 1, there is a burst mode to 1.7 Ghz for brief amounts of time.

This isn't new, by the way. Since the Wii, Nintendo favors having modern GPU's over modern or fast CPU's. The Wii used a 1997-based G3 processor, the Wii U had IBM go back to their archives to make the Espresso, which is quite 3 Wii CPU's taped together. The Switch had A57 ARM, but low clocked and no match for even PS360 CPU's.

Now with 8x A78, Low clocks is again the chip on the console's shoulder. But the GPU supports everything you need to know. Just like Switch 1, and just like Wii U relatively to its competition. The Wii GPU is the only real outlier, by sticking to Geforce 2 like texture combiners in an age of unified shaders or hell, even shaders in general.

Also heh at that Gigabowser ban.
 
The higher CPU clock in handheld could also be to help offset the reduced memory bandwidth of handheld. Throwing more CPU cycles could help the game logic keep up with docked play when in bandwidth limited scenarios.
 
Y'all complaining about 1ghz when the PSP CPU ran at 222-333mhz :v

But I think it should be fine.
It's a shame Nintendo didn't use 4-5nm tsmc. Yeah would've cut on profit margins or made Switch 2 more expensive, but it would've been a lot better for it
The PSP released 20-21 years ago in 2005 in NA and Europe. In Japan 2004.
 
I understand why it'd be running low in handheld mode, to save battery life.

But c'mon, 1 GHz is so low you can't expect good performnce out of the CPU at these clock speeds, even on power efficient ARM.

Curiously enough, the clock speeds in docked mode are actually lower than in handheld mode, you would think it'd be the other way around. Now I also understand why you want them to be similar, because graphics can be scaled more easily between the modes but the CPU performance is a more fixed target. Basically you won't want to have a situation where a game could run in docked mode but couldn't in handheld mode.

However, take a look how Cyberpunk shipped:


zBW5zQZ.png


It's obvious some developers don't care about abysmal performance.

In my opinion, Nintendo should add a mode where they heavily overclock the CPU in docked mode, to atleast 2 GHz or higher for titles like that, that would help immensely. Handheld will continue to run shitty like that but atleast in docked mode it would run decently.

Of course I don't know the thermal headroom they have in docked mode but I'd assume the temperatures are pretty low due to the additional fan. I think the charger also delivers up to 60W which should be more than enough.
Why do the haters on here keep trying to pick holes with the Switch 2 and keep making salty threads. That would be a much better question lol..
 
Why the fuck are you writing like that? Jesus christ.
You are supposed to know he has a condition.

I wasn't linked to the post that would say which condition, but there you go.

But given in the reasoning it says its a shtick, it may very well be a spiel. In which case, that's very annoying.
The game runs on mobile chips, even my ancient 1060 could run it at playable framerates. It's a last generation game. Without PT, it's not much of a benchmark these days.
CP is a game that over the years has become more scalable as newer GPU's came along. However even the regular RT (non-Overdrive) mode still provides quite a punch and its one of the few games with large geometry and pedastrian density.

Hence its a benchmark.
 
Last edited:
You are supposed he has a condition.

I wasn't linked to the post that would say which condition, but there you go.

But given in the reasoning it says its a shtick, it may very well be a spiel. In which case, that's very annoying.

It seems way to weird to be a condition. It's just his way of getting attention.
 
Just like with the Tegra X1, you can definitely tell this is an Nvidia SoC. Relatively shit CPU, fantastic GPU. One thing though OP, the CPU can officially go all the way up to 1.7 ghz so... All they'd need to do is to unlock that profile docked, that's more realistic if I have to say.
 
Last edited:
It's on 8 Samsung node, u can't expect much, if it was on tsmc 7nm, there would have big improvement in performance, Nintendo being Nintendo, they love penny pinching.
 
It's a slim form factor, they designed around it 🤷‍♂️

What a stupid fucking comment

Go laptop form factor while we're at it, why would I pick downclocked PC handhelds?

Oh why not a tower?
Handheld PCs are slim enough plus have better grip. Why not design close enough and not suck in clock/heat aspect??
 
Handheld PCs are slim enough plus have better grip.

Good for you! Buy it.

Slim enough... lol

WhatsApp-Image-2024-08-10-at-9.31.05-AM.jpeg



Why not design close enough and not suck in clock/heat aspect??

They balanced everything for the form factor and LPDDR5x bandwidth limitations

Which clearly every other PC handhelds outside Steam deck fucked up big time. Doesn't matter those high clocks, they're starving on bandwidth. Super inefficient. They're engineering jokes, totally unbalanced, a shitload of computational power left idle. Too much compute for what it can feed. There's no "Steam deck 2" until memory has a huge boost, or you have APUs with tons of cache.
 
Good for you! Buy it.

Slim enough... lol

WhatsApp-Image-2024-08-10-at-9.31.05-AM.jpeg





They balanced everything for the form factor and LPDDR5x bandwidth limitations

Which clearly every other PC handhelds outside Steam deck fucked up big time. Doesn't matter those high clocks, they're starving on bandwidth. Super inefficient. They're engineering jokes, totally unbalanced, a shitload of computational power left idle. Too much compute for what it can feed. There's no "Steam deck 2" until memory has a huge boost, or you have APUs with tons of cache.
Already bought it and yes, it is slim enough without sucking in clocks/heat.

Of course those higher clocks matter. In Both PCs and SWs they increase performance!!! Nintendo should give an option.
 
Already bought it and yes, it is slim enough without sucking in clocks/heat.

Of course those higher clocks matter. In Both PCs and SWs they increase performance!!! Nintendo should give an option.

The switch 2 is what it is, can you live with it? No probably not and you'll never buy it.

So the question is can you stop coming into Switch 2 threads like a Jehovah witness trying to promote trash PC handhelds? Or is that impossible?
 
The only cutback I can see on the Switch 2 relative to last gen is the shadow resolution. (Perhaps to save memory bandwidth). The crowd density setting looks to match the last gen consoles.
From all the media videos I've passively seen, frustums/Draw distances look setup like Vita games compared to typical PS4 home console renders IMO, and lots of items look like they are statically lit immediately outside the foreground on Switch 1 and 2 game versions, and lots of facet edges on random items too.

Maybe it is just early days and development pipelines are still too much in Switch 1 development, but even with Switch 2 ports having performance issues they also still look like they aren't carrying a full home console workload, yet IMO.
 
The switch 2 is what it is, can you live with it? No probably not and you'll never buy it.

So the question is can you stop coming into Switch 2 threads like a Jehovah witness trying to promote trash PC handhelds? Or is that impossible?
You didn't look mad with tons of threads comparing Deck, Series S and SW2. I wonder why. 🤔
 
You didn't look mad with tons of threads comparing Deck, Series S and SW2. I wonder why 🤔.

I was in switch 2 threads and almost always responding to some SD/PC handheld owner claim

UH, I wonder why?

I don't go into PC handheld threads to insert Switch 2 into the conversation every fucking minutes.
 
I was in switch 2 threads and almost always responding to some SD/PC handheld owner claim

UH, I wonder why?

I don't go into PC handheld threads to insert Switch 2 into the conversation every fucking minutes.
No one should care, because "how dare you discuss similar tech/aspects from 2 gaming machines? You should only discuss SW2 aspects in a bubble in a SW2 thread".
 
No one should care, because "how dare you discuss similar tech/aspects from 2 gaming machines? You should only discuss SW2 aspects in a bubble in a SW2 thread".

Your arguments are always just "why is it not ROG ally X?"

Nobody gives a shit. Nobody.

Go run some path tracing cyberpunk 2077 on Steam deck for all I care.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom